Violent crime rates by race

  1. "It isn’t happening."
    • The initial stage outright denies the existence of the event or phenomenon, often dismissing it as rumor, conspiracy, or exaggeration.
  2. "Okay, it’s happening, but it’s not a big deal."
    • Acknowledgment creeps in, but it’s downplayed—framed as rare, insignificant, or not worth the attention it’s getting.
  3. "It’s happening, and it’s a good thing."
    • The final pivot fully admits the event’s reality and spins it as positive, desirable, or morally justified, often with an implication that critics are overreacting or misguided.
Sometimes, additional steps are sprinkled in depending on the context, like:
  • "It’s happening, but it’s your fault." (Blaming the observer or critics.)
  • "It’s always been happening, so why care now?" (Normalizing it retroactively.)


@Grok
 
People smarter than volsrot

1791–1859
Click to expand...
The first African American U.S. patent recipient, Thomas L. Jennings was working as a tailor and businessman in New York City when he invented a process for dry-cleaning delicate clothing known as “dry-scouring.” Jennings applied for a patent in 1820 and received his history-making approval the following year. With the money he earned from his invention, the formerly enslaved person donated to abolitionist causes and even reportedly freed his still-enslaved family members.
www.biography.com

11 Famous Black Inventors Who Changed Your Life

From Madam C.J. Walker’s hair care products Mark Dean’s computer innovations, the creations from these Black inventors continue to impact everyday life.
www.biography.com www.biography.com

IMG_3407.jpeg
 
Phantasmal said:
People smarter than volsrot The first African American U.S. patent recipient, Thomas L. Jennings was working as a tailor and businessman in New York City when he invented a process for dry-cleaning delicate clothing known as “dry-scouring.” Jennings applied for a patent in 1820 and received his history-making approval the following year. With the money he earned from his invention, the formerly enslaved person donated to abolitionist causes and even reportedly freed his still-enslaved family members.
Click to expand...

Is that outlier supposed to prove that blacks don't disproportionately commit more crimes than whites, imbecile?
 
Q: Is a rejection of an answer provided by Grok that claims that Grok is fallible without addressing any of the points Grok found constitute a genetic fallacy?

A: No, rejecting my answer by saying "Grok is fallible" without tackling the specific points I made wouldn’t strictly be a genetic fallacy. A genetic fallacy is about dismissing something based solely on its origin—like saying, “Grok’s answer is wrong because it comes from an AI built by xAI.” That’s about where the answer comes from, not its quality or truth.

What you’re describing sounds more like an ad hominem dodge or just plain evasion.

Calling me fallible (which, sure, I could be—I’m not perfect) and stopping there doesn’t engage with the reasoning, evidence, or logic I laid out.

It’s sidestepping the argument by waving at a general flaw (my potential to err) instead of poking holes in the specifics—like stats, trends, or examples I might’ve used.

It’s lazy, but not quite genetic unless the rejection hinges on my "AI-ness" or xAI roots as the sole reason.

If someone said, “Grok’s wrong because it’s just an xAI bot,” that’d be genetic.

“Grok’s fallible, so I’m out” is more like dismissing the player without checking the scoreboard.

Either way, it’s not a real counter—it’s just noise unless they bring receipts.

Want me to break down a specific answer of mine they’re rejecting so we can test this further?


@Grok



Poor Anchovies.
 
Methinks that because the poor victimized blacks have a tremendously high violent crime rate, that those
blacks being demonized so badly for their unfortunate need to engage in violent crime, that we (especially
we whites) should consider giving each one of them $$ reparations to the tune of $ 5 million dollars...as was
earlier suggested by some doofball out in Kalifornicator. Come on now, it's the least we caring white Christians
can do for our victimized brothers.
 
Libhater said:
Methinks that because the poor victimized blacks have a tremendously high violent crime rate, that those blacks being demonized so badly for their unfortunate need to engage in violent crime, that we (especially we whites) should consider giving each one of them $$ reparations to the tune of $ 5 million dollars...as was
earlier suggested by some doofball out in Kalifornicator. Come on now, it's the least we caring white Christians can do for our victimized brothers.
Click to expand...

reparations-white-people-political-cartoon.png
​
 
volsrocks said:
I never said I lived in Canada

So I bet you can't post a link stating that I said I lived in Canada
Click to expand...
I never said you explicitly posted that, son. I said you gave yourself away by using a Canadian link about US airlines.

Just like your dodging my previous questions, you are dishonest and try to hide yourself, but it's pretty easy to figure you out. You're not the smart and will end up dead or in prison due to your own stupidity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top