We are more divided today, than before Obama...

Well, the other forums I participated in, half of these people would have been banned already..But I understand that some forums may be a little more lax when it comes to blatant personal attack.



Well, isn't that convenient...Even having no side, is choosing sir or madam.



Already answered.



I think you forgot "is".



I don't think so. See I do see it coming from my ideological "side", but like I said usually after being goaded into it...I don't see a lot of conservatives starting a post with "shit fer brains"



Ok, here's your chance to show me...What are your critical thoughts on Socialism?

With all due respect, it's not my job or even my desire to "show you" the critical thinking on socialism. I'm not trying to recruit you. However, I will gladly have a conversation about it.

Start here .. socialism equals people first

Would free healthcare and education be a good idea?
 
Oh please!

You mean all those times Obama tried to reach across the aisle and had his hand bitten or slapped by partisan Righties was HIS fault?

He made it worse? Even though it was partisan Republicans who voted in lockstep against virtually every single proposal Obama put forth?

Racist Righties displaying posters of Obama made up to look like a witch doctor or a Muslim or even Hitler is Obama making things worse?

Take a gander at my sig line...each and everyone is a quote from a "tolerant" conservative who sure seems intent on "healing the divide in this country", so before you go blaming Obama for the divide in this country, maybe you should stop and address the outright racism directed at him since day 1.

Precisely.

The day a black man was elected, no strike that, the day a black man was nominated to run for President, a certain sub-group of citizens within this country went absolutely fucking bonkers.

They have spent the past three and a half years obstructing, criticizing, lying, and using every sneaky trick in the book to delegitimize the man who was elected president. When that didn't work they went even crazier and started questioning his birthplace, nationality, family, and education to continue their denial of his presidency. For the first time in history, the First Wife has become the target of slanderous, inane, and pointedly racist remarks.

At no juncture within our history has the divide been so obvious and the only reasonable explanation is because he's black.

It's become so bad we have people joining forums just so they can post chain emails, pass them off as truth; and then criticize others for rightfully calling them out.
 
Surely you can't be suggesting that conservatives are any worse at name-calling and rancor that are "liberals." Surely, surely that can't be your argument.

Equally confusing is that you seem to be suggesting the divide we see in this country can somehow be blamed on Obama and "liberals."

These are all partisan statements .. the REAL genesis of the divide we see.

In your country you only have two choices, if you dislike Obama so much then you will get Romney.
 
We live in a society. A society has costs. Some think the costs are worthwhile, some don't. I hear Somalia is looking for a few good free marketers.
It is funny however, how often those who most loudly protest society's costs freely partake in society's benefits.

America is not a socialist country.....yet.
 
There's no politician in America who is going to unite this country. It's just not going to happen. Any politician who claims they can is lying. I think the country as a whole can rally around events like after 9/11 or a particular athlete or team in the Olympics but that's it.

And when did calling the President a Nazi or Hitler become racist? Every President has been called that at some point but now because Obama is President it's racist? WTF is that?
 
With all due respect, it's not my job or even my desire to "show you" the critical thinking on socialism. I'm not trying to recruit you. However, I will gladly have a conversation about it.

Start here .. socialism equals people first

Would free healthcare and education be a good idea?

So, 'critical thought' = full throated support, and recruitment to said ideology?

Second question on free education, and HC. The short answer is no.

Now I have a question for you, on Health care for example, or any "social justice" scheme you have in mind. What is the nature of debt from Person A (the earner), to Person B (the recipient)?
 
There's no politician in America who is going to unite this country. It's just not going to happen. Any politician who claims they can is lying. I think the country as a whole can rally around events like after 9/11 or a particular athlete or team in the Olympics but that's it.

And when did calling the President a Nazi or Hitler become racist? Every President has been called that at some point but now because Obama is President it's racist? WTF is that?

I'll go you one better...If, no when Obama loses the election in November, how will that be racist, because you just know that is coming.
 
America is not a socialist country.....yet.

Are you saying we are not a society? I am curious because you quote my post, where no mention whatsoever was made of socialism.

By the way, what mechanism supports public education, paved roads, police and firefighters, armed services, government agencies, Social Security, etc? Would you call it capitalism?
 
Are you saying we are not a society? I am curious because you quote my post, where no mention whatsoever was made of socialism.

Was I wrong to make the leap that you were/are headed down the road of Elizabeth Warren?

By the way, what mechanism supports public education, paved roads, police and firefighters, armed services, government agencies, Social Security, etc? Would you call it capitalism?

Taxes. Which BTW, the wealthy pay the lion share of in this country already.
 
Was I wrong to make the leap that you were/are headed down the road of Elizabeth Warren?



Taxes. Which BTW, the wealthy pay the lion share of in this country already.

Do they? Perhaps you could publish some proof, since you seem so sure of this.
 
When did this occur? Because I'll tell you what I have seen. Either agree with what is his agenda or get told that elections have consequences. That to me is not reaching out. Or, coming to a budget agreement with the opposing party speaker of the house, only to come back the next morning and poison the deal. That is not reaching out.


During the runup to voting for the ACA, Obama REPEATEDLY asked the congressional Republicans to sit down and come up with some compromises to help move the bill along...Republicans refused and/or ignored any attempt at compromise every single time.


You want to talk about voting against things? How many of the dozens of budgets passed in the house, have been taken up in the Senate?


That's nice and all but I believe I asked how many times did Republicans vote in lockstep to oppose whatever Obama proposed?


Talk about 'oh please!' You hit on the only three instances of these things, and if I am not mistaken at least two, if not all three were liberal infiltrators doing these things for a photo op, and dissemination campaign. And you bought it.


Ah yes...denial is an ugly thing, and your outright denial of what everyone saw is truly hilarious.

"Infiltrators"...oh please!


Sorry, but I don't see the racism directed at Obama in those quotes...What I do see is yet another Obama supporter that get his feelings hurt when he gets back what he may have dished out...Maybe you can point out the racism?


Whatever....btw...never claimed the comments in my sig line were "racist", merely vulgar proof of how ready conservatives are to "denigrate others because they disagree with the ideology you hold"...isn't that how you put it?
 
So, 'critical thought' = full throated support, and recruitment to said ideology?

:0) Why would you expect a full-throated response on socialism to conditioned people?

You haven't even spoken to the little I gave you.

Second question on free education, and HC. The short answer is no.

Exactly the response I expected. Healthy babies and educated people can be a problem .. to a capitalist. :0)

Now I have a question for you, on Health care for example, or any "social justice" scheme you have in mind. What is the nature of debt from Person A (the earner), to Person B (the recipient)?

Debt?

Social justice .. debt?

Elaborate on what you mean.
 
Do they? Perhaps you could publish some proof, since you seem so sure of this.

Now Rune, haven't we seen this enough by now to know that it is a simple fact?

*sigh*

From a numbers perspective, the top wage earners are paying more, as a share of taxes collected, than the rest of the country. The top 5 percent of taxpayers paid more in federal income taxes in 2008, the most recent tax year for which full data is available, than the remaining 95 percent put together. And while the same 5 percent did earn a lion's share of the wealth (31.7 percent of the nation's adjusted gross income), they still paid proportionately more (58.7 percent of federal individual income taxes) in terms of dollars. In fact, taxpayers making between $200,000 and $109,735,999 pay more—by percentage of adjusted gross income—than every other tax bracket. And the "barely" millionaires (those making between $1 million and $10 million) pay the most—nearly three times the marginal tax rate of the middle class (roughly those making between $50,000 and $100,000).

http://www.usnews.com/debate-club/d...r-deductions-loopholes-and-exemptions-are-not

The top-earning 5 percent of taxpayers (AGI equal to or greater than $154,643), however, still paid far more than the bottom 95 percent. The top 5 percent earned 31.7 percent of the nation's adjusted gross income, but paid approximately 58.7 percent of federal individual income taxes.

http://taxfoundation.org/article/summary-latest-federal-individual-income-tax-data-0
 
:0) Why would you expect a full-throated response on socialism to conditioned people?

I thought we were discussing honestly?

You haven't even spoken to the little I gave you.

What exactly is it you think I have failed to answer?

Exactly the response I expected. Healthy babies and educated people can be a problem .. to a capitalist. :0)

Anything of true value is never free.

Debt?

Social justice .. debt?

Elaborate on what you mean.

I am trying to keep it simple, the best way to not get sidetracked into the weeds. However, allow me to offer an example.

Let's say I (Person A) earn a living and am a net payer of taxes. And then you have a welfare recipient (Person B) who doesn't work, or pay taxes. Person B is a drug addict that contracts HIV, requiring expensive drugs for the rest of their lives, and is on 100% medicaid to cover that, at the expense of the tax payer. Now explain to me, I don't know this person, I didn't contribute to their habbits, nor did I have any control over what they put in their body. So why am I indebted to them for their health care, and poor choices?
 
Well, the other forums I participated in, half of these people would have been banned already..But I understand that some forums may be a little more lax when it comes to blatant personal attack.

Yeah...tell us about those personal attacks!


simple addled brain
Not because like most people like you on the internet, are trolls and bullies

dumbass

jackass





anal retentive


grow the fuck up will ya?



Who give a fuck what your feelings are.

hard left socialists like yourself

troll as you

trollish behavior

bold faced lie.

immature, insulting hacks

dumb assery

sock puppet

you and Rune must have each others DNA in your asses.

run of the mill dumb asses

childish dismissals and diversion

open wide hack.

neutered puppy
 
I thought we were discussing honestly?

I always discuss honestly .. but also intelligently knowing the capitalist culture that I live in.

What exactly is it you think I have failed to answer?

I expected more on qhat you think socialism is .. which is why I defined it. It's people first.

I expected more on healthcare and education .. both of which are no small problem.

Anything of true value is never free.

Spoken like a capitalist.

Should we charge for air?

Do you not see the benefit of an educated and health population?

I am trying to keep it simple, the best way to not get sidetracked into the weeds. However, allow me to offer an example.

Let's say I (Person A) earn a living and am a net payer of taxes. And then you have a welfare recipient (Person B) who doesn't work, or pay taxes. Person B is a drug addict that contracts HIV, requiring expensive drugs for the rest of their lives, and is on 100% medicaid to cover that, at the expense of the tax payer. Now explain to me, I don't know this person, I didn't contribute to their habbits, nor did I have any control over what they put in their body. So why am I indebted to them for their health care, and poor choices?

Perhaps you don't realize that you pay for them whther you like it or not. Emergency room care is not free or cheap.

Personally, I don't measure by the number of addicts. I measure by the improved health of the people. A concept that is as foreign to a capitalist as patriotism.

If my neighbor is healthy and educated .. the whole country benefits.
 
Back
Top