U.S. Economy Added 203K Jobs In November, Unemployment Down To 7%

Leave it to Desh to take a thread on the economy and turn it into yet ANOTHER derailment with her 'Reps cheat in elections'.

gee, did you ever wonder how where those super safe repug districts come from? the ones that the scotus is starting to look at?

the people that passed the jim crow laws must be laughing in their graves. the repugs will do anything that they can to try and keep a majority in the house and get a majority in the senate. they really hate obama...for obvious reasons.

as for the economy, it is slowly improving contrary to everything that the repugs have tried.

oh well
 
gee, did you ever wonder how where those super safe repug districts come from? the ones that the scotus is starting to look at?

the people that passed the jim crow laws must be laughing in their graves. the repugs will do anything that they can to try and keep a majority in the house and get a majority in the senate. they really hate obama...for obvious reasons.

as for the economy, it is slowly improving contrary to everything that the repugs have tried.

oh well

The Republicans want to win control of the Senate because they hate Obama? Did they not want to win control of the House or Senate under any other Presidents?

Do you think there are not super safe Democratic congressional districts?
 
gee, did you ever wonder how where those super safe repug districts come from? the ones that the scotus is starting to look at?

The same place as the super safe dem seats?

the people that passed the jim crow laws must be laughing in their graves. the repugs will do anything that they can to try and keep a majority in the house and get a majority in the senate. they really hate obama...for obvious reasons.

Both parties do everything they can to win control of the House and Senate (not to mention the WH)

You fall back on the skin pigmentation of Obama because that is the racist default of the left. Everything about skin color.

as for the economy, it is slowly improving contrary to everything that the repugs have tried.

oh well

funny, because it was the Dems that said sequestration would cause the economy to implode. Yet it hasn't. The markets responded favorably to government spending restraint (regardless of how small the effort)
 
The Republicans want to win control of the Senate because they hate Obama? Did they not want to win control of the House or Senate under any other Presidents?

Do you think there are not super safe Democratic congressional districts?

not as badly as they want to prevent obama to have any achievement.

true, they always want control of congress, but more now than ever, plus the white house

however, their base and demographic are shrinking throughout most of the nation and the only way they can keep or increase their power is through gerrymandering and passing voter restriction laws

they have ignored their own autopsy from the last election because they are afraid of being 'primarried' by the ultra conservatives that are using the same techniques that were tried in ca and have destroyed the rep party in ca. dims have the governor and control (2/3 majority) of both the assembly and senate.

oh well
 
not as badly as they want to prevent obama to have any achievement.

true, they always want control of congress, but more now than ever, plus the white house

however, their base and demographic are shrinking throughout most of the nation and the only way they can keep or increase their power is through gerrymandering and passing voter restriction laws

they have ignored their own autopsy from the last election because they are afraid of being 'primarried' by the ultra conservatives that are using the same techniques that were tried in ca and have destroyed the rep party in ca. dims have the governor and control (2/3 majority) of both the assembly and senate.

oh well

Do you honestly think the Democrats gerrymander any less than the Republicans do? Or there has been a Presidential race where the Republicans (or Democrats) are essentially thinking 'we'll run an opponent but we'll basically sit this one out because controlling the White House for the next four just isn't that important to us right now?'
 
The same place as the super safe dem seats?



Both parties do everything they can to win control of the House and Senate (not to mention the WH)

You fall back on the skin pigmentation of Obama because that is the racist default of the left. Everything about skin color.



funny, because it was the Dems that said sequestration would cause the economy to implode. Yet it hasn't. The markets responded favorably to government spending restraint (regardless of how small the effort)

the sequestration is not doing as much harm as was originally expected, however, both the dims and repugs are unhappy because it is cutting military/government jobs/spending in their districts.
 
Do you honestly think the Democrats gerrymander any less than the Republicans do? Or there has been a Presidential race where the Republicans (or Democrats) are essentially thinking 'we'll run an opponent but we'll basically sit this one out because controlling the White House for the next four just isn't that important to us right now?'

more and more scotus or lower courts are stepping in and demanding redistricting (they did it in ca and the dims wound up the winners contrary to dim and repug expectations)

in case you overlooked it, more voters blame the government shutdown on the repugs than the dims.

oh well
 
more and more scotus or lower courts are stepping in and demanding redistricting (they did it in ca and the dims wound up the winners contrary to dim and repug expectations)

in case you overlooked it, more voters blame the government shutdown on the repugs than the dims.

oh well

I fully support taking redistricting out of the hands of politicians. I supported in 2005 (or whatever year it was) when Arnold put it on the special ballot in California and it didn't pass. I don't care if it benefits the Democrats. I support(ed) it on principle.

You didn't answer if you think Democrats gerrymander any less than the Republicans do or has any party said they don't think a Presidential election is important and not put up a fight for it?

And what does saying the public blames the Republicans for the shut down have to do with what we are discussing?
 
the sequestration is not doing as much harm as was originally expected, however, both the dims and repugs are unhappy because it is cutting military/government jobs/spending in their districts.

I could care less if the idiots in DC are happy or not. We have to cut defense spending and eliminate waste. That is a fact the politicians will have to deal with.
 
more and more scotus or lower courts are stepping in and demanding redistricting (they did it in ca and the dims wound up the winners contrary to dim and repug expectations)

in case you overlooked it, more voters blame the government shutdown on the repugs than the dims.

oh well

Every district should be mandated to have right angles. As close to rectangles/squares as you can make them to have a similar population level. safe seats for the two parties simply allow more extremists from the left and right to get elected. Part of why we have seen growing polarization in DC for the past twenty years or so.
 
Every district should be mandated to have right angles. As close to rectangles/squares as you can make them to have a similar population level. safe seats for the two parties simply allow more extremists from the left and right to get elected. Part of why we have seen growing polarization in DC for the past twenty years or so.
states such as Maine with population densities that run tha gamut from Downtown Portland to unincorporated townships way up in the county make your idea a pipe dream.
 
states such as Maine with population densities that run tha gamut from Downtown Portland to unincorporated townships way up in the county make your idea a pipe dream.

No, they do not. You understand of course that every portion of the state is going to be in a district? That is a must... you do understand that don't you?
 
http://articles.latimes.com/1986-10-25/news/mn-7435_1_republican-national-committee


how is THIS not fact?




GOP Memo Admits Plan Could 'Keep Black Vote Down'

October 25, 1986|From the Washington Post




NEWARK, N.J. — A Republican National Committee official calculated that a so-called ballot security program in Louisiana "could keep the black vote down considerably," according to documents released in federal court Friday.

The documents and court hearing were the latest developments in a controversy over the GOP's ballot program that Democrats maintain is aimed at reducing minority turnout. The Republicans say the program's sole purpose is to purge ineligible voters from voting roles.





In an Aug. 13 memo the court made public Friday, Kris Wolfe, the Republican National Committee Midwest political director, wrote Lanny Griffith, the committee's Southern political director, and said of the Louisiana campaigning:

"I know this race is really important to you. I would guess that this program will eliminate at least 60-80,000 folks from the rolls. . . . If it's a close race . . . which I'm assuming it is, this could keep the black vote down considerably."

Unseals Document

She said in the memorandum that the program had been approved by Gregory Graves, deputy political director of the National Republican Senatorial Committee.



27 Y E A R S A G O Get the fuck over it already......

ballot security program--a method of assuring that voters reside at their listed addresses

I still see nothing illegal or unethical about this program, and it would affect EVERYONE, not just minorities.....

Do you think its ok for a voter to freakin' lie about where he lives ?

Democrats have gotten away with election cheating for 75 years, its time to put a stop to it.
 
the top 20% needs to pay more taxes

Why? How will that make anything better for ANYONE? Again, we do not have a REVENUE problem in this country, or any other for that matter. What we have is a SPENDING problem thanks to corrupt unscrupulous politicians who know they can dupe ignorant voters by promising them something for nothing.

I am always amazed by the clueless argument that if we force a tiny percentage of others to pay even more to the Federal Government who will piss it away, this will lead to better outcomes for everyone.

it used to be that the middle class paid the most in taxes, but the middle class is diminishing and the revenue needs to come from somewhere

The middle class has NEVER paid the lion’s share of the taxes in this nation. It has always been the top 6 percent of earners who have paid and still pay the lions share.

What is increasing is the percentage of Americans who pay NOTHING; that is now 46.9% and growing.

Read; become informed instead of a parrot for moronic DNC talking points.

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/11/who-pays-the-taxes-in-the-usa/

So the bulk of the U.S. tax burden is carried by only about half of the nation's households and taxpayers.

According to statistics provided by the Internal Revenue Service, U.S. taxpayers paid at the following rate in 2008, the most recent year for which comprehensive figures are available. The data was updated in 2010.

The top 1%, ranked by adjusted gross income of at least $380,354, paid 38.02% of federal personal income taxes.

The top 5%, ranked by adjusted gross income of at least $159,619, paid 58.72% of federal income taxes.

The top 10%, ranked by adjusted gross income of at least $113,799, paid 69.94% of federal income taxes.

The top 25%, ranked by adjusted gross income of at least $67,280, paid 86.34% of federal income taxes.

The top 50%, ranked by adjusted gross income of at least $33,048, paid 97.30% of federal income taxes.

The bottom 50%, ranked by adjusted gross income of less than $33,048, paid 2.7% of federal income taxes.


http://www.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0811/taxes-who-pays-and-how-much.aspx
 
gee, did you ever wonder how where those super safe repug districts come from? the ones that the scotus is starting to look at?

the people that passed the jim crow laws must be laughing in their graves. the repugs will do anything that they can to try and keep a majority in the house and get a majority in the senate. they really hate obama...for obvious reasons.

as for the economy, it is slowly improving contrary to everything that the repugs have tried.

oh well

Ran a bullshit check on this commentary and it pegged the needle. Are Liberals really THAT incredibly stupid?
 
not as badly as they want to prevent obama to have any achievement.

true, they always want control of congress, but more now than ever, plus the white house

however, their base and demographic are shrinking throughout most of the nation and the only way they can keep or increase their power is through gerrymandering and passing voter restriction laws

they have ignored their own autopsy from the last election because they are afraid of being 'primarried' by the ultra conservatives that are using the same techniques that were tried in ca and have destroyed the rep party in ca. dims have the governor and control (2/3 majority) of both the assembly and senate.

oh well

The sad reality for Liberals who parrot this moronic claim is that Obama got just about everything he wanted his first two years in office. The FACT that it has been a disaster and buried the American people in a trillion dollars of deficits and nearly $18 trillion in debt can correctly be placed squarely on the Democrats shoulders who controlled the House and the Senate from 2007 through 2010 and took a deficit from $161 billion to over $1.4 trillion in less than three years.

The sad truth is that while the unemployment rate has been declining, so have labor participation rates indicating that the ONLY reason for the lower unemployment rate is because so many have just given up looking for a job. The REAL unemployment rate is around 14% and for young blacks its around 22%.

Are Liberals really THAT uninformed and partisan? Democrats don't give a shit about anyone other than sustaining their political power and desperately trying to ensure it by embracing low information fools who either want something for nothing or think they care more than anyone else on the planet. Yes, the Democratic Party is THAT repugnant.
 
the sequestration is not doing as much harm as was originally expected, however, both the dims and repugs are unhappy because it is cutting military/government jobs/spending in their districts.

In other words, all of Obama's fear mongering over the issue and over the Government shutdown were lies intended to dupe gullible dimwits; got it. ;)
 
Back
Top