Unreasonable searches and seizures

Evmetro said:
Yea, I should probably mix "deflecting" into the evasion words. Dodge, deflect, divert, convert, invert, ignore, redefine, or otherwise evade. Deflect looks right at home in that description of how lefties respond to thread topics. Watch for any lefties who post or have posted on this thread, and compare their post to the opening post. It will not demonstrate that they have read and understand it, but it WILL be an example of "dodge, deflect, divert, convert, invert, ignore, redefine, or otherwise evade".
Click to expand...
That, of course, was your version of a gish gallop.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
rjhenn said:
Two negatives is obviously two too many for you to handle. And that's probably too many "two"s[too]s for you.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Hey, you reverted back to English. Good job! Some punctuation and spacing issues, but I will let those slide as that was likely keyboard fat-fingering.
 
Evmetro said:
Looks like a couple lefties picked up on this thread, but then threw it back when they realized it was a hot potato.
Click to expand...

Nope, because it is stupid. You are making up shit to stir up rightys. That is so easy to do. Leftys read the thread and think" he is at it again, What a dolt", Then go on.
 
Gonzomin said:
Why do you do that? do you think that was a rebuttal? It is not.
Click to expand...

Yes, it is. I have already explained the underlying point in previous posts, and your last bit was a logic error known as the bulverism fallacy. You are dismissing the argument because it is Evmetro who is making it.
 
gfm7175 said:
Yes, it is. I have already explained the underlying point in previous posts, and your last bit was a logic error known as the bulverism fallacy. You are dismissing the argument because it is Evmetro who is making it.
Click to expand...
When has evmetro ever presented a valid argument?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top