Into the Night
Verified User
You're just not smart enough to know where you really stand.
You're just not smart enough to recognize what he stands for. Must be your college education.
You're just not smart enough to know where you really stand.
So you build your own roads? Hire private police and fire? Generate your own electricity? Have a private army? Didn’t think so. And I pay more than you do for those services. You are nothing but a welfare mooch. Next?
Who are you, the fascist right wing crusading dolt???????
Turing said that people believe when they use a word they know exactly what they mean. Not until they have to explain it do they realize they did not really know all they thought they knew. Turing was an early theorist of artificial intelligence--the calculating model, you really have to work things out, step by step.
No!
I don't always agree with progressives. I am more like Joe Biden, Obama, Bill, and Hillary!
Thanks!
WRONG. Capitalism can function without socialism. The reverse is NOT true.No economy can function without socialism.
WRONG. Public services are not necessarily socialism.Having a public sector is socialism.
WRONG. Government can exist without any public sector. A democracy is one example.Having no public sector is anarchy.
False dichotomy fallacy. Reversal fallacy.That's the other choice.
It is not an insurance program. It's a ponzi scheme, and it's unconstitutional.
House Republicans presented a resolution that took a firm stance against socialism and its violent dictators. This was met with surprise from the Democrats, especially their minority leader, Hakeem Jeffries, who argued that this vote undermined the party's agenda. This issue calls to mind an old adage: "Scratch a liberal, find a fascist."
In the end, 328 members of Congress voted in favor of the resolution including Nancy Pelosi and Hakeem Jeffries. However, there were still 86 other Democrats who openly opposed the legislation. These hopelessly lost Democrats made their opposition clear and unashamedly declared their love of Communism.
A list of those 86 Democrats who refused to vote for this measure have solidified their stances on socialism. List in the link below:
https://rantsofizzo.com/daniel/whic...socialists-now-we-know-thanks-to-recent-vote/
The perfect example of a Communist/Socialist who actually ran for president is of course Bernie Sanders. His name isn't in the list probably because he identifies as an Independent and not a Democrat. In my book of extreme expertise--all Democrats are Socialists in one way or another, if not in every way. Sick, anti Americanism this Socialism/Communism agenda of the Dems.
Capitalism verse Socialism:
https://www.prageru.com/video/capit...MIoISKm9eI_QIVk5SGCh1VQwdhEAAYASAAEgK9WfD_BwE
You are an extremely stupid person.
What is socialism, do you know???????
Yes I do know what socialism is and I couldn't give it a better description than the one posted by Into The Night from his post # 37. So, do yourself a favor and read that particular post that does detail what socialism is, and then, if you're up to it, go and find out just what describes American capitalism so as to see the total difference between the two. So, would you consider yourself to be a socialist just like the 86 congressional democrat socialists?
So, you don't know, do you??? And also Into the Scum is on my ignore list.
WRONG. Capitalism can function without socialism. The reverse is NOT true.
WRONG. Public services are not necessarily socialism.
WRONG. Government can exist without any public sector. A democracy is one example.
False dichotomy fallacy. Reversal fallacy.
You couldn't be more stupid if you took the time to try. Again, socialism is exactly how it was described in post #37.
People putting others on this 'ignore list' just goes to show that you can't possibly debate anyone without relying
on having an easy out like that in using this 'ignore list'. Man up and try debating and or at least discussing the
subject at hand. My goodness, are you still in elementary school?
How often do you feel compelled to reveal yourself as a complete idiot, Milquetoast Macaw?
We already know.
Not one of your remarks is even close to being true. As usual.
This is the typical deflect, distract, and distort reply; a way of avoiding answering a question.
How often do you feel compelled to reveal yourself as a complete idiot, Milquetoast Macaw?
We already know.
Not one of your remarks is even close to being true. As usual.
None. It does not collect a premium, it does not pay out against any loss, it does not use any actuary. It has no investors.It has all elements of an insurance program
Correct. This ponzi scheme is mandatory, dictated by government. It is unconstitutional.- just one you can't escape from.
Which is what happened. The rest is left 'holding the empty sack', so to speak. The government covers this empty sack by printing empty dollars.in a ponzi scheme - those that paid first are the only ones that get paid out.
Nope. That's what disability insurance is for.In this insurance program, young people that become disabled get paid out.