I agree, on both counts. I'd go a wee bit farther in that this kind of thing is the deciding reason why I can't support the death penalty: the justice system is not perfect and can never be made perfect.Seriously. This is one of the largest reasons I am against the Death Penalty. I also believe that society owes this man a ton of cash for the misapplied "justice".
Well, I also believe that the Death Penalty is way too nice. People who have committed acts that "warrant" such a penalty do not deserve such a nice ending or release from the constant reflection that would have to take place in a nice tiny cell that they never get to leave.I agree, on both counts. I'd go a wee bit farther in that this kind of thing is the deciding reason why I can't support the death penalty: the justice system is not perfect and can never be made perfect.
Well, I also believe that the Death Penalty is way too nice. People who have committed acts that "warrant" such a penalty do not deserve such a nice ending or release from the constant reflection that would have to take place in a nice tiny cell that they never get to leave.
Perhaps we should "outsource" our worst criminals to Mexican ran prisons ?
Imagine, instead, them stuck in an 8x8 room until they leave in that narrow house assigned to all the living... One lightbulb and only the religious text of their choice to keep them company. Make available a nice post where they can affix their sheets... Well, I think you can see where I am going here.I've always been against the death penality. But in the past couple of years, I've had to reevaluate how I feel about using it for child-murderers. You know the 9 year old girl who was buried alive and found clutching her stuffed pengiun? See, if that were my niece, first of all, I would never recover, and second of all, I would want the person who did it dead, and if I had to, I would kill them myself.
So how can I preach to someone else, oh the death penality is wrong no matter what the circumstance-though I know logically that it is- when I also know full-well that if it were my niece or my nephew, God forbid, if it ever were, I wouldn't stop until that person was dead.
I've always been against the death penality. But in the past couple of years, I've had to reevaluate how I feel about using it for child-murderers. You know the 9 year old girl who was buried alive and found clutching her stuffed pengiun? See, if that were my niece, first of all, I would never recover, and second of all, I would want the person who did it dead, and if I had to, I would kill them myself.
So how can I preach to someone else, oh the death penality is wrong no matter what the circumstance-though I know logically that it is- when I also know full-well that if it were my niece or my nephew, God forbid, if it ever were, I wouldn't stop until that person was dead.
Imagine, instead, them stuck in an 8x8 room until they leave in that narrow house assigned to all the living... One lightbulb and only the religious text of their choice to keep them company. Make available a nice post where they can affix their sheets... Well, I think you can see where I am going here.
Put that child molester out in the prison general population. No protection in special solitary confinement cells.
Child molesters are the bottom of the barrel in the prison heirarchy. Do you know what happens to child molesters, if stuck in with the general prison population? I can let you guess, but I suspect its worse than death.
Yes, I know what would happen to the guy who did this to that 9 year old child, in prison. But I will bet he is not in General population. He's protected.
Suburban caucasians often wonder why urban blacks do not trust the police, or government. Why should they?
On another note, if 32 inner city kids were killed because two different gangs were battling it out in their school, would it be more than a fleeting mention in the news? Would sports teams, and The President, take time to speak about it.
Almost a decade after Columbine, we still care ONLY when it isn't poor people dying.
That same day, over 100 people died in Baghdad.
It doesn't matter if it is "THEM" dying, whether it be "foreigners", or (inser racial epithet)
It's a tough call for me. I hate the death penalty. But, these guys are the scum of the earth.
And, since I'm against torture, releasing a dude like that into the general population would be tantamout to condoning torture. Not that I'd feel bad for the dude. But, I might question my own morals. I don't know.
I hate these guys with a passion. And I can understand the desire for revenge, especially if the vicitimization happened to a relative of mine.
When you personalize it and imagine such atrocities happening to your loved ones, its only natural to want to do unspeakable acts of violence on the perpetrators, however in the discourse of what makes sense for policy and laws, the fact that our judicial system is scewed and full of flaws makes it immoral to support the death penalty. Now, in some sort of utopic society, where you either had the crime on tape or the ability to read a persons mind and know for certain even to an accuracy of 99.99999999999999% I'd probably have no problem having state sponsored killings for murderers.
If we restricted it to child-killers usc, I could get behind that.
I know how you feel, but that is an emotional thing like the VT massacre . Not a logical issue. Is it less of a crime to kill the childs mother or father as opposed to the child ?