What if everyone voted? The case for 100 percent democracy.

American wasn't founded on the principle of causing poverty.

A lot of Democrats also work indirectly for the top 5 percent. A political party doesn't work for anyone but it's members.

So you don't want to pay for the products and services you use...gotit. Guess what? You can't get away from that, dude.

You are describing Democrats.

principle of causing poverty. What the fuck does that mean? Are you just stringing words together?
Somebody keeps cutting taxes on the wealthy and corporations. They also slash regulations as corporations want. Can you guess what party that is? They are red.
You are amazing wrong and frightenly ill-informed.
 
principle of causing poverty. What the fuck does that mean? Are you just stringing words together?
YOU brought up the concept, dude. Ask yourself.
Somebody keeps cutting taxes on the wealthy and corporations.
Good. They are too high.
They also slash regulations as corporations want.
Good. They are too onerous.
Can you guess what party that is? They are red.
Good for them! I'm glad you at least give credit where it's due here!
You are amazing wrong and frightenly ill-informed.
You are describing yourself.
 
Universal voting takes seriously the Declaration of Independence’s insistence that government is legitimate only when it is based on the “consent of the governed.” The Founders did not say “some of the governed” (even 66.8 percent). Including everyone in our system of government would live up to the promise made at the birth of our republic. Universal voting would tear down barriers and elevate our civic obligations.

More than two dozen democratic countries have versions of compulsory participation. One of the most successful models is Australia’s. The United States adopted the secret ballot after Australia tried it first. We should do the same with universal voting.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...g-would-end-legal-battles-over-ballot-access/

Fuck democracy. The last thing I want is mob rule.
 
Playing opposites again. Are you incapable of thought ?

What opposites?

Trump reduced taxes. That is good.
Trump reduced regulations strangling business. That is good.

You even freely admit that Trump did these things...yet you seem to think lower taxes and fewer regulations is a problem.

So....what is your problem?
 
It is why we have a federal republic.

There is no provision for excuses in our federal doctrine.

No more. The United States has fallen. The federal government has been converted into an oligarchy by the Democrats after they conducted their silent coup via election fraud and faulting the election. The Democrats do not recognize the Constitution of the United States no any State constitution.

It is now up to the States, now independent, to see whether a constitution can be re-established declaring and defining a federal government (so far the intent seems be to use the same Constitution of the United States).

Whether this can happen without a civil war remains unknown.
 
No more. The United States has fallen. The federal government has been converted into an oligarchy by the Democrats after they conducted their silent coup via election fraud and faulting the election. The Democrats do not recognize the Constitution of the United States no any State constitution.

It is now up to the States, now independent, to see whether a constitution can be re-established declaring and defining a federal government (so far the intent seems be to use the same Constitution of the United States).

Whether this can happen without a civil war remains unknown.

Stop being so stupid. The oligopoly is a product of the Republicunt party who works for the wealthy and corporations. The government is not an oligarchy, it is what our economy is being turned into by the reds.
 
What opposites?

Trump reduced taxes. That is good.
Trump reduced regulations strangling business. That is good.

You even freely admit that Trump did these things...yet you seem to think lower taxes and fewer regulations is a problem.

So....what is your problem?

Someone posts and you do a thread saying the opposite step by step without adding a scintilla of information or discussion. That is anathema to the entire concept of a debate board and extremely inadequate.
They are not lower taxes on the mass of people. He cut them for the wealthy and corporations who are rolling in profits and extreme executive compensation. The wealth gap is obscene and worse than the gilded age and you have no idea of that. Many of the biggest corporations pay little or no taxes. Some get money back. They simply do not pay for the system and the government that supports their lavish life styles. I think that is wrong.
 
No more. The United States has fallen. The federal government has been converted into an oligarchy by the Democrats after they conducted their silent coup via election fraud and faulting the election. The Democrats do not recognize the Constitution of the United States no any State constitution.

It is now up to the States, now independent, to see whether a constitution can be re-established declaring and defining a federal government (so far the intent seems be to use the same Constitution of the United States).

Whether this can happen without a civil war remains unknown.
Right-wing fantasy is only wonderful to right-wingers.
 
Someone posts and you do a thread saying the opposite step by step without adding a scintilla of information or discussion.
That is anathema to the entire concept of a debate board and extremely inadequate.
So you want to deny your own argument again. Meh.
They are not lower taxes on the mass of people.
Trump lowered taxes across the board.
He cut them for the wealthy and corporations who are rolling in profits and extreme executive compensation.
Good.
The wealth gap is obscene
Buzzword fallacy.
and worse than the gilded age
What is?
and you have no idea of that.
Inversion fallacy.
Many of the biggest corporations pay little or no taxes. Some get money back.
No one gets money back. Taxes are taxes. All corporations pay taxes on their profits made in the States.
They simply do not pay for the system and the government that supports their lavish life styles.
They do. They don't depend on government like you do. They are producing products and services that people want to buy.
I think that is wrong.
Because you're a communist. Communism doesn't work. You seem to be proud that you're on welfare.
 
So you want to deny your own argument again. Meh.

Trump lowered taxes across the board.

Good.

Buzzword fallacy.

What is?

Inversion fallacy.

No one gets money back. Taxes are taxes. All corporations pay taxes on their profits made in the States.

They do. They don't depend on government like you do. They are producing products and services that people want to buy.

Because you're a communist. Communism doesn't work. You seem to be proud that you're on welfare.

None of what you typed is true. However , even you have to admit you are making claims that you could not know about to insult me and somehow that will make your atrocious posts seem better.
 
Last edited:
How is the fall of the United States wonderful????!?
How is the prospect of a civil war wonderful????!?

The fantasy is yours. It is YOU denying history. It is YOU that can't keep track of the conversation.
Only well regulated militias of the United States have literal recourse to our Second Amendment.
 
Back
Top