You do understand you keep bouncing between the IRS and international banking laws, don't you? If I point out the limits of the IRS, you spring toward offshore banks, if I point out the limits on offshore banks, you go back to the IRS. What are you trying to say here? That if the Democrats win in court to see Trump's financial records all of this will magically be revealed? Sorry, for aforementioned reasons, it won't. It's just Democrats digging up dirt like Trump and Republicans asking to see Obama's "real" birth certificate. It's bullshit.
![Smile :) :)](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png)
For all I know, Trump may be 'legally' laundering money. I brought up the 'worth' of a horse as an example. The 'legal' question is neither here nor there. The 'question' is: Is Trump 'owned' by the Russian Oligarchs (Putin). If Trump is involved in 'laundering' Russian money, turning Rubles into Dollars, then that may effect how he, as President of the US, deals with Russia. Historically, Republicans have been very hostile to the atheist Communists of Russia, ... now, not so much with Trump at the Helm.
Do you think knowing Flynn worked for Turkey should have been made public?
"WASHINGTON — Michael Flynn, who was President Donald Trump's former national security adviser until being fired last month, has registered with the Justice Department as a foreign agent for $530,000 worth of lobbying work before Election Day that may have aided the Turkish government."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/po...his-lobbying-might-have-helped-turkey-n731056
Knowing who a person 'works for' can color their decisions. So, whether it's Flynn or Trump, I'd like to know who the guy is obligated to.