Agreed. Democrats always imply that most money from billionaires goes to Republicans. Hillary spent twice the money as Trump and much of that came from wealthy donors including corporations.
U.S. Voters Don’t Want Socialist or Very Old President: Poll
- Thread starter anonymoose
- Start date
Agreed. Democrats always imply that most money from billionaires goes to Republicans. Hillary spent twice the money as Trump and much of that came from wealthy donors including corporations.
Bernies average donor in 37 bucks. Warren is taking no money from the wealthy and corporations. Do you always make things up? The Repubs are the party of rich white men. Will Daffy refuse mega-rich donors? I can't believe I typed that. He is a taker and lover of the wealthy. I suppose his tax cut for the wealthy and corporations was missed by you?
Agreed, you are wrong. https://www.forbes.com/sites/katias...milies-republicans-or-democrats/#313279833e83 Top 50 richest families. 28 mainly Repbs. 7 mainly Dems 15 to both. We do not imply it. We state it and prove it.
This only applies to the 50 richest families. Those are a small percent of the wealthy in American and a small portion of all donors.
The U. S. has 11 million millionaires (700,000 were added in 2017).
A better indicator is looking at the campaign contribution reports. Many of the top corporations gave to Hillary in 2016.
Democrats are very good at skirting the system through PACs.
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
Hmmm... now why would the Wall Street Journal claim people don't want a Socialist president?
That may be your mindset when you vote, but those that have a tendency to make excuses also tend to look at things in a negative way.
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
Same reason NBC did. It's what their poll came up with.
cawacko
Well-known member
Interesting the emotion that comes out of you defending her almost as if she is a family member. I think that emotion is what led you to make the claim that if you haven’t been found guilty of something in court (in your life) you are an honest person. Think about that statement.
And you choose to completely ignore what people on the left have said about her trust worthiness. Easier for you to compartmentalism your defense of the Clinton’s when you say it’s only right wing haters. You come from blind partisan support. Again the irony is you are the same as many Trump supporters.
You know you can actually look this shit up. https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/top-recipients Aren't you upset that everything you believe is wrong? You do not have to stay that way. Turn off Fox and do some readiing.
Soros is very good at hiding contributions.
I post facts. You ignore them.
What is your explanation when the black BOY lost over 60 in 2010? Republicans gained seats in the Senate. Obama lost there, too.
Nope. 12 investigations, run by Republicans came up with nothing. The conclusion is simple logic. She did nothing wrong. If she had done the smallest crime, the Repubs would have prosecuted of Fox Gnus, prime time. Call me blind? Then point out what I missed . Of course you have missed the conclusions made by a dozen Repub investigations. The one being blind and missing things, is you.
Nope, nothing emotional on my side. I just give you the facts. All the emotional attachment is on your side, and all the anger.
Last edited:
cawacko
Well-known member
FFS Nordberg. It’s like talking a wall
Who said there were any excuses? That's the premise of your question so you assumed any were being made.
Now, what is your excuse for the black BOY losing more than 60?
No he isn't. Donations are reported to the government. You are such a low-level conspiracy nut. Open Secrets will give it to you. You just believe. How sad.
I use them, too! Great source