Matt Dillon
Semolina comes from wheat
should government be for profit venture?
As a citizen, I say definitely not!
should government be for profit venture?
So you were a stripper during college?
As a citizen, I say definitely not!
Suuure ya do.
Why is it you don't care about all those less fortunate than you?
what's the inflation rate? gas prices? food prices?We have almost no unemployment and just came off a year with the best GDP growth in almost four decades.
Is that what you're referring to?
too many to list here, but it would also stop paying for alot of unconstitutional agencies and programs as wellWhat are those, specifically?
Yes. And higher positive ROI pays even more. That's the point I'm making. It's a pretty elementary concept in finance -- like if there's an investment available that will get me 0.1% above inflation over the next 20 years, if I lock it up that long, even though that's technically a positive ROI, it's also a garbage investment, since I have lots of options likely to pay a lot better. So, I don't think it's enough to simply require that spending have a positive ROI for it to be optimal. We'd also need to know what the opportunity cost is, in terms of the private-sector spending that would have happened if the government weren't using the money.
Anyway, I think generally we under-invest, by way of government, so I think this is more of a theoretical issue in the US... but it could be a more significant problem in countries that may have too much government spending as a share of GDP (e.g., France or Denmark).
$850 per week isn't that much. We're talking about $21.25/hour, based on a 40-hour week. In my neck of the woods, Administrative Assistants can make that:
https://g.co/kgs/SBKniv
If you had any sense you would have noticed that our friend Mina suggested we coulld borrow money to DECREASE taxes.
Run along and let the grownups talk.
That’s not possible. But I understand the argument apparently you don’t. Sorry about that.
what's the inflation rate? gas prices? food prices?
too many to list here, but it would also stop paying for alot of unconstitutional agencies and programs as well
Higher than normal. As in all economies, there are good features and bad.
Unfortunately, conservatives tend to use "unconstitutional" as a way to refer to any program they don't personally happen to like.
so you were a stripper.
especially the unconstitutional ones....
No. I have no talent for dancing. But in the more productive parts of the country, it's pretty easy to secure an office job making over $20/hour even before making it through college.
I'd rather strip.
but thats me.
Im a hussy, and a user.
About 25 to 30% of GDP. Anything more and you drag down the economy pretty severely.
wouldn't 0% be optimal?
government produces nothing and only takes from those that do produce
if we can find a solution where government no longer needs to take from the productive - how is that not optimal?
As you can see, I do.