What does Bush's 2004 election say about America?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
cawacko
Well-known member
With all due respect that's real original.
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me twice, shame on me.
Fool me twice, shame on me.
A President Hillary Clinton might not be great, but it would be 1000 times better than a president Bush.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
That's exactly what is says
America deserved George Bush
Lao Tse
Verified User
What will you do when Hillary The Great Hope maintains the same imperialist policy?
Lao Tse
Verified User
Then put up an argument of an actual competing worlview. Republican lite won't cut it.
Say "I told you so," as I've been doing for several elections now...
So lets do it... how do we start!
All of the current crop of canidates thus far.
Says who?
Because YOU think so?
Her talk on Iraq & Iran might as well be Bush. She'll be a hawk, toppy; and there is NO evidence that she is either going to hire Bob Rubin again or continue the policies of her husband's admin.
You are an extremely deluded person about her.
Epicurus
Reasonable
You would prefer Hillary Clinton over every declared Republican candidate???
What does Bush's 2004 election say about America?
That we make mistakes, and elect bad leaders.
I'm not pretending america is unique in this. Some would have us believe that america is fundamentally flawed, in voting for rightwing nut jobs.
Every country has its rightwing nut job constituency. Its only the fact that other developed democracies have parliamentary systems, and near universal voter turnout, that the wingnuts are marginalized.
Lets not pretend the Europeans are light years ahead of us. You could look at any national french election from the last decade, and you will find that 20% of the population votes for hard-rightwing nationalist, fascist, and hard left communist parties. That dude (La Penn?), who is practically a fasicst, came in second place (or something) back in 2004(?). La Penn would make Sam Brownback look like a bleeding heart liberal.
The fact that France has maybe 80% voter turnout, and a parliamentary coaltion system is what keeps these nutjobs in the shadows.
If we ever had 80 to 90% voter turnout, this country would have a permanent progressive majority.
That we make mistakes, and elect bad leaders.
I'm not pretending america is unique in this. Some would have us believe that america is fundamentally flawed, in voting for rightwing nut jobs.
Every country has its rightwing nut job constituency. Its only the fact that other developed democracies have parliamentary systems, and near universal voter turnout, that the wingnuts are marginalized.
Lets not pretend the Europeans are light years ahead of us. You could look at any national french election from the last decade, and you will find that 20% of the population votes for hard-rightwing nationalist, fascist, and hard left communist parties. That dude (La Penn?), who is practically a fasicst, came in second place (or something) back in 2004(?). La Penn would make Sam Brownback look like a bleeding heart liberal.
The fact that France has maybe 80% voter turnout, and a parliamentary coaltion system is what keeps these nutjobs in the shadows.
If we ever had 80 to 90% voter turnout, this country would have a permanent progressive majority.
AnglScarlett
New member
Hopefully sans the flavored cigars, butt, then again, maybe not? Folks, does anyone doubt that should The Hillary be elected, this fool stopspin would run to washington with his own monica-approved kneepads, and a box of Fidel Castros, I do not?