Little lizard, I have noticed over the weeks you go in and out of hate rage posts. Is it the weather, that time of the month, alcohol, or a med balance issue? Asking for a friend.
Violation of First Amendment?
- Thread starter AProudLefty
- Start date
Little lizard, I have noticed over the weeks you go in and out of hate rage posts. Is it the weather, that time of the month, alcohol, or a med balance issue? Asking for a friend.
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
No! That is where you are wrong!
I am dancing in the street, having fun calling you losers and haters out for what you are, while I watch you miserable people stew in your own SHIT!
Yes Sir! It's gonna' be a fun ride all the way to Steve Kornacki night!
What does "speech" mean?
moon
Satire for Sanity
Expression- in any medium.
Expression of what?
moon
Satire for Sanity
Anything at all.
Death threats to sitting President with plan of action?
The First Amendment protects freedom of expression (verbal and non-verbal) but the freedom of expression is not unlimited. In the particular type of public expression you are referring to here (i.e. pornographic) is prohibited under the 14th Amendment. The 14th Amendment does not permit lewd (sexually obscene) public expressions).
What it means is this...suppose that if you out driving in you car and a police cruiser pulls you over. The traffic cops say to you that you were speeding. You vehemently deny this and tell him there is no way you were driving over the speed limit. He doesn't listen to you and and simply writes out a ticket for a $eoo fine. After he hands you the ticket, you are not free to bend over, drop your panties, spread your pimply butt checks are bare your poxy bung-hole in the police officer's face in order to demonstrate your utter contempt for law enforcement . This is because exposing your naked butt in this manner constitutes lewd ( sexually obscene - especially in your case) conduct, and this behaviour is not a form of expression that protected by the first Amendment (due to the fact that it is outlawed under the 14th Amendment). You are free to express the feeling of contempt in countless different verbal, non-verbal and symbolic ways, but NOT like this (i.e. using behaviour that is LEWD). Another example is that I might be a sandal - wearing, long-hared, herbal, liberal who is a passional advocate of "free love" and the freedom to express the philosophy of "free love." If I was sitting with my girl friend one even in a busy, restaurant and I decided to bend her over a dining table and hoist her shirt and start poking her up the "Gary Glitter" my public expression of the philosophy of "free love" would not be protected by the First Amendment. Rather I would almost certainly be arrested by the local police and charged with lewd conduct in a public place/ or "moral terpitude."
Geddit Evince ?
Dachshund Dawg
Dachshund the Loyal TRUMPER Hound !!
moon
Satire for Sanity
Several members here have expressed their wish to kill Putin. Also Arafat, Gaddafi, Saddam, Morsi, Assad and Raisi. No action was taken.
So...you know nothing about the United States.
That goes beyond speech into conduct. As for speech, it’s never been anything goes. If we took the First Amendment literally there would be people yelling fire in crowded theaters for the fun of it, child porn on your TV, in other words a society no one wants, so the prohibition isn’t taken literally. It’s about as simple as that.
You also could not sue people for slander or liable.
No, just speech.
moon
Satire for Sanity
Ask me about the predominant formations of the Rocky Mountains and other regions in the Southwest.
You proved your ignorance of the US.
Threats are conduct.
No, speech.
If you are dancing in the street and shouting, I will assume it is alcohol that is causing your mad fits of anger.
How about the death threats you made toward your direct opposition?
See them as you like. Law treats threats as conduct.