Into the Night
Verified User
There is nothing controlled about wildfire. I don't consider a hijacked aircraft a 'controlled demolition' either.
Was 9/11 an inside job?
- Thread starter thethinkertank
- Start date
Buildings do not collapse the way they did from an airplane striking them and building 7 was not even struck by a plane.
False Flag Event:
- Intentional deception: False Flag events are deliberately staged or manipulated to create a false narrative, often to achieve a specific political, strategic, or ideological goal.
- Pre-planned and orchestrated: False Flag events are carefully planned and executed to deceive the public, often involving multiple actors and a coordinated effort.
- Attribution of blame: False Flag events aim to shift blame or responsibility to a specific group, individual, or nation, often to justify a particular course of action or policy.
- Focus on the narrative: The primary focus is on the constructed narrative, including the attribution of blame, rather than the event itself. (Source: Brave AI)
Into the Night
Verified User
Iron lattice buildings do (which is how the World Trade Center buildings were designed).
Building 7 caught fire from the falling debris of the other buildings. It was completely burned out from the inside by wildfire before it also collapsed.
Flying burning debris set the interior of building 7 on fire.
What false flag? This is physics.
Iron lattice structures collapse due to massive fire. The WTC wasn't the first buildings to collapse this way...just the largest and most filmed.
The collapse started on the floors that were burning as a result of being hit by aircraft. The collapse cascaded in both directions from the initial point of failure.
You can't just drop a lattice structure 10 feet and expect it to remain standing.
Personally, I think you are being insulting. I knew one of the people on the 2nd plane that went in.
Steel softens when it's heated like that. Once one column slips out of position, it all comes down.
Okay chief, whatever you want to believe.
The buildings basically pulverized as well. There were also reports of multiple explosions ....as they were coming down, .... as is heard in a controlled demolition. That was even reported on live TV/Radio at the time, of course, since buried by big tech and big government.
Into the Night
Verified User
Trivializing won't work, Goyboy.
That's what happens to a lattice structure in a fire.
Collapse isn't an explosion.
You obviously have never been to controlled demolition. Controlled demolitions have no explosions as the building is collapsing. They all take place while the building is standing.
Ah. You are believing MSNBC. Get a life.
Nothing was buried. There are videos of the collapse everywhere. They are all a classic example of a lattice structure in a fire.
Like I said, the WTC isn't the first lattice structure collapse in fires. It was just the largest.
dancindave
Verified User
So after another some 50 years of Christian Nation SCOTUS Rehnquist Bicentennial Fourth Reich July human reproduction medical pseudoscience Federal Lynching KKK churchstate of hate drug trafficking fiefdom Christiananality pedophilia enforcement George Washington University Hospital, Washington, D.C. born USA citizens are Islam in “one nation under God with equal justice under law” where a GW University Hospital Washington, D.C. born USA citizen opinion of Islam is Mohammed flaming flying chariot pseudoscience pedophilia martyrdom of Christian Nation SCOTUS Rehnquist and those crooks on Capital Hill supreme swastika up Uranus national religion…..
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Let's take this in a different direction...
First, if it were a controlled demolition, was the plane hit at the Pentagon likewise a controlled demolition?
Was the fourth plane's target identified and checked for explosive devices that were to be used for a controlled demolition?
If not, why only use controlled demolition on the World Trade Center towers?
How much damage did the plane hits contribute to the towers collapsing?
Same question about the Pentagon.
How was the impact of the planes and subsequent demolition carried out if the area of the plane hits were so severly damaged that initiating the explosive devices at that level and above were carried out?
Since we know the planes hit at different levels, how could setting off previously emplaced explosives prematurely have been avoided?
First, if it were a controlled demolition, was the plane hit at the Pentagon likewise a controlled demolition?
Was the fourth plane's target identified and checked for explosive devices that were to be used for a controlled demolition?
If not, why only use controlled demolition on the World Trade Center towers?
How much damage did the plane hits contribute to the towers collapsing?
Same question about the Pentagon.
How was the impact of the planes and subsequent demolition carried out if the area of the plane hits were so severly damaged that initiating the explosive devices at that level and above were carried out?
Since we know the planes hit at different levels, how could setting off previously emplaced explosives prematurely have been avoided?