We need to replace every scum sucking pig that voted against this bill.

  • Thread starter Thread starter WinterBorn
  • Start date Start date
That's hilarious.

That's even more hilarious. Republicans engaging in bi-partisan cooperation. Good one.

And that's even more hilariouser. The bill was paid for through closing a tax loophole on US subsidiaries of foreign corporations.

Yeah nigey its so funny that you can't simply ackowledge that your false accusation was wrong.

Funny that the bill didn't get passed in spite of the majority dems held...hummm-dinger.

The new tax, the democrats typical approach, would have impacted companies that employ American's...meaning likely lay offs. Why not discuss the TARP funds? Because as I said the dems want the bill to fail, were looking for an election startegy, and did not want the public hearing about all those unspent funds again...
 
At least you are willing to admit that the Republicon party cares more about power and profits than it does about the welfare of this country.

Oh yes, you are so right! Us Republicans ONLY care about power and profit, we couldn't care less about helping poor sick heroes or fuzzy kittens, we enjoy watching them suffer too much! That's why all of these millions of people are going to Tea Party rallies and stuff, we just can't stand all of this wonderful benevolent work the Democrats are doing for those in need! We're all just sick greedy capitalist pigs who don't deserve the money we have because we stole it from the poor, and plan to steal even more. We're going to kick poor people out of their homes, out into the streets to die with the heroes of 9/11 and the fuzzy kittens. Then we're going to steal the fillings out of their teeth... not the fuzzy kittens... we plan to 'deregulate' the Korean Restaurant regulations for those... but yeah, you got us pegged man! Good luck trying to stop us...Bwahahahahahahahaha!
 
Yeah nigey its so funny that you can't simply ackowledge that your false accusation was wrong.

I acknowledged that I was mistaken

Funny that the bill didn't get passed in spite of the majority dems held...hummm-dinger.

I don't find that funny at all. I find your mention of Republicans engaging in bi-partisan cooperation hilarious.

The new tax, the democrats typical approach, would have impacted companies that employ American's...meaning likely lay offs. Why not discuss the TARP funds? Because as I said the dems want the bill to fail, were looking for an election startegy, and did not want the public hearing about all those unspent funds again...

Likely layoffs? Why would layoffs be likely? I thought corporate taxes are merely passed on to consumers. If so, there would be no layoffs at all. And the measure simply leveled the playing field for business operating in the United States. Why should U.S. tax laws work to the advantage of subsidiaries of foreign corporations at the expense of American corporations? That makes no sense.

The bottom line is that the Republicans simply wanted to delay, delay, delay and were never going to vote in favor of the bill if not for one reason (taxes!) then another (entitlement!).
 
Then it would be the dems saying no? The point is that dems knew by requiring a 2/3 majority on a 7 1/2 billion dollar bill in order to avoid discussion and amendment, the bill would fail. They were also accutely aware of the pending legal settelment.

The bill itself, like all of these bills, is full of amiguous language, cretates volumes of red tape designed to waste money and comes at a time where economic strain demands fiscal intelligence...it deserved an appearance on the floor.

how can they avoid discussion of the bill

source for paragraph 2 - also, during bad economic times, deficit spending paid to individuals is a good idea
 
I acknowledged that I was mistaken

I don't find that funny at all. I find your mention of Republicans engaging in bi-partisan cooperation hilarious.

Likely layoffs? Why would layoffs be likely? I thought corporate taxes are merely passed on to consumers. If so, there would be no layoffs at all. And the measure simply leveled the playing field for business operating in the United States. Why should U.S. tax laws work to the advantage of subsidiaries of foreign corporations at the expense of American corporations? That makes no sense.

The bottom line is that the Republicans simply wanted to delay, delay, delay and were never going to vote in favor of the bill if not for one reason (taxes!) then another (entitlement!).

Glad to hear you admit you were wrong :)

Bi partisan cooperation was made impossible by dems not republicans.

You are correct in that it is one way or the other; either lay offs or increased costs to consumers....either way a bad plan. How about use money that's already available???
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Boiled down, this doesn't change the FACT that the Party of No will not budge unless it gets it's way. Rep. Weiner called out Sen. King for the bullshit artist that he is....as this was discussed earlier:

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sho...22&postcount=1

12 republicans crossed the aisle for and 4 dems crossed the aisle against.

The dems set up the bill to fail on purpose dork.

"If Democrats brought it to the floor as a regular bill, it would pass with majority support, King said."

I'm amazed at how you continually take your personal supposition and conjecture as fact when it contradicts the historical record. King is full of shit because he's AVOIDING Weiner's point......you can't be for a bill and then bitch and moan because the Dems make it so the very bill you are allegedly for can't be crippled, watered down, prevented or delayed by partisan politics.

Weiner called it right...and all King can do is the neocon shuffle...repeating a mantra over and over.
 
Glad to hear you admit you were wrong :)

Bi partisan cooperation was made impossible by dems not republicans.

You are correct in that it is one way or the other; either lay offs or increased costs to consumers....either way a bad plan. How about use money that's already available???

oh, subsidies of 'foreign' corporations is a good thing now?

a third possibility would be less profit if you believe in a free market economy and demand driven my prices
 
oh, subsidies of 'foreign' corporations is a good thing now?

a third possibility would be less profit if you believe in a free market economy and demand driven my prices

It depends on what the foreign corporation brings to the table. Kia Motors, for instance, provides thousands of jobs in our region. Why wouldn't we do anything we could, to encourage their economic prosperity? Now, I am not a big believer in government "subsidies" but I also know Democrats like to confuse words often, and a "subsidy" could be what most normal people would call a "tax" or a "regulatory fee" imposed on the corporation. By lifting the tax or fee, it becomes, in Demo-speak, a "subsidy" to the corporation.

Your "third possibility" is non-realistic. Corporations don't up and decide they are going to make less profit, it doesn't matter what you might think. Most of them have a formula they go by, and any increase in cost which would effect a predetermined profit, is factored into the consumer prices. and the customer pays the extra amount, it never comes out of profit. This is why conservatives often say, corporations do NOT pay tax! Oh, you can raise their tax rates, as high as you want to go, and they will increase their prices accordingly. If you succeed in pricing them out of the business, they will close operations here, and seek another country to make money in.

So you guys kinda have a dilemma here... you hate capitalism and the greedy 'rich people' corporations... but they are the ones who create the jobs, prosperity, wealth, and yes... tax revenues!
 
oh, subsidies of 'foreign' corporations is a good thing now?

a third possibility would be less profit if you believe in a free market economy and demand driven my prices

Big money don't pay taxes.

They pass them on to you, and me.
 
Back
Top