Into the Night
Verified User
Some do. Ethernet is not internet.
Views of the 139K found votes fraud from an Election Judge...
- Thread starter Damocles
- Start date
Some do. Ethernet is not internet.
Into the Night
Verified User
Wifi is not the internet either.
“Lie. The evidence is there,” only no one can produce that evidence, it’s just out there, everybody knows it, it is somewhere, it’s metaphysically floating in the Rudisphere
Ah, ten lawsuits already canned prove there is no evidence, just accusations and innuendo, you don’t have evidence until you can prove it, so your inane “victory fallacy” is idiocy, learn what “common sense” means
Into the Night
Verified User
The evidence has already been produced.
Nope. It's real.
Argument from randU fallacy. All but one lawsuits haven't been ruled on yet. That single exception was not 'canned'. It was a lawsuit to stop counting. It was dismissed because counting had already stopped.
Attempted negative proof. Affirming a disjunct fallacy.
Evidence is not a proof. Affirming a disjunct fallacy.
Denial of logic. Assumption of victory fallacy.
You don't have it.
No argument presented.
These were.
Into the Night
Verified User
Then they should be programmed to connect to a wifi that isn't on the internet. There is no reason for them to be on an internet wifi. You cannot cast a vote through that port anyway. It is used to report votes, not cast them. If it is not connected to the correct network, it cannot report votes to the election system. An election official hooking one up this way is only committing fraud. The Russians still can't vote through such a machine.
Last edited:
The evidence has been FOUND!
Along with Trump’s healthcare plan!
Along with Trump’s healthcare plan!
If they were there Trump would be using them as witnesses. If they're out there he is either totally incapable of finding them and using their offered up evidence, or they aren't what you think they are.
I have to believe that the lawyers hired by a president are able to understand what valuable evidence these folks would be, otherwise I have to believe that the President only hires folks that are not able to do their jobs. At this point, if these folks existed, we would hear from them as witnesses in the lawsuits. I'm still waiting.
The found ballots are a false premise as is the assumption that each voting precinct has both a D and R observer. It is very difficult to find a sufficient number of poll workers. Finding observers is even more difficult.
The evidence has been FOUND!
Along with Trump’s healthcare plan!
At the end of the 60 Minute interview with Trump the press secretary handed Lesley Stahl a large book and said it was the health care plan. I haven't heard any more about it.
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
bottom line for trump
Not just observers, both parties have election judges at each point. The party itself approves the judges and accepts applications for it (here in CO we do at least) at the caucuses. We get a list and then we work with the clerk and recorder of the county to select correct judges that will represent us fairly and the Ds do the same. The election judges are the ones that look at sigs, approve them, etc. then put the ballot into the machines. Observers can look at things like the voter roles list to see if there is somebody they can contact to get more votes in, they can see the ballot but cannot "object" and get a vote that the judges have put into the machine thrown out, etc. They simply are there to watch the process, not participate in it. Objections must be filed using paper, and that kind of thing is ruled on later by folks above that "pay grade"...
All fluff no plan
cancel2 2022
Canceled
There are several ways to access them.
https://medium.com/@jennycohn1/all-...d-including-through-the-internet-8d054645e860