Violence: An American Tradition (Part 1 of 6): You Tube

Aoxomoxoa said:
That's as may be, but there was a survey done in 2005 that found Wikipedia and the Encyclopedia Britannica to about the same with regards to accuracy for scientific topics, of course Wiki is much more likely to be up to date as well.
Click to expand...

But this is a political topic...
 
DamnYankee said:
But this is a political topic...
Click to expand...

I have already said that contentious entries are monitored and locked down if necessary to stop abuse. Go to the entries for Israel and George Bush for example, look in the top right hand corner and you will see a padlock icon which indicates that they has been locked down. A number of entries, like that for Ronald Reagan, have a gold star in the RH corner which indicates that they have been rigorously checked for accuracy, neutrality, completeness, and style.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reagan
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
I have already said that contentious entries are monitored and locked down if necessary to stop abuse. Go to the entries for Israel and George Bush for example, look in the top right hand corner and you will see a padlock icon which indicates that they has been locked down. A number of entries, like that for Ronald Reagan, have a gold star in the RH corner which indicates that they have been rigorously checked for accuracy, neutrality, completeness, and style.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reagan
Click to expand...

Funny, I don't see a gold star for Poet's wiki...
 
DamnYankee said:
Oh look, another ad hom when you can't debate. :)
Click to expand...

Really? And you think you can, with no stats citing support for your ridiculous claims...only your opinion, as fact???????????????????? LOL.
And you started ad hominem, when I first arrived. Live by the sword, die by it. You're certainly not smarter than I.
 
Last edited:
poet said:
Really? And you think you can, with no stats citing support for your ridiculous claims...only your opinion, as fact???????????????????? LOL.
And you started ad hominem, when I first arrived. Live by the sword, die by it. You're certainly not smarter than I.
Click to expand...

"Stats" for what? Are you fucking up again?
 
poet said:
You're mentally disturbed. There is conservative thinking and then there is the evil that was Joe McCarthy. Seek help.
Click to expand...

The only thing you know is what you read on left wing sites. Anything that challenges your indoctrination you dismiss without even looking at it. That is realy bad scholarship. A true scholar looks at everything and examines everything from all angles and then studies the evidence. That's why you're stupid.
 
Alias said:
The only thing you know is what you read on left wing sites. Anything that challenges your indoctrination you dismiss without even looking at it. That is realy bad scholarship. A true scholar looks at everything and examines everything from all angles and then studies the evidence. That's why you're stupid.
Click to expand...

The only thing more outstanding than your ignorance is your arrogance.
 
DamnYankee said:
I don't play the stats game, sorry. Try again. :)
Click to expand...
Well, sorry, but it's all you've got, seeing that you're no authority on anything. And if you can't back up your claims with stats...then you have absolutely nothing. But we knew that already. lol.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top