VERDICT!

Professor Baxter said:
Especially when you have done something to provoke someone or make them defensive, like follow them around in the dark. Stand your ground is fine in many circumstances. But it should not be allowed to be abused and if you can instigate a fight and then use it as a justification for killing someone, I am afraid it will be.

I don't understand why the state did not insist on including the "aggressor" exception in the jury instructions. Or if they did ask for it why it was not included.
Click to expand...

Like a lot of legislation it can sound very good in theory but it's actual application can be anything but.


http://www.tampabay.com/news/public...s-some-shocking-outcomes-depending-on/1233133
 
SJJRSJJS said:
Says me Fool, Trayvon made the racist statement "Creepy Ass Cracker", that makes your boy/child a racist. Trayvon rolled the dice, snake eyes, when he hit Zimmer in the nose and then mounted him, to do his Thuggy thing, but Zimmer had a legal gun and was forced to use it. I would have double tapped Trayvon's ass, but Zimmer didn't, which again proves that Zimmer never really wanted to shoot Trayvon's ass dead. Zimmer will sue the Feds, NBA, CNN, and Corey, make millions, and ya'all will not get anything, no reparations. All of you MF'ers cannot go mano o mano with yours truely, because I will cyber lobotomize your asses one by one TOUCH'....LOL...I win, post on, bring it!!!!!!
Click to expand...
are you insane? You'd have to be. What would Trayvon's comments have anything to do with what transpired? Nothing.. Oh, that Trayvon had a gun and fired first, what an uproar there would be.
Zimmerman was and is a punk sissy coward and so are you. You wouldn't have done shit, but got your ass justifiably "beat" for following someone who wasn't bothering you, or in fact, anyone.
And bitch, I've already proved, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you don't have the mental fortitude to keep up
with, let alone, match me. Cretin.
 
Rana said:
I accept it just like I did Casey Anthony's and OJ Simpson's because there is nothing else to be done. Do I think justice was served, absolutely not.
Click to expand...
You peoples got your trial, but you lost, so now you want yet another trial, like a bunch of sour grape whiners. I have tried to see the Left viewpoint, with my Moderation declaration, but you Libs are still acting like Loony Toones and this behavior with the Zimmer verdict prooves it, Beech Beech Beech, that is all I'm hearing on TV. Before the verdict, the prosecution was a sure winner, with that Hollywood Hunk of a Lawyer doing his closing statement, that is all I heard before the verdict, but now the prosecution messed up, didn't do their thing.
 
Professor Baxter said:
Especially when you have done something to provoke someone or make them defensive, like follow them around in the dark. Stand your ground is fine in many circumstances. But it should not be allowed to be abused and if you can instigate a fight and then use it as a justification for killing someone, I am afraid it will be.

I don't understand why the state did not insist on including the "aggressor" exception in the jury instructions. Or if they did ask for it why it was not included.
Click to expand...
Being followed is not a pass for assault and battery.

What do you think would happen to you if you jumped on someone, beat the shit out of them, and told the cops they followed you? Do you think they'd say, "no problem, move along....."?
 
Susie Chutzpah said:
Being followed is not a pass for assault and battery.

What do you think would happen to you if you jumped on someone, beat the shit out of them, and told the cops they followed you? Do you think they'd say, "no problem, move along....."?
Click to expand...

how about if you shot them spo they could not tell their side of the story
 
poet said:
are you insane? You'd have to be. What would Trayvon's comments have anything to do with what transpired? Nothing.. Oh, that Trayvon had a gun and fired first, what an uproar there would be.
Zimmerman was and is a punk sissy coward and so are you. You wouldn't have done shit, but got your ass justifiably "beat" for following someone who wasn't bothering you, or in fact, anyone.
And bitch, I've already proved, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you don't have the mental fortitude to keep up
with, let alone, match me. Cretin.
Click to expand...
I know who you are Fool, I whompted you routinely on the old Board, and nothing has changed except your name. You know that I know who you is. You are still a jive turkey of a jackass fool, FOOL.
 
evince said:
where is you proof trayvon swung first?
Click to expand...

You don't really understand the law. It's based on "innocent until proven guilty."

The defense didn't need to prove that TM swung first. They just had to create enough doubt about the situation, so that it was possible that he may have swung first.
 
poet said:
LOL
Click to expand...
When you defeet someone and all they got for a reply is "LOL", you know that you won the verbal contest, and I know that I won this here. There will be no more trials FOOL, because Trayvon's thuggery will be revealed to America, this time around, if they keep on pushin. PS, I know that Howey will read this because he is my little poochie DOG who follows me around, almost like he is stalking me, maybe he "wants" me?...LOL
 
poet said:
are you insane? You'd have to be. What would Trayvon's comments have anything to do with what transpired? Nothing.. Oh, that Trayvon had a gun and fired first, what an uproar there would be.
Zimmerman was and is a punk sissy coward and so are you. You wouldn't have done shit, but got your ass justifiably "beat" for following someone who wasn't bothering you, or in fact, anyone.
And bitch, I've already proved, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you don't have the mental fortitude to keep up
with, let alone, match me. Cretin.
Click to expand...

So you wouldn't be suspicious if someone was in your neighborhood that didnt belong? I would. And I would follow them. But I am always packing.
 
Susie Chutzpah said:
Being followed is not a pass for assault and battery.

What do you think would happen to you if you jumped on someone, beat the shit out of them, and told the cops they followed you? Do you think they'd say, "no problem, move along....."?
Click to expand...

Strawman. I did not say it was a pass. If you go up to some guy at a bar and call his wife a bunch of vicious names, it's not a pass for assault and battery either. It is reasonable to expect that he will respond in some way, though, and i don't think your right to claim a justifiable use of deadly force is then the same as some guy who is randomly attacked.
 
Thing1 said:
You don't really understand the law. It's based on "innocent until proven guilty."

The defense didn't need to prove that TM swung first. They just had to create enough doubt about the situation, so that it was possible that he may have swung first.
Click to expand...

And that is part of the problem. Zimmerman acted in a way that provoked a response. He followed, never identified himself and then started reaching for his pockets. This is all according to his own testimony.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top