Boris The Animal
It's Just Boris!
What these leftists want is 100% totalitarian rule. What they're going to get is 11 rounds in the heart (with one blank) as they're lined up against a wall.
What if everyone voted? The case for 100 percent democracy.
- Thread starter BidenPresident
- Start date
BidenPresident
Verified User
Thanks for showing what a scumbag you are.
Boris The Animal
It's Just Boris!
You're the scumbag and an enemy of America. Time to line all of you against the wall
BidenPresident
Verified User
bye stupid
Boris The Animal
It's Just Boris!
The only people who are stupid are Communists like you.
Into the Night
Verified User
He didn't ask for forgiveness from you.
I am pretty sure he know exactly what he is doing at least most of the time.
They don't. There are Republicans that own their own small business, work for small businesses, some that are very successful (but not in the top 1 percent), and some that are retired.
Into the Night
Verified User
You can't make the evidence go away because someone didn't take a trip, dude.
Into the Night
Verified User
It was DEMOCRATS that discarded the Constitution of the United States and the constitutions of the various States, dude.
Into the Night
Verified User
Last edited:
Into the Night
Verified User
Trump cut taxes for everybody.
Good.
What corporate and wealthy malfeasance? Bigotry.
Void argument fallacy. Specifics?
What crappy attempts? Void argument fallacy.
There is such thing as a 'wealth gap'. Buzzword fallacy. Jealousy. If you want lots of money, make yourself worth something to somebody.
Hallucinating. It is Antifa and BLM thugs supported by Democrats that are looting and pillaging in cities.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Agreed! So I find it fascinating that the political party that pushes and passes rules and regulations that aid & abet what you say is constantly being supported by the very people who are NOT "rich, connected, and powerful".
Reaganomics has seriously screwed this country further into the ground for the last 30 years at least. Essentially "anti-trust" laws are toothless thanks to GOP controlled legislation. Insane tax breaks for folks that don't need them, outsourcing of jobs .... it ain't working for the working man and the vaunted (working) middle class. Why people vote against their interest is beyond me.
Into the Night
Verified User
Government does not produce anything. It just consumes. The bigger it is, the more it consumes.
Into the Night
Verified User
That's just naive.
Into the Night
Verified User
American wasn't founded on the principle of causing poverty.
A lot of Democrats also work indirectly for the top 5 percent. A political party doesn't work for anyone but it's members.
So you don't want to pay for the products and services you use...gotit. Guess what? You can't get away from that, dude.
You are describing Democrats.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
It isn't "Reaganomics." It can be most clearly seen in Blue states. California, Illinois, Michigan (until recently), New York, etc., all have massive regulations and government intrusion into people's lives. They are all also seeing business and the Middle Class flee them for friendlier locales. That's the insanity at work. More government screws everybody but politicians and the filthy rich.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Bull-fucking-shit! Reaganomics WAS NATIONWIDE FEDERAL REGULATIONS. For your information (take your pick):
https://thedailybanter.com/2017/08/...w-reaganomics-has-destroyed-the-middle-class/
https://consortiumnews.com/2013/10/17/the-abject-failure-of-reaganomics/
https://consortiumnews.com/2011/09/20/the-dark-legacy-of-reaganomics/
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/8/13/1788051/-Reagan-Ruined-America
Why is there a die hard defense of the political party and it's primary policy that screws YOU in the long run? History and valid, documented facts won't let your revisionism stand.
Last edited:
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
I read all your links. They all use a faulty generalization and beg the question. The economic system of the US, as a whole, is far more complex than to attributed to a singular cause for virtually anything that happens.
For example, the cost of federal regulation has grown tremendously:
That regulation comes at a cost. For employers, it could well mean that they reduce the rate at which wages and benefits grow. That means employees lose ground compared to inflation. For the wealthy, they can usually redirect some or most of their wealth to avoid these increases.
This is just one example of how growth of government effects the economy. Each state piles on its own rules with those having the most onerous now seeing business and residents fleeing for lower cost states.
To attribute everything to a single cause is idiocy as those articles did.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
I read all your links. They all use a faulty generalization and beg the question. The economic system of the US, as a whole, is far more complex than to attributed to a singular cause for virtually anything that happens.
For example, the cost of federal regulation has grown tremendously:
That regulation comes at a cost. For employers, it could well mean that they reduce the rate at which wages and benefits grow. That means employees lose ground compared to inflation. For the wealthy, they can usually redirect some or most of their wealth to avoid these increases.
This is just one example of how growth of government effects the economy. Each state piles on its own rules with those having the most onerous now seeing business and residents fleeing for lower cost states.
To attribute everything to a single cause is idiocy as those articles did.
Oh for the love of God! WTF is it with you MAGA minions? You LIE about or try to diminish any information that contradicts your oft repeated mantras and revisionist clap trap. Case in point, your first two sentences are LIES, as every link documents it's premises with valid source material. What's comical is that if one reads the fine print of YOUR source, we see such dubious "documentation" as; "derived from the Budget of the U.S. government and related documents, various fiscal years". In other words, supposition and conjecture.
In my sources, the links are DIRECT to valid documentation. Had you actually read them carefully and comprehensively, you'd know that. And if the reader is in doubt,
here's another example:
it's not a coincidence that the disparity between rich and poor began during the Reagan years. It is a result of the economic policies that Reagan's administration advanced. We have heard about Reagan's record on raising taxes, but what often gets missed is this: the way Reagan cut, then raised taxes shifted a good deal of the tax burden to those who were less well off. He slashed the top income tax brackets, then, when it became obvious that more revenue was needed, it was generated by eliminating some deductions and loopholes, and also by adding or increasing some consumption taxes, most of which disproportionately affected the middle class.
For example, before Reagan, the interest you paid on your credit card balance, car loans, etc, was deductible on your federal income taxes. Reagan took away those deductions, which wasn't a big deal for the rich, who could pay cash for a new car and probably didn't have much if any balance on their credit cards. But the loss of those deductions meant many middle class taxpayers gave back most if not all of the tax cut they had received, and then some.
And more importantly, Reagan raised the most regressive tax that most Americans pay; the Social Security, or FICA tax. That tax is collected from the first dollar of earned income, but it is subject to a cap, meaning that those with incomes above the cap pay it at a lower percentage of their overall income than those who fall below the cap and pay FICA tax on every dollar they make. Add to that the fact that many of the ultra-rich make their living off "unearned" income, dividends and such, which are not subject to FICA tax at all.
FACTS that cannot be denied....but you'll keep parroting the same idiocy to defend reaganomics despite it's historical failure.
, So
Oh stop it. Your silly crap is beyond boring. The Repubs like you vote against their own interests because you do not know the truth, or refuse to believe it. The Repubs are the party of the top 5 percent and you dopes keep them richer and more powerful.
Into the Night
Verified User
Not speculation. History. None of the years on that chart are in the future.