evince
Truthmatters
Witnesses say they were screaming contradictory orders at herThey clearly ordered her to get out of the car, she swerved to miss the officer and escape.
Not a justified killing.
Witnesses say they were screaming contradictory orders at herThey clearly ordered her to get out of the car, she swerved to miss the officer and escape.
Not a justified killing.
Correct , she did not comply with the officers request.... She stepped on the gas and the car became a weapon.... You don't flee... everybody knows that... She shouldn't have been blocking the road to begin withThey clearly ordered her to get out of the car, she swerved to miss the officer and escape.
Not a justified killing.
He moved into harms way, and then he murdered her.She was clearly attempting to drive around him. He shot after the danger was passed. She was successful at avoiding harming him. Had she wanted to hit him, she would have.
They murdered herIt looked to me like she was paying attention to the guy at her window and not the guy in front of the car. I'm interested to see what comes of it. I have made my prediction and will stick with it. I believe that it will be found to be justified, even if Walz really talks all bad-assed.
Witnesses say they were screaming contradictory orders at her you shit bagCorrect , she did not comply with the officers request.... She stepped on the gas and the car became a weapon.... You don't flee... everybody knows that... She shouldn't have been blocking the road to begin with
Federal use of force guidelines do not allow shooting someone because they refused to get out of a car. It seems you like other RW cult members are making it clear that Ashli Babbit deserved to be shot because she didn't do what she was told.The video shows that it's absolutely true.... The minute she stepped on that gas that car became a weapon.... They told her to get out of the car. You can hear them telling her to get Out of the car , which was blocking the road...
When, and if, it comes to trial, will it be revealed he was one of Trump's pardoned 1/6 terrorists?He moved into harms way, and then he murdered her.

Well, it is an attack with a deadly weapon. I don't think she was doing it to change government policy or to frighten the populace so terrorism is a stretch.Vehicular Aggression towards a federal agent is domestic terrorism...
All while the masked unidentified men were screaming contradictory orders at herHe moved into harms way, and then he murdered her.
He fucked up and, IMO, was ill trained. It's a good guess he's one of Trump's militia terrorists.Federal use of force guidelines do not allow shooting someone because they refused to get out of a car. It seems you like other RW cult members are making it clear that Ashli Babbit deserved to be shot because she didn't do what she was told.
You assholes will them call it a fake trialWhen, and if, it comes to trial, will it be revealed he was one of Trump's pardoned 1/6 terrorists?![]()
YeapHe fucked up and, IMO, was ill trained. It's a good guess he's one of Trump's militia terrorists.
suck that orange cock traitorWell, it is an attack with a deadly weapon. I don't think she was doing it to change government policy or to frighten the populace so terrorism is a stretch.
The question will be: What did the Agent believe? Did he believe his life, or the life of others, was in danger?
Think of an officer having a toy gun pointed at them, one that looks real. The question isn't were they in danger, the question would be do they believe that they are in danger...
How is this different from Ashli Babbitt?Well, it is an attack with a deadly weapon. I don't think she was doing it to change government policy or to frighten the populace so terrorism is a stretch.
The question will be: What did the Agent believe? Did he believe his life, or the life of others, was in danger?
Mobthink had a hold on those folks, if Babbitt got in there were what appeared to be hundreds ready to follow. The Capital Police were ill prepared and had no less than lethal crowd control weapons on them that could deal with a mob. Mobs act differently than individuals, and not all of those people were unarmed, those breaking the glass for instance had weapons, enough to break reinforced glass which they could crack skulls with...
Did she "deserve" to die? Questionable.
Did that one shot protect lives? Unquestionably.
There were 60 Congress critters on the floor or in the balcony.
What we should be considering is better training and reactions to mobs, better and less lethal equipment. This idea that we can put this man in prison for this action, when it is clear that reasonable people may believe that lives were in danger is IMHO poor reasoning. That mob was not going to stop without some incentive, something to interrupt the mobthink... She just happened to be the first person poised to breach the barrier.
...and Trump will pardon him if it's a federal trial.You assholes will them call it a fake trial
So, me pointing out that the cop killing Ashli Babbitt should not be charged is now different than me pointing out that a cop being threatened with a vehicle should not be charged?How is this different from Ashli Babbitt?
How can she comply with more than one contradictory order?Correct , she did not comply with the officers request.... She stepped on the gas and the car became a weapon.... You don't flee... everybody knows that... She shouldn't have been blocking the road to begin with
SureSo, me pointing out that the cop killing Ashli Babbitt should not be charged is now different than me pointing out that a cop being threatened with a vehicle should not be charged?
Please start making sense, man.
No worries, Damo. You're free to defend your beliefs in a King.So, me pointing out that the cop killing Ashli Babbitt should not be charged is now different than me pointing out that a cop being threatened with a vehicle should not be charged?
Please start making sense, man.