Lorca
Don't fence me in
No, I think I was pretty clear.
Ha, you were the kid that took his ball and went home when he was losing, huh?
No, I think I was pretty clear.
no, of course... no American in their right mind would wish to see our country occupied by a foreign army.
You're paranoid. The UN does not have the influence of the resources that would be needed to invade the US. There isn't an alliance of nations out there that currently has those recources either. That's just plain crazy talk.
The us didn't assassinate Qaddafi, his own people did. How incredibly uninformed you are.
Really? I'm a dullard and stupid because I ask questions? I'd hate to be your kid.
I said I didnt know numbers but asked if there were enough. The UN has a body of people to use...if the US govt were to throw it's weight around and commandeer them. Call them what you will, "peacekeepers".....but they could be armed and trained. I"m sure the govt would love to keep that name, as a matter of fact.
Just one more person with insults and no actual substance.
Do you think china, russia, or Iran would be interested in contributing to the U.N. in this circumstance?
btw, lmao (it's that funny) that you think my initial post in this thread indicates that I'm a liberal.![]()
The U.N. does have armies. They are taken from the U.N. signatory nations and used for U.N. goals.
Asserting that the U.N. doesnt have armies is being in massive denial.
I am taking your dimwitted posts as a whole; DUH!
Who did you vote for in the last six elections?
Do you think china, russia, or Iran would be interested in contributing to the U.N. in this circumstance?
No. And even if they wanted to contribute, they couldn't.
Another incredibly retarded premise; that China, Russia and Iran could work together on a UN invasion of AmeriKa; you really are THAT stupid.
Aren't they part of the U.N.? Of course they are. Why would they be uninterested do you think?
What would the gain be? I mean, they'd EACH have to mobilize MILLIONS of troops, and use a magic fucking navy (because even combined, they have what amounts to 2 carriers groups, and we can field 16), spending trillions of dollars to invade a nation of incredibly rebellious and independent minded people (who are also more heavily armed than the actual armies that would be invading). What would they possibly gain from it? Resources? They have enough of those as is, and it's far less expensive getting them then trying to come over here. Strategic locations? What would you need those for if, by an act of Azathoth, you defeated the only military power you would NEED a strategic position around? Markets? They already have free and open markets (relatively speaking) here.
There is no possible gain to be had from spending trillions of dollars and millions of lives trying to conquer America.
What if the federal government is complicit? What if they just are wanting U.N. assistance in implementing international environmental laws and handgun reduction initiatives? Are you against the initiatives of the u.n.?
They are NOT insults when they accurately describe your dimwitted comments; how many times do you have to be told the UN has NO ARMY; therefore it cannot be armed before it penetrates that thick skull of yours? Twenty? Thirty?
You weren't asking questions either dullard; you are making clueless statements.
Good lord!
Only when I was playing paranoid nutcases. It's wise not to annoy them any more than neccessary.Ha, you were the kid that took his ball and went home when he was losing, huh?
AGAIN, what the fuck would they gain?
No and even if they did...and I shall repeat myself...currently they don't have the naval and air support and the 10 million well trained and supplied solidiers it would take to invade this nation.Do you think china, russia, or Iran would be interested in contributing to the U.N. in this circumstance?
Only when I was playing paranoid nutcases. It's wise not to annoy them any more than neccessary.