We're at 11,000 Witnesses of Vote Fraud and Counting

No one said it was.

Then when I posted the story about the election decision handed down by the PA Supreme Court why did you reply with "The Pennsylvania lawsuit is not filed in Pennsylvania court, dumbass. Fake News."

non sequitur

Obviously a PA Supreme Court decision was filed in a PA court. It was not fake news since I posted the decision which makes you the dumbass.
 
Yes you did, liar. You are STILL trying to equivocate the two.

Nope, show me the post. You make up stuff.

Here is my original post and your reply. Nowhere does it say there was no federal lawsuit:

Originally Posted by Flash

One of the rare legal victories President Trump's campaign picked up in its election challenge was taken away, dealing another blow to the increasingly long-shot effort.

Pennsylvania's Supreme Court on Tuesday reversed a court order that required Philadelphia election officials to let observers within six feet of vote counters after the Trump campaign alleged observers were being kept too far away at 15 to 18 feet. The state's high court, in a 5-2 decision (two of the justices preferred to rule it as moot), said Pennsylvania law gives Philadelphia officials a lot of leeway to decide the rules for observers.

Plus, even the two conservative justices who dissented acknowledged that the Trump campaign's argument that legitimate votes should be invalidated because of improper observation practices was "misguided," The Guardian reports.


Into the Night replied: The Pennsylvania lawsuit is not filed in Pennsylvania court, dumbass. Fake News.
 
Then when I posted the story about the election decision handed down by the PA Supreme Court why did you reply with "The Pennsylvania lawsuit is not filed in Pennsylvania court, dumbass. Fake News."

non sequitur

Obviously a PA Supreme Court decision was filed in a PA court. It was not fake news since I posted the decision which makes you the dumbass.

Semantics fallacy. Fallacy fallacy. Contextomy fallacy. Pivot fallacy. False equivalence fallacy.
 
Nope, show me the post. You make up stuff.
You are just denying what you said again. Anyone that wants to can go look it up.
Here is my original post and your reply. Nowhere does it say there was no federal lawsuit:
...deleted argument by repetition fallacy...pivot fallacy...contextomy fallacy...
Repeating yourself does nothing. Argument by repetition fallacy.
 
You are just denying what you said again. Anyone that wants to can go look it up.

Nobody can look it up, including you, because I never claimed there was no federal lawsuit. Your reading comprehension needs work (plus your veracity).

Because I talked about the PA Supreme Court ruling does not mean there cannot also be federal suits. We call that the dual court system.
 
We're at 11,000 witnesses of Vote Fraud ... and counting.

11,000 witnesses available, and ZERO have been presented in court... There are only two explanations:
1) There really are not 11,000 witnesses.
2) trump is being blackmailed for running an international pedophile ring.
 
Inversion fallacy.

They were.

No, they weren't.

Fake News. False authority fallacy.

Yes there is. Fake News.

No, he didn't. Fake News.

No, they weren't Fake News.

Didn't happen. Fake News.

False authority fallacy. Fake News source. This article is fiction.

I backed my claims up with corroboration.

Now all you've got to do is prove your allegations.

Until you do, that's all they are...ALLEGATIONS.
 
It's over, and by some accounts, Trump knows it's over.

Every day we hear a claim like the OP's. Yesterday, it was 2.7 million votes that went for Biden because of a software glitch.

Tomorrow, it will be something else.

I don't think Trump will concede in the next few days. But when the GA recount finishes on Weds. and doesn't show anything but a minor deviance, he should call Biden and congratulate him.

Trump has already admitted to a white house aid that he knows he lost he just wants to try and punish the democrats.
 
Back
Top