What happened to States Rights?

Teflon Don said:
what does one have to do with the other? deflection on your part?

stop acting as if you are some states rights warrior all of a sudden. You aren't

Just another typical Jarod clickbait thread
Click to expand...
I really enjoy pointing out the hypocrisy of those who support everything Nevele the Felon does.
 
Jarod said:
Quote? If he did, and he may have, he was a shrude politian and not some ideological hero. His opinion is not particularly relevant.
Click to expand...
Letter to Horace Greeley. It's pretty famous. Yes, the South seceded over the issue of slavery but Lincoln invaded the south to preserve the Union.


I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that.
 
FastLane said:
The state wants to punish poor people. Rich people aren't hurt by a $9 fee to get into NYC but waitresses and doormen and barbers sure are. Trump is for the working man and woman.
Click to expand...
Then they should not vote for the Governor who did this. It is a state issue.

I do not believe the claim, because even before "congestion pricing" there were MUCH cheaper (and faster) ways to get in and out of the City than driving.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Letter to Horace Greeley. It's pretty famous. Yes, the South seceded over the issue of slavery but Lincoln invaded the south to preserve the Union.


I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that.
Click to expand...
So he did not say it was "not about slavery"! He said it was secondary to saving the Union. Makes sense to me.
 
Jarod said:
Then they should not vote for the Governor who did this. It is a state issue.

I do not believe the claim, because even before "congestion pricing" there were MUCH cheaper (and faster) ways to get in and out of the City than driving.
Click to expand...
Not a lawyer, but it does seem to be a state issue.
 
Jarod said:
So he did not say it was "not about slavery"! He said it was secondary to saving the Union. Makes sense to me.
Click to expand...
Ummm....read the letter. Note that the emancipation declaration only freed slaves in the South, not the North.

"If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it"
 
Jarod said:
Remember when Trumppers used to believe in States Rights?
Click to expand...
Trump trolls and you take the bait and run.
It is extremely unlikely that Trump can override a city setting its tax rates.

Why don't you shut your piehole until this gets sorted out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top