Welcome to the Gunshine State

The "people they consider the root cause of their problems" are also known as criminals. They already have guns.
Oh SPARE US ALL that tired ass trope! Gunners fight tooth and nail against any reasonable legislation to make it harder for the criminal element to obtain weapons. AND LAST TIME I CHECKED, THERE WAS NEVER A GUN LAW PASSED THAT ENDED THE PLETHORA OF THE LATEST RIFLES (bolt action hunting, semi-auto), SHOTGUNS, (single, double shot, some even pump action) HAND GUNS (semi-auto, revolver, etc.) ... all available to law abiding citizens under various state laws.

Note that the second the GOP let the 1994 AWB sunset, the first weapon that flew off the shelves was the AR-15 and it's various versions. To date, it's been the weapon of choice for a LARGE portion of mass shootings in the last 30 years ... many LEGALLY OBTAINED.

So please, just cut the crap with that insipidly stubborn mantra.
 
Nice try, Arbie. You seem to forget that it was you and the KKK that attacked me first. Sad.

See? Again, you are free to lie about me, Arbie, as you've done from the beginning.

Thanks!
Why must you lie, coward?

You came after me before I ever heard of you., you lying piece shit.
 
Why must you lie, coward?

You came after me before I ever heard of you., you lying piece shit.
Your behavior is on display daily, Arbie. Does anyone really need more evidence that you and your little friends attacked me first? Now you whine about my counterattacks. Ironic, eh? LOL FWIW, you whine that @Guno צְבִי attacked you first too yet everyone can see how vile you are against him.

That has to the weirdest fucking statement you've made in a long time, Arbie. Notice that, in this thread too, you're the first one to derail it by going off topic and attacking me:
And you can't own one...lol
 
Oh SPARE US ALL that tired ass trope! Gunners fight tooth and nail against any reasonable legislation to make it harder for the criminal element to obtain weapons. AND LAST TIME I CHECKED, THERE WAS NEVER A GUN LAW PASSED THAT ENDED THE PLETHORA OF THE LATEST RIFLES (bolt action hunting, semi-auto), SHOTGUNS, (single, double shot, some even pump action) HAND GUNS (semi-auto, revolver, etc.) ... all available to law abiding citizens under various state laws.
Blatant lie (denial). Such laws exist in the SDTC, the SOTNY, and the SOHI.
Note that the second the GOP let the 1994 AWB sunset, the first weapon that flew off the shelves was the AR-15 and it's various versions. To date, it's been the weapon of choice for a LARGE portion of mass shootings in the last 30 years ... many LEGALLY OBTAINED.
Blatant lie (syntheses).
The most popular gun for mass shootings is a .22 pistol. 2nd most popular is a 9mm pistol. Source: FBI and police records.

You want to stop a mass shooter? Shoot back!
So please, just cut the crap with that insipidly stubborn mantra.
Not a mantra. Such laws already exist.
 
Your behavior is on display daily, Arbie. Does anyone really need more evidence that you and your little friends attacked me first? Now you whine about my counterattacks. Ironic, eh? LOL FWIW, you whine that @Guno צְבִי attacked you first too yet everyone can see how vile you are against him.

That has to the weirdest fucking statement you've made in a long time, Arbie. Notice that, in this thread too, you're the first one to derail it by going off topic and attacking me:
You are being paranoid, Sybil. Perhaps because of your hallucinations?
 
Your behavior is on display daily, Arbie. Does anyone really need more evidence that you and your little friends attacked me first? Now you whine about my counterattacks. Ironic, eh? LOL FWIW, you whine that @Guno צְבִי attacked you first too yet everyone can see how vile you are against him.

That has to the weirdest fucking statement you've made in a long time, Arbie. Notice that, in this thread too, you're the first one to derail it by going off topic and attacking me:
iu


iu
 
no, it's not. again, the first part is not a requirement for the second part to be true.
Oh, so I guess when a kid’s father tells his kid he will pay five dollars to clean out the garage the kid can assume that the father is going to give him the money even if he does nothing

Probably not worth asking, but does even cross your mind why the Second Amendment is the only Amendment inwhich the Founders installed a prefatory clause? The First Amendment lists directly Americans’ rights, so why didn’t they do the same for the Second Amendment instead of employing a prefatory with operative clause?
 
Oh, so I guess when a kid’s father tells his kid he will pay five dollars to clean out the garage the kid can assume that the father is going to give him the money even if he does nothing

Probably not worth asking, but does even cross your mind why the Second Amendment is the only Amendment inwhich the Founders installed a prefatory clause? The First Amendment lists directly Americans’ rights, so why didn’t they do the same for the Second Amendment instead of employing a prefatory with operative clause?
false equivalence

irrelevant and already explained

the BofR does not list the rights of Americans. It specifically tells government that it has no power or authority over those rights.
 
Why do you ask, Lesion? The evidence is clear that I make you, Arbie and other MAGA moron losers cry. I'm here only to observe and, sometimes, supply stimuli. :thup:

Are you trying to derail the thread so that you can pay Damo to put me on forced ignore for this account too?
 
false equivalence

irrelevant and already explained

the BofR does not list the rights of Americans. It specifically tells government that it has no power or authority over those
Explain how? Same structure with prefatory and operative clauses

And if it doesn’t list Americans’s personal rights and is directed at the Government why is it titled “Bill of Rights?”
 
Your behavior is on display daily, Arbie. Does anyone really need more evidence that you and your little friends attacked me first? Now you whine about my counterattacks. Ironic, eh? LOL FWIW, you whine that @Guno צְבִי attacked you first too yet everyone can see how vile you are against him.

That has to the weirdest fucking statement you've made in a long time, Arbie. Notice that, in this thread too, you're the first one to derail it by going off topic and attacking me:
I never attack family members, coward. You and the racist bigot attacked mine. That is war, pervert. Fuck you (and that bigoted racist guno) and die, you pathetic lying piece of shit.
 
I never attack family members, coward.

You and the racist bigot attacked mine. That is war, pervert.

Fuck you (and that bigoted racist guno) and die, you pathetic lying piece of shit.
Me neither, son. What's your point?

You're free to lie about me, Arbie. You do it to others so why not me too?

Your hatred is one of your many problems, Arbie. It will eat you up.
 
Me neither, son. What's your point?

You're free to lie about me, Arbie. You do it to others so why not me too?

Your hatred is one of your many problems, Arbie. It will eat you up.
Nah. The bible says there's a time to hate. I'm following a doctrine of my faith. It says about killing too. I also oppose it.
Apparently you agree. Shooting Trump supporters should be a national pastime, right? A bit irrational, but...

You know I'm not lying, coward.
You should get a hobby.
Unless you think being a perverted
asshole on the internet all day a hobby.
Live your dream.
You cannot legally own a firearm.
 
Oh, so I guess when a kid’s father tells his kid he will pay five dollars to clean out the garage the kid can assume that the father is going to give him the money even if he does nothing
Random pivot. No apparent coherency.
Probably not worth asking, but does even cross your mind why the Second Amendment is the only Amendment inwhich the Founders installed a prefatory clause?
No prefatory clause.
The First Amendment lists directly Americans’ rights,
No rights come from a piece of paper.
so why didn’t they do the same for the Second Amendment instead of employing a prefatory with operative clause?
No prefatory clause.
 
Back
Top