Which House Democrats are Socialists? Last count, 86 of Them

Libhater said:
House Republicans presented a resolution that took a firm stance against socialism and its violent dictators. This was met with surprise from the Democrats, especially their minority leader, Hakeem Jeffries, who argued that this vote undermined the party's agenda. This issue calls to mind an old adage: "Scratch a liberal, find a fascist."

In the end, 328 members of Congress voted in favor of the resolution including Nancy Pelosi and Hakeem Jeffries. However, there were still 86 other Democrats who openly opposed the legislation. These hopelessly lost Democrats made their opposition clear and unashamedly declared their love of Communism.

A list of those 86 Democrats who refused to vote for this measure have solidified their stances on socialism. List in the link below:

https://rantsofizzo.com/daniel/whic...socialists-now-we-know-thanks-to-recent-vote/


The perfect example of a Communist/Socialist who actually ran for president is of course Bernie Sanders. His name isn't in the list probably because he identifies as an Independent and not a Democrat. In my book of extreme expertise--all Democrats are Socialists in one way or another, if not in every way. Sick, anti Americanism this Socialism/Communism agenda of the Dems.
Click to expand...

Here you go over-thinking things again.

You need to take a break from politics, and take up a new hobby!

Just think, your over-thinking things has lost you the last 3 out of 4 presidential elections. :laugh:

Just' sayin!
 
Libhater said:
No fella, I'm a CAPITALIST, which is the direct opposite of a communist/socialist.
Click to expand...

So you build your own roads? Hire private police and fire? Generate your own electricity? Have a private army? Didn’t think so. And I pay more than you do for those services. You are nothing but a welfare mooch. Next?
 
Geeko Sportivo said:
Here you go over-thinking things again.

You need to take a break from politics, and take up a new hobby!

Just think, your over-thinking things has lost you the last 3 out of 4 presidential elections. :laugh:

Just' sayin!
Click to expand...

Not over thinking anything. Just giving you the facts that there are 86 House Dems that choose to be Socialists.
Now tell us, do you share the same ideology of these 86 radical socialist Dems, or do you just post stupid replies
so as to try to divert from the main message/topic of the OP, or is it both?
 
Libhater said:
Not over thinking anything. Just giving you the facts that there are 86 House Dems that choose to be Socialists.
Now tell us, do you share the same ideology of these 86 radical socialist Dems, or do you just post stupid replies
so as to try to divert from the main message/topic of the OP, or is it both?
Click to expand...

Who are you, the fascist right wing crusading dolt???????
 
Trumpet said:
If they have no idea of what education is, then it's quite easy for them to think that their limited intelligence is the answer to all problems.
Click to expand...

Turing said that people believe when they use a word they know exactly what they mean. Not until they have to explain it do they realize they did not really know all they thought they knew. Turing was an early theorist of artificial intelligence--the calculating model, you really have to work things out, step by step.
 
BidenPresident said:
Turing said that people believe when they use a word they know exactly what they mean. Not until they have to explain it do they realize they did not really know all they thought they knew. Turing was an early theorist of artificial intelligence--the calculating model, you really have to work things out, step by step.
Click to expand...

Mr Turing knows what he's talking about, if only some of that could rub-off on the Magatards.
 
Libhater said:
Not over thinking anything. Just giving you the facts that there are 86 House Dems that choose to be Socialists.
Now tell us, do you share the same ideology of these 86 radical socialist Dems, or do you just post stupid replies
so as to try to divert from the main message/topic of the OP, or is it both?
Click to expand...

No!

I don't always agree with progressives. I am more like Joe Biden, Obama, Bill, and Hillary!

Thanks!
 
Libhater said:
House Republicans presented a resolution that took a firm stance against socialism and its violent dictators. This was met with surprise from the Democrats, especially their minority leader, Hakeem Jeffries, who argued that this vote undermined the party's agenda. This issue calls to mind an old adage: "Scratch a liberal, find a fascist."

In the end, 328 members of Congress voted in favor of the resolution including Nancy Pelosi and Hakeem Jeffries. However, there were still 86 other Democrats who openly opposed the legislation. These hopelessly lost Democrats made their opposition clear and unashamedly declared their love of Communism.

A list of those 86 Democrats who refused to vote for this measure have solidified their stances on socialism. List in the link below:

https://rantsofizzo.com/daniel/whic...socialists-now-we-know-thanks-to-recent-vote/


The perfect example of a Communist/Socialist who actually ran for president is of course Bernie Sanders. His name isn't in the list probably because he identifies as an Independent and not a Democrat. In my book of extreme expertise--all Democrats are Socialists in one way or another, if not in every way. Sick, anti Americanism this Socialism/Communism agenda of the Dems.
Click to expand...

While this might be true, the linked article, such as it isn't, does nothing--NOTHING--to prove the point you are trying to make. While I could make it for you, I think this is your fight to fix. You need to do better research than the crap article you linked to prove your position.
 
Nordberg said:
In fact, Social Security is a savings program. Money is taken from par\ychecks and saved for your future. Then when you are old you can survive through the SS savings plan. SS also pays for this. https://www.investopedia.com/articl...-security-benefits-children-how-they-work.asp Kids whose parents died or wage earner passed away get help. Kids with disabilities get it too. Kids born with lifetime medical problems also get help.
FDR saw that old people were not able to exist without help. When a spouse died, or got too sick to work, help became available.
Click to expand...

It is not a savings program. No money is saved.
It's a ponzi scheme instead.

Help WAS available for the poor and destitute, long before FDR.
 
No economy can function without socialism.
Having a public sector is socialism.
Having no public sector is anarchy.
That's the other choice.
 
Trumpet said:
Do you even know what the word socialist mean????????????????????
Click to expand...

Socialism:

The taking of wealth for redistribution (or 'social' redistribution of wealth).

It comes in three major forms:
Fascism, or government manipulation of markets (example: EPA, CPSC, BATF);
Communism, or government ownership of markets (example: Federal Reserve, Social Security/Medicare/Medicaid, Obamacare);
Slavery, or ownership of people.

Democrats want all three forms of socialism. Most seem to favor fascism at the moment.

Because socialism is based on theft of wealth, it can generally only be implemented by oligarchies and dictatorships. It is tyranny.

Capitalism is the only economic system that creates wealth. Socialism cannot exist without capitalism to steal from.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top