What that crazy moonbat Palin is saying today!

Dixie had to bump this thread several times so he could make the false claim that we were all attacking Sara (sell your children to the highest bidder) Palin.

Yes, it's a false claim that the left attacks Sarah Palin, I don't know why I thought I could get away with such a lie!

I just thought I would point out an example of her 'insane extremist views' we hear so much about. She's clearly unhinged if she thinks that parents should be responsible for raising their kids... what kind of backwoods mouth-breather thinking is that? Right???
 
Yes, it's a false claim that the left attacks Sarah Palin, I don't know why I thought I could get away with such a lie!

I just thought I would point out an example of her 'insane extremist views' we hear so much about. She's clearly unhinged if she thinks that parents should be responsible for raising their kids... what kind of backwoods mouth-breather thinking is that? Right???

WE were all happily ignoring her silly comments, until you posted this thread and kept bumping it.

Where did she say she thinks parents should be responsable for raisning their kids?

Where did anyone say parents should not be responsable for raising their kids?
 
Absolute, undiluted horseshit.

We just had a story on the 5 o'clock news last night about a 6 year old child who left his school grounds and proceeded to walk to his home. He was found walking along the side of the road by a good samaritan on her way home. She took the child to his house and informed the child's parents where he had been picked up.

The good samaritan was HAILED BY THE HPD AND THE BOY'S PARENTS AS A HERO!

So much for your bullshit diversion.

This stuff happens ALL DAY LONG, but it does not sell soap and soap sellers are the only ones reporting stories any more so.... you dont hear about it.
 
Yes, it's a false claim that the left attacks Sarah Palin, I don't know why I thought I could get away with such a lie!

I just thought I would point out an example of her 'insane extremist views' we hear so much about. She's clearly unhinged if she thinks that parents should be responsible for raising their kids... what kind of backwoods mouth-breather thinking is that? Right???

It is different when it comes to her speciall needs child, then she talks about how community is needed!
 
It is a world I still live in, my daughter lives in a cul de sac with lots of young families and they all look out for one another. I also lived and raised my children in a neighborhood where we looked out for one another and we are still friends and have get togethers where there are multiple generations!

I guess it is a case of like attracting, like.

It is a shame your neighborhood is not like ours!

EXACTLY!

My daughter plays outside with our next door neighbor and the kids from across the street all the time and usually it's either myself and the wife, our neighbors or the family across the street taking turns watching ALL the kids. I am completely comfortable letting my daughter play out front with the other kids because I know I can trust the other parents...and why?

BECAUSE WE ARE A COMMUNITY.
 
It is a world I still live in, my daughter lives in a cul de sac with lots of young families and they all look out for one another. I also lived and raised my children in a neighborhood where we looked out for one another and we are still friends and have get togethers where there are multiple generations!

I guess it is a case of like attracting, like.

It is a shame your neighborhood is not like ours!

Who said it's not? I live about a mile from where I was raised, and know just about everyone around here. I live in a rural area, and people tend to mind their own business, so we don't have 'get togethers' as much, but when a home burns or disaster happens, the neighbors all pitch in to help, and what few 'kids' live out here, only wish that they lived somewhere else. In such an environment, parenting becomes a much easier task, because "going to town" has such a powerful motivational factor for most kids. There is very little need for neighbors to "look out" for other people's kids.

It's great to live in a close-knit community, there is nothing like it. But that is not what this MSNBC moonbat was talking about, and it's not what liberal socialists want to do. That is being spun as the deception, what you are supposed to believe she meant. This is about indoctrination. And they fully intend to go through with this, it's part of the plan.

This isn't paranoia, I wish that it was. I told myself that for years, but I am more convinced than ever now. Thinking and rational people need to be aware, this is not as it seems, this is not about returning to Beaver Cleaver days, where neighbors looked out for each other, we don't live in those times anymore. I bet the vast majority of posters here, can't name 6 of their neighbors. I bet there are some who don't know any! When I lived in the apartments in Montgomery, I didn't know anyone, and if I met someone, they moved a month later or something, it's just the way of life in apartments. You may know the people around you, if you make the effort, but people are not nearly as 'social' as they once were, especially with the advent of social networking. So to pretend this is really about some longing for days gone by, is laughable to me. Liberals KILLED those days and buried them, under a heap of liberal 'progressive' policies and laws, which make it a very risky business sticking your nose in the affairs of others.
 
WE were all happily ignoring her silly comments, until you posted this thread and kept bumping it.

Where did she say she thinks parents should be responsable for raisning their kids?

Where did anyone say parents should not be responsable for raising their kids?

You know, when you reply, it also bumps the thread.

"Unflippinbelievable!" ...that's where she said she thinks parents should be responsible for raising their kids.

"They are not really YOUR kids, they are OUR kids" ....that's when the MSNBC moonbat said parents should not be responsible.

Any more questions, J-tard?
 
Who said it's not? I live about a mile from where I was raised, and know just about everyone around here. I live in a rural area, and people tend to mind their own business, so we don't have 'get togethers' as much, but when a home burns or disaster happens, the neighbors all pitch in to help, and what few 'kids' live out here, only wish that they lived somewhere else. In such an environment, parenting becomes a much easier task, because "going to town" has such a powerful motivational factor for most kids. There is very little need for neighbors to "look out" for other people's kids.

It's great to live in a close-knit community, there is nothing like it. But that is not what this MSNBC moonbat was talking about, and it's not what liberal socialists want to do. That is being spun as the deception, what you are supposed to believe she meant. This is about indoctrination. And they fully intend to go through with this, it's part of the plan.

This isn't paranoia, I wish that it was. I told myself that for years, but I am more convinced than ever now. Thinking and rational people need to be aware, this is not as it seems, this is not about returning to Beaver Cleaver days, where neighbors looked out for each other, we don't live in those times anymore. I bet the vast majority of posters here, can't name 6 of their neighbors. I bet there are some who don't know any! When I lived in the apartments in Montgomery, I didn't know anyone, and if I met someone, they moved a month later or something, it's just the way of life in apartments. You may know the people around you, if you make the effort, but people are not nearly as 'social' as they once were, especially with the advent of social networking. So to pretend this is really about some longing for days gone by, is laughable to me. Liberals KILLED those days and buried them, under a heap of liberal 'progressive' policies and laws, which make it a very risky business sticking your nose in the affairs of others.


Ah yes, I forgot.

Dixie was born with special telepathic powers that allow him to read and interpret the innermost thoughts of others.

How else could he presume to lecture everyone on "what this MSNBC moonbat was talking about"?
 
Who said it's not? I live about a mile from where I was raised, and know just about everyone around here. I live in a rural area, and people tend to mind their own business, so we don't have 'get togethers' as much, but when a home burns or disaster happens, the neighbors all pitch in to help, and what few 'kids' live out here, only wish that they lived somewhere else. In such an environment, parenting becomes a much easier task, because "going to town" has such a powerful motivational factor for most kids. There is very little need for neighbors to "look out" for other people's kids.

It's great to live in a close-knit community, there is nothing like it. But that is not what this MSNBC moonbat was talking about, and it's not what liberal socialists want to do. That is being spun as the deception, what you are supposed to believe she meant. This is about indoctrination. And they fully intend to go through with this, it's part of the plan.

This isn't paranoia, I wish that it was. I told myself that for years, but I am more convinced than ever now. Thinking and rational people need to be aware, this is not as it seems, this is not about returning to Beaver Cleaver days, where neighbors looked out for each other, we don't live in those times anymore. I bet the vast majority of posters here, can't name 6 of their neighbors. I bet there are some who don't know any! When I lived in the apartments in Montgomery, I didn't know anyone, and if I met someone, they moved a month later or something, it's just the way of life in apartments. You may know the people around you, if you make the effort, but people are not nearly as 'social' as they once were, especially with the advent of social networking. So to pretend this is really about some longing for days gone by, is laughable to me. Liberals KILLED those days and buried them, under a heap of liberal 'progressive' policies and laws, which make it a very risky business sticking your nose in the affairs of others.

Sounds like a personal problem to me, I have never had problems meeting my neighbors.
 
DO YOU KNOW WHY THESE IMMIGRANTS CAME TO THIS COUNTRY? THE IRISH? THE DUTCH? THE GERMANS? THE ITALIANS? THE JAPANESE? THE CHINESE? THE VIETNAMESE? THE MEXICANS? HOW ABOUT THE FUCKING INDIANS???
Because America is the society where one can rise up from dirt poor to president if they are industrious enough.

FOR A BETTER LIFE FOR THEIR CHILDREN.
Only partially true, In fact, do everyone here a favor and search "Why immigrants come to [country]". Then come back here with some more humility.

http://www.socialstudieshelp.com/lesson_54_notes.htm
Immigrants came to America for many reasons. Beginning in the 1600's and 1700's America was seen as the land of opportunity. The Pilgrims came for the opportunity to have religious freedom. The Quakers and French Huguenots did as well. Economic opportunity was also a goal of many early immigrants. Whether it was the search for gold, the chance to own land and a farm or the chance to start a new life... even as an indentured servant; America was the "new world" and full of opportunities.


PBS doesn't care that you are an ignorant puffball, they want to help you anyhow.
http://www.pbs.org/destinationamerica/usim_wy.html


OF COURSE, MANY OF THEM WEREN'T ABLE TO ASSIMILATE INTO THE NEW CULTURE THEY'D LEFT EVERYTHING AND EVERYONE THEY LOVED IN THEIR HOMELAND FOR.

No Howey, don't want to. They actively chose not to. Are you so strung out on the liberal value plan you don't know that half the world hates us and our culture, ideals?


http://www.child-encyclopedia.com/pages/PDF/Bornstein-BohrANGxp1.pdf
Research shows that immigrants do not always readily adopt cognitions of the receiving culture, and culturally significant parenting beliefs and norms tend to resist change.12,13 For example, Chinese Canadian transnational parents opt to allow grandparents to care for their infants, based on expectations of their culture of origin, despite emotional hardship and disapproval within the receiving culture.14 Generally, parenting practices appear to migrate more readily than cognitions. For example, Japanese immigrant mothers’ cognitions remain close to the cognitions of mothers in Japan, or are intermediate between those of Japanese and European American mothers, whereas their practices change to resemble those of European American mothers more closely than those of Japanese.15,16,17,18 In addition, different immigrant groups retain and adopt culture-specific cognitions and practices differently.19 Immigrant mothers from South America share more cognitions and practices with U.S. American mothers in their culture of destination than mothers in their cultures of origin.15,16


BUT THEIR CHILDREN DID. AND DO.

Not always.
http://news.medill.northwestern.edu/chicago/news.aspx?id=203969


HERE'S A WEBPAGE FROM A FUCKING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL THAT LISTS FAMOUS IMMIGRANTS, NOT JUST THEIR CHILDREN! WHY AREN'T YOU LEARNING THIS SHIT INSTEAD OF INFESTING A FUCKING WEBBOARD ALL DAY, YOU GODDAMN TARD![/B][/SIZE]

Poor Howey. Got all twisted up in his stupid. Forgot to actually add sustainence to his crap sandwich.
 
Since I guess Whiz Kid's going to have to depend on us for his education...

http://www.latina.com/entertainment/buzz/52-latino-celebs-whose-parents-are-immigrants

Look. These kids are actually learning something and not trolling a forum!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/24/immigrants-science_n_866321.html

Repugnant, you call this facts? I call it gossip, mostly.


Here, a real research article
http://ncache.appstate.edu/sites/nc...cademic Performance of Immigrant Students.pdf


Some will wonder whether these results merely reflect the overall poor performance
of New York City public school children. Perhaps the foreign-born
advantage is not hard-won at all but, rather, the result of low performance
by the native-born students. So how well do New York City students perform
compared to other U.S. students? Recent NAEP results from five large urban
districts (Lutkus et al. 2003) reveal that New York City (and Houston) scored
45
IS THERE A NATIVITY GAP?
higher in fourth-grade reading than the three other urban districts, comparable
to all “central cities,” although lower than the national average.23 Thus,
while urban students do not perform as well as students in suburban districts,
New York City students do not do poorly compared to other urban districts.
Perhaps our immigrants are part of the reason.
In sum, our results suggest that nativity itself explains little of the disparities
in performance across students. Instead, much of the disparity is explained
by the same set of variables that explain differences in performance of nativeborn
students—English language proficiency, prior performance, gender, and
the characteristics of their schooling. Thismeans that it may be best to channel
new resources toward “old” persistent problems of socioeconomic and racial
disparities in performance, which do continue to disadvantage poor, black,
and Hispanic students, whether immigrant or native-born.

Children of immigrants perform at varying levels, some much, much lower and some quite a bit higher, your gossip doesn't further your agrument.
 
Last edited:
It is truly disappointing that they focus on Sarah Palin when there are so many young and upcoming conservative women who are so bright and reasonable but because they are, they don't get the spotlight. These women, to me, are the future of the party.
 
I can't win with you, you want more proof, you go find an article. Was a pain to fidn that. I've made my point.

Ahh, here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Places_in_the_United_States_with_notable_demographic_characteristics


Actually you CAN win with me as I find your comments, despite the fact I don't agree with them, to at least be an ATTEMPT at discourse.

My point was that, although your links do show the cities in the USA where ethnic minorities are the MAJORITY, it in no way proves they aren't "Americans".
 
You know, when you reply, it also bumps the thread.

"Unflippinbelievable!" ...that's where she said she thinks parents should be responsible for raising their kids.

"They are not really YOUR kids, they are OUR kids" ....that's when the MSNBC moonbat said parents should not be responsible.

Any more questions, J-tard?

Wow, you are a great translator..... "unflippinbelievable" means, she thinks parents should be responsible for raising their kids.


Thats the beauty of Palin for Conservatives... She makes some vague comment, and they fill in the blank about what they want it to mean. She never has to take a stand on anything.
 
Back
Top