Which came first chickenshit attitude or Republican voting

A new study predicts political behavior with 83% accuracy. It also proves the fact that conservatives are cowards. It is unclear whether being a coward makes you more likely to be Republican or if thinking like a Republican turns you into a coward.

Maybe the Republicans here can help. Were you always cowards or did you become chickenshit pansies as your political beliefs developed? Should I make a poll?

http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/sci...s-political-beliefs-with-83-percent-accuracy/

Other scans have shown that brain regions associated with risk and uncertainty, such as the fear-processing amygdala, differ in structure in liberals and conservatives. And different architecture means different behavior. Liberals tend to seek out novelty and uncertainty, while conservatives exhibit strong changes in attitude to threatening situations. The former are more willing to accept risk, while the latter tends to have more intense physical reactions to threatening stimuli.

Building on this, the new research shows that Democrats exhibited significantly greater activity in the left insula, a region associated with social and self-awareness, during the task. Republicans, however, showed significantly greater activity in the right amygdala, a region involved in our fight-or flight response system.

I'm not sure that any democrat really wants to have the conversation about who is a coward.

Democrats support whatever Obama tells them to support no matter now much it steps on democratic history.

Afraid to stand up to him.
 
Here is a liberal bear trainer that gets attacked by a bear......after the attack starts, his brain starts to function and he turns into a conservative, saving his life.


bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha

Apparently he has been watching one too many Disney movies. The bear owned his ass.
 
So, all of the poverty we see on the left is simply a result of risky and brave decision making throughout the lives of its practitioners?
Oh hell that's funny 3D. I'm way more liberal than you and I earn about three times what you do or more working in the private sector and you're still sucking on the government tit! ;)
 
It was an interesting article but the conclusion that you understood it is bullshit in the extreme....that explains some the moronic posts from you in
some of the other threads where you obviously couldn't understand simple definitions and meanings...
Anyway, the article was interesting.

On cue, as if more proof were needed :palm:
 
It was an interesting article but the conclusion that you understood it is bullshit in the extreme....that explains some the moronic posts from you in
some of the other threads where you obviously couldn't understand simple definitions and meanings...
Anyway, the article was interesting.

Yeah, you have been arguing against the conclusions of the researcher to try to twist this to fit your ignorant narrative. You contradicted yourself just as you did with your definitions.

I understand your the definitions just fine but you can only use one per term.
 
Back
Top