Views of the 139K found votes fraud from an Election Judge...

Damocles

Damocles

Accedo!
Staff member
There is no link to this, I am the source for this. It is my opinion based on facts I will outline in this post.

First let me set the stage for why I believe what I am going to write here (and it probably isn't what you think...):

1. At each stage of counting there are election judges for both parties present. These are very often the most partisan folks you will meet, they believe in what they are doing and they are doing it to make sure that everybody follows the law. The Ds are there to make sure that Rs do not cheat and vice versa.. The Rs clearly are there to make sure that the other side doesn't cheat. They are the ones that check signatures, etc. and run the ballots (here in CO they are paper ballots) through the machines.
2. At each stage of counting, if folks were following law, there are poll observers from each campaign as well as each party in there watching the process as well. (observers and judges play different rolls and if you want me to I can get into that later).

The conspiracy:

They tell me that they suddenly just "found" 139,000 votes in PA for Biden that first night and that they ran these through the machine without finding even one Trump vote at 3AM when nobody was there...

If that really did happen those republican election judges that were either kicked out for that part of it or who witnessed it would be flat telling everybody. Again, these people are partisan, they are largely not squishy folks or RINOs/DINOs... There would be folks like me telling you why I believed those folks, but they aren't out there, they aren't talking, and nobody is telling you even those republican election judges that were there are not saying it, that this happened.

So, IMHO, based on the facts that I list above and my own observations, that one simply did not happen. If it happened here I would be telling you that it did, and if it happened there judges there would be telling you that it happened as well.

While there may have been fraud this "votes dumped into the count" claim simply is not true based on evidence I have seen.

Now, if we find that these election judges have been quietly sitting there waiting to be witnesses in lawsuits for Trump then maybe I'll think differently, but not at this time.
 
Damocles said:
There is no link to this, I am the source for this. It is my opinion based on facts I will outline in this post.

First let me set the stage for why I believe what I am going to write here (and it probably isn't what you think...):

1. At each stage of counting there are election judges for both parties present. These are very often the most partisan folks you will meet, they believe in what they are doing and they are doing it to make sure that everybody follows the law. The Ds are there to make sure that Rs do not cheat and vice versa.. The Rs clearly are there to make sure that the other side doesn't cheat. They are the ones that check signatures, etc. and run the ballots (here in CO they are paper ballots) through the machines.
2. At each stage of counting, if folks were following law, there are poll observers from each campaign as well as each party in there watching the process as well. (observers and judges play different rolls and if you want me to I can get into that later).

The conspiracy:

They tell me that they suddenly just "found" 139,000 votes in PA for Biden that first night and that they ran these through the machine without finding even one Trump vote at 3AM when nobody was there...

If that really did happen those republican election judges that were either kicked out for that part of it or who witnessed it would be flat telling everybody. Again, these people are partisan, they are largely not squishy folks or RINOs/DINOs... There would be folks like me telling you why I believed those folks, but they aren't out there, they aren't talking, and nobody is telling you even those republican election judges that were there are not saying it, that this happened.

So, IMHO, based on the facts that I list above and my own observations, that one simply did not happen. If it happened here I would be telling you that it did, and if it happened there judges there would be telling you that it happened as well.

While there may have been fraud this "votes dumped into the count" claim simply is not true based on evidence I have seen.

Now, if we find that these election judges have been quietly sitting there waiting to be witnesses in lawsuits for Trump then maybe I'll think differently, but not at this time.
Click to expand...

lol

“They“ tell you, yet some still believe that BS
 
Damocles said:
There is no link to this, I am the source for this. It is my opinion based on facts I will outline in this post.

First let me set the stage for why I believe what I am going to write here (and it probably isn't what you think...):

1. At each stage of counting there are election judges for both parties present. These are very often the most partisan folks you will meet, they believe in what they are doing and they are doing it to make sure that everybody follows the law. The Ds are there to make sure that Rs do not cheat and vice versa.. The Rs clearly are there to make sure that the other side doesn't cheat. They are the ones that check signatures, etc. and run the ballots (here in CO they are paper ballots) through the machines.
2. At each stage of counting, if folks were following law, there are poll observers from each campaign as well as each party in there watching the process as well. (observers and judges play different rolls and if you want me to I can get into that later).

The conspiracy:

They tell me that they suddenly just "found" 139,000 votes in PA for Biden that first night and that they ran these through the machine without finding even one Trump vote at 3AM when nobody was there...

If that really did happen those republican election judges that were either kicked out for that part of it or who witnessed it would be flat telling everybody. Again, these people are partisan, they are largely not squishy folks or RINOs/DINOs... There would be folks like me telling you why I believed those folks, but they aren't out there, they aren't talking, and nobody is telling you even those republican election judges that were there are not saying it, that this happened.

So, IMHO, based on the facts that I list above and my own observations, that one simply did not happen. If it happened here I would be telling you that it did, and if it happened there judges there would be telling you that it happened as well.

While there may have been fraud this "votes dumped into the count" claim simply is not true based on evidence I have seen.

Now, if we find that these election judges have been quietly sitting there waiting to be witnesses in lawsuits for Trump then maybe I'll think differently, but not at this time.
Click to expand...

When you start with a false premise you can prove anything. Therefore your posit is rejected. It is not true that 139,000 ballots were suddenly 'found' and they had no Trump votes in them. That is a fabrication and your entire premise is based on it.

See how easy that was?

EDIT: You have correctly identified the flaw, so I am incorrect in saying YOUR posit is incorrect. You are actually spot on. Well done.
 
Concart said:
When you start with a false premise you can prove anything. Therefore your posit is rejected. It is not true that 139,000 ballots were suddenly 'found' and they had no Trump votes in them. That is a fabrication and your entire premise is based on it.

See how easy that was?

EDIT: You have correctly identified the flaw, so I am incorrect in saying YOUR posit is incorrect. You are actually spot on. Well done.
Click to expand...

Oh, you caught yourself. The ballots need to be audited. I bet some say Mickey Mouse and a bunch are unsigned with only Biden checked.
 
Matt Dillon said:
Oh, you caught yourself. The ballots need to be audited. I bet some say Mickey Mouse and a bunch are unsigned with only Biden checked.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I wasn't clear on what he was claiming as his opinion, but that was my error not his. He's right, and that's a very common sense answer. You should try it some time.
 
Concart said:
Yeah, I wasn't clear on what he was claiming as his opinion, but that was my error not his. He's right, and that's a very common sense answer. You should try it some time.
Click to expand...

I guess as long as you got a black whore as VP you're OK.
 
Concart said:
When you start with a false premise you can prove anything. Therefore your posit is rejected. It is not true that 139,000 ballots were suddenly 'found' and they had no Trump votes in them. That is a fabrication and your entire premise is based on it.

See how easy that was?

EDIT: You have correctly identified the flaw, so I am incorrect in saying YOUR posit is incorrect. You are actually spot on. Well done.
Click to expand...

LOL. I told you, it is not what you think. That's all good though.
 
Matt Dillon said:
Here's another thought: Most of the officials in Detroit are on the take.
Click to expand...

This might be true, but even with that not every election judge would be. If they were doing what they claim with the ballots, election judges would be telling you all about it. Even in Michigan, even if the County Clerk was "on the take" these people still exist there and still would be absolutely telling you all about it.
 
Matt Dillon said:
Oh, you caught yourself. The ballots need to be audited. I bet some say Mickey Mouse and a bunch are unsigned with only Biden checked.
Click to expand...

Yes, a manual recount is what I'd ask for in these areas. In GA, MI, and in PA specifically in the counties where the vote count just kept going forever and ever... Like a country song.. "Forever and Ever, until Biden's the winner, Amen"... LOL

Anyway, it isn't what they are saying, it can't be because election judges exist even in Philadelphia...
 
Damocles said:
There is no link to this, I am the source for this. It is my opinion based on facts I will outline in this post.

First let me set the stage for why I believe what I am going to write here (and it probably isn't what you think...):

1. At each stage of counting there are election judges for both parties present. These are very often the most partisan folks you will meet, they believe in what they are doing and they are doing it to make sure that everybody follows the law. The Ds are there to make sure that Rs do not cheat and vice versa.. The Rs clearly are there to make sure that the other side doesn't cheat. They are the ones that check signatures, etc. and run the ballots (here in CO they are paper ballots) through the machines.
2. At each stage of counting, if folks were following law, there are poll observers from each campaign as well as each party in there watching the process as well. (observers and judges play different rolls and if you want me to I can get into that later).

The conspiracy:

They tell me that they suddenly just "found" 139,000 votes in PA for Biden that first night and that they ran these through the machine without finding even one Trump vote at 3AM when nobody was there...

If that really did happen those republican election judges that were either kicked out for that part of it or who witnessed it would be flat telling everybody. Again, these people are partisan, they are largely not squishy folks or RINOs/DINOs... There would be folks like me telling you why I believed those folks, but they aren't out there, they aren't talking, and nobody is telling you even those republican election judges that were there are not saying it, that this happened.

So, IMHO, based on the facts that I list above and my own observations, that one simply did not happen. If it happened here I would be telling you that it did, and if it happened there judges there would be telling you that it happened as well.

While there may have been fraud this "votes dumped into the count" claim simply is not true based on evidence I have seen.

Now, if we find that these election judges have been quietly sitting there waiting to be witnesses in lawsuits for Trump then maybe I'll think differently, but not at this time.
Click to expand...

They are out there, and they are saying what is happening.
 
Damocles said:
Yes, a manual recount is what I'd ask for in these areas. In GA, MI, and in PA specifically in the counties where the vote count just kept going forever and ever... Like a country song.. "Forever and Ever, until Biden's the winner, Amen"... LOL

Anyway, it isn't what they are saying, it can't be because election judges exist even in Philadelphia...
Click to expand...

I think you're thinking of a ..George..no..Randy Travis song.

"I'm gonna count votes forever....forever 'til Biden wins."
 
Concart said:
When you start with a false premise you can prove anything. Therefore your posit is rejected. It is not true that 139,000 ballots were suddenly 'found' and they had no Trump votes in them. That is a fabrication and your entire premise is based on it.

See how easy that was?

EDIT: You have correctly identified the flaw, so I am incorrect in saying YOUR posit is incorrect. You are actually spot on. Well done.
Click to expand...

Sorry dude, the count history shows otherwise. It's not a false premise.
 
Concart said:
Yeah, I wasn't clear on what he was claiming as his opinion, but that was my error not his. He's right, and that's a very common sense answer. You should try it some time.
Click to expand...

You are not making common sense. You are making assumption of victory fallacy.
 
Affidavits in hand stating that voting machines were connected to the internet. A no no for obvious reasons.

There is quite a lot more that will be getting delivered to courts in a number if states. Maybe the media will report it, prolly not.
 
Damocles said:
LOL. I told you, it is not what you think. That's all good though.
Click to expand...

I had to do a double take. Still, I appreciate it when people present a thought out argument. You are precisely correct about what you said. Big thumbs up. And not because we agree or disagree, but because the position comes from place of truth. I'd love to see more of that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top