Where are the Republicans going?

cawacko said:
Most one percenters are on the coasts (I happen to be surrounded by them) and they are often politically liberal
Click to expand...

You live in SF. You're surrounded by faggots, left wingers, and illegals. Since you've expressed your support for Pelosi, you're just as Liberal as they are.
 
CFM said:
You live in SF. You're surrounded by faggots, left wingers, and illegals. Since you've expressed your support for Pelosi, you're just as Liberal as they are.
Click to expand...

You jerkoff Conservatives always act like being Liberal is a bad thing!
While supporting a truly evil fascist!
 
Supposn said:
Where are the Republicans going?
Republicans believe themselves to be conservatives, but I suppose they'll adopt any political label that would suit their purposes. They are not more or less patriotic than any other USA citizens.

They do not represent the majority of USA's population, and although they represent the majority of U.S. congressional districts, Republican federally elected office holders are not our nation's majority of voters' choice.

If voters are ranked by wealth, the majority of wealthier voters are Republicans. I've been led to believe the overwhelming majority of corporation share owners and their executives are Republicans. I'm also told that the same for military and law enforcement officers and their lower ranks, but I have less confidence in those reports.
Among other professions where a Republican majority might exist, those majorities are not overwhelming. Within some professions, the majority of practitioners are not Republicans.

Our nation's demographics are detrimental to a political party of policies currently advocated by Republicans. In the not distant and possibly near future, I suppose Republicans will have significantly lesser influence upon USA's policies.

Respectfully, Supposn
Click to expand...

Your ignorance is truly astonishing. How do you remember to breathe?
 
Supposn said:
Where are the Republicans going?
Republicans believe themselves to be conservatives, but I suppose they'll adopt any political label that would suit their purposes. They are not more or less patriotic than any other USA citizens.

They do not represent the majority of USA's population, and although they represent the majority of U.S. congressional districts, Republican federally elected office holders are not our nation's majority of voters' choice.

If voters are ranked by wealth, the majority of wealthier voters are Republicans. I've been led to believe the overwhelming majority of corporation share owners and their executives are Republicans. I'm also told that the same for military and law enforcement officers and their lower ranks, but I have less confidence in those reports.
Among other professions where a Republican majority might exist, those majorities are not overwhelming. Within some professions, the majority of practitioners are not Republicans.

Our nation's demographics are detrimental to a political party of policies currently advocated by Republicans. In the not distant and possibly near future, I suppose Republicans will have significantly lesser influence upon USA's policies.

Respectfully, Supposn
Click to expand...
They are not more patriotic that the average voter. They are more patriotic than Democratic voters.
 
If the universe weren't random and indifferent, Republicans would certainly go to hell.

We should try to send there anyway.
 
cawacko said:
The majority of wealthier voters are Republicans? Then how do you explain LA, SF, Seattle, Chicago, Boston, NY and Washington D.C. and how they vote?
Click to expand...

Let me pick someone , somewhere who goes against your premise and you can pretend it means something about the whole. Only, it does not. Can you guys understand logic? The Republican party has been the party of big business and the wealthy for generations. It has not changed now. Look at Daffy and his administration of millionaires. Look at who donates to the party. This is simply fact.
 
cawacko said:
Most one percenters are on the coasts (I happen to be surrounded by them) and they are often politically liberal
Click to expand...

You're wrong:

https://howmuch.net/articles/average-income-of-top-1-per-cent



Teton, Wyoming - Average Income of Top 1%: $28,163,786

New York, New York - Average Income of Top 1%: $8,143,415

Fairfield, Connecticut - Average Income of Top 1%: $6,061,230

La Salle, Texas - Average Income of Top 1%: $6,021,357

Pitkin, Colorado - Average Income of Top 1%: $5,289,153

McKenzie, North Dakota - Average Income of Top 1%: $4,709,883

Shackelford, Texas - Average Income of Top 1%: $4,585,725

Westchester, New York - Average Income of Top 1%: $4,326,049

Collier, Florida - Average Income of Top 1%: $4,191,055

Union, South Dakota - Average Income of Top 1%: $4,106,670
 
Old Trapper said:
You're wrong:

https://howmuch.net/articles/average-income-of-top-1-per-cent



Teton, Wyoming - Average Income of Top 1%: $28,163,786

New York, New York - Average Income of Top 1%: $8,143,415

Fairfield, Connecticut - Average Income of Top 1%: $6,061,230

La Salle, Texas - Average Income of Top 1%: $6,021,357

Pitkin, Colorado - Average Income of Top 1%: $5,289,153

McKenzie, North Dakota - Average Income of Top 1%: $4,709,883

Shackelford, Texas - Average Income of Top 1%: $4,585,725

Westchester, New York - Average Income of Top 1%: $4,326,049

Collier, Florida - Average Income of Top 1%: $4,191,055

Union, South Dakota - Average Income of Top 1%: $4,106,670
Click to expand...
He's right. So you're suggesting the top 1% of McKenzie, ND has a comparable population size of NYC or Seattle. :doh:
 
cawacko said:
The majority of wealthier voters are Republicans? Then how do you explain LA, SF, Seattle, Chicago, Boston, NY and Washington D.C. and how they vote?
Click to expand...
Cawacko, can you name any city within which the majority of its population is wealthy? You didn’t think before you posted? Respectfully, Supposn
 
Nordberg said:
Not all Repubs are bigots, but bigots are Republicans. They are the party of haters, white power types, scared people and, mysogynists,. They are also the party the wealthy know they can direct, in policy, to grant them more and more power. The Repubs work on division in America . The wealthy do that with the Republican party. They never see who is running them. They just fight with each other. They get together to hate the Dems.
That party is gone. they all gave up to trump. They simply do what he tells them to do. When Trump goes to jail, it will be a free- for- all to determine if the party has a leader or a reason to exist.
Click to expand...

Nordberg, your post’s so certain, judgemental, black or white with no compromising. I wondered as to how often I may have thought or acted upon similar severe opinions? Unlike Will Rogers, I’ve met people I’ve disliked; but I don’t think it was instantly and I’ve sometimes decided my prior judgment was wrong.
Reading your post induced me to google this. I never before thought to seek this phrase’s origin. Respectfully, Supposn


https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/there-but-for-the-grace-of-god.html

'There but for the grace of God, go I' - the meaning and origin of this ...
The story that is widely circulated is that the phrase was first spoken by the English evangelical preacher and martyr, John Bradford (circa 1510–1555). He is said to have uttered the variant of the expression - "There but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford", when seeing criminals being led to the scaffold.
 
Nordberg said:
Let me pick someone , somewhere who goes against your premise and you can pretend it means something about the whole. Only, it does not. Can you guys understand logic? The Republican party has been the party of big business and the wealthy for generations. It has not changed now. Look at Daffy and his administration of millionaires. Look at who donates to the party. This is simply fact.
Click to expand...

So you choose to avoid addressing the question which was asked and what I answered
 
Old Trapper said:
You're wrong:

https://howmuch.net/articles/average-income-of-top-1-per-cent



Teton, Wyoming - Average Income of Top 1%: $28,163,786

New York, New York - Average Income of Top 1%: $8,143,415

Fairfield, Connecticut - Average Income of Top 1%: $6,061,230

La Salle, Texas - Average Income of Top 1%: $6,021,357

Pitkin, Colorado - Average Income of Top 1%: $5,289,153

McKenzie, North Dakota - Average Income of Top 1%: $4,709,883

Shackelford, Texas - Average Income of Top 1%: $4,585,725

Westchester, New York - Average Income of Top 1%: $4,326,049

Collier, Florida - Average Income of Top 1%: $4,191,055

Union, South Dakota - Average Income of Top 1%: $4,106,670
Click to expand...

How does this tell me I'm wrong? I responded to his comment that more republicans than democrats are rich. You're post speaks to inequality within certain areas but that has nothing to do with the total number of rich people
 
Last edited:
Supposn said:
Cawacko, can you name any city within which the majority of its population is wealthy? You didn’t think before you posted? Respectfully, Supposn
Click to expand...

What does that have to do with the statement you made that I responded to?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top