Tulsa race massacre

Hawkeye10 said:
You are such a liar.

I am a Progressive (non utopian)
Click to expand...

Right. You are a Progressive just the same way that I am Angelina Jolie. :laugh:

You are a drunken, drug-addicted psycho, who is in cyber love with a fake teacher who enables your nuttery. Well, you're in love with the bottle and then yourself.

There's someone home in your body. Get some help and save him. You can do it. You're worthy.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Right. You are a Progressive just the same way that I am Angelina Jolie. :laugh:

You are a drunken, drug-addicted psycho, who is in cyber love with a fake teacher who enables your nuttery. Well, you're in love with the bottle and then yourself.

There's someone home in your body. Get some help and save him. You can do it. You're worthy.
Click to expand...

I dont have much time for you nasty cunts.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
"They now lie to us constantly (paraphrase)"
Tucker
Click to expand...

Get help. Get a clue. Take your meds. It's in court "no reasonable person would believe" Tucker Carlson.

https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/...y-believes-tucker-carlson-is-reporting-facts/
Tucker Carlson Successfully Argues Nobody Really Believes Tucker Carlson Is Reporting Facts
When Tucker Carlson says on his show “[r]emember the facts of the story; these are undisputed" no reasonable person would believe that he was about to state facts. At least, that was Tucker Carlson's own argument in defending himself from a libel suit.

That argument convinced U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil, who dismissed a lawsuit brought by model and actress Karen McDougal. McDougal sued for defamation, alleging Carlson baselessly told his audience she was extorting the President. President Trump allegedly paid $150,000 to help keep quiet a year-long affair with the former Playboy model...

...According to Judge Vyskocil, “Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer arrives with an appropriate amount of skepticism about the statements he makes." She doesn't stop there, writing that “[w]hether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as exaggeration, non-literal commentary, or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same—the statements are not actionable."
 
guno said:
On May 31-June 1, 1921, white mobs, many of them deputized and armed by city officials, attacked Black residents, homes and businesses in Tulsa, Oklahoma. As many as 300 people were killed, 35 city blocks were destroyed, including thousands of homes and other buildings. The mob targeted the prosperous Black community of Greenwood in a vicious act of white supremacy. The resilient survivors of the massacre rebuilt their community in the following decades and Greenwood today is again being renewed after decades of neglect.

Last year, on the 100th anniversary of this brutal attack, it finally began receiving some of the attention that had been deliberately suppressed for many, many decades.


2088-NothingCanBeChanged.jpg



We cannot have this taught in schools because it will make some feel bad
Click to expand...

360_F_374604522_Bafc5SA3NNKoaeMc1fowwg4bCEb2OO7Q.jpg
 
Dutch Uncle said:
How do you compare Guno's attempts to "tear the nation down" to these traitors, terrorists and criminals?:

5dx6xg.gif
Click to expand...

The ones above managed to not kill anyone, even if one of the rioters was shot and killed by an incompetent, coward of a Capitol police officer. Their riot lasted about three hours and accomplished nothing.
The event guano described was an act of evil based on racism. There is no comparison whatsoever between the two.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top