White Nationalists v Democratic Socialists!

Spewing hatred on message boards does nothing to help blacks or anybody else.

So how am I spewing hatred, exactly, by saying you have no empathy and you don't care about the concerns of black people, whom you call "fringe nuts"?


Why don't you try actually getting outside and learning about all those people and problems you rail about.

I already do that. It's why I hold this position. You should try doing that. But it would mean stepping outside the bubble in which you have insulated yourself.

You don't know any black people, so you can't possibly learn about any of this. You actively choose not to; instead, you expect people to accommodate your position while you dismiss theirs. That's because of your entitlement complex that is informed by your privilege as a white man.
'

And those solutions do not involve stupid statements such as waving a flag is intimidation

So Flash, if I waved a flag that represented the murder and arson of your family and home, and then made sure that flag was everywhere you went, flown by your neighbors, flown above every state building, adorning the bumpers of every car you see, waved in your face every single minute of every single day for your entire life, you wouldn't go screaming to your local police that I was intimidating you?

Come on. Be real.

You wouldn't last a day before you tattled to the cops.
 
Though after what he said about Castro, he definitely hurt himself.

He said nothing wrong and just told the truth. And Obama did say the same thing AND Eisenhower copied Hitler's Autobahn...


Did that make Ike a Nazi sympathizer?

Only morons would buy into the propaganda so they can vote for the guy most idiots voted for anyway.
 
You know I was talking about white supremacists as the fringe nuts--that was the whole conversation you diverted from.

Wait a second...back up.

From where would white supremacist "fringe nuts" ever get the idea that the Confederate Flag represented anything close to their beliefs?
 
ROFL..fucking IDIOT!
Inter-generational poverty is poverty "passed down" generation to generation
"upward Mobility"mean the ability of individuals to better themselves and move up in class -
within the same generational time frame

Le sigh...

If poverty is generational, then that means what for economic mobility?
 
fucking IDIOT! Baltimore is an incorporated entity.
Suburban -or Baltimore County spending is NOT taken in as a factor for per capita spending
on education in Baltimore.
Do some fucking research before spreading your screed!

Right, but within Baltimore itself, there are definitely different areas of wealth, right?

So not all the schools in Baltimore are funded at the same level, are they?
 
Baltimore schools across the board are all failing. Me thinks it's "inter-generational poverty"

“Baltimore city schools are not third in the nation they’re not even third in the state in total funding that they receive,” Baltimore City Delegate Stephanie Smith said. “We’re talking about the state contribution. The other localities in this state also contribute and they contribute at a much higher rate because they’re high wealth counties.”
https://foxbaltimore.com/news/city-...er-baltimore-schools-are-among-highest-funded

You are such a lying sophist.
 
He said nothing wrong and just told the truth. And Obama did say the same thing AND Eisenhower copied Hitler's Autobahn...



Did that make Ike a Nazi sympathizer?

Only morons would buy into the propaganda so they can vote for the guy most idiots voted for anyway.

Like it or not, Bernie needs many of those idiots to vote for him to win.
 
Like it or not, Bernie needs many of those idiots to vote for him to win.

Any of these folks who voted for radical change never got it as Trump stole the policy ideas but did not deliver because he's a fraud. Bernie is the real deal and anyone with even half a brain will cross over. The racists bigots and birthers will stay true to the bloviated racketeer.
It's also important to remember that the eventual Democratic nominee does not need any Trump voters to win. Indeed, Trump got a smaller fraction of the vote than Mitt Romney did in 2012 — Hillary Clinton just lost a ton of support from Obama voters in critical regions who either voted for third-party candidates or didn't vote at all in 2016. Just repeating Obama's 2012 performance would surely do the trick — indeed, even performing just slightly better than Clinton in the three key swing states of Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania (in none of which did Trump get a majority) would do it.

https://theweek.com/articles/858705/bernie-sanders-beat-trump
 
Any of these folks who voted for radical change never got it as Trump stole the policy ideas but did not deliver because he's a fraud. Bernie is the real deal and anyone with even half a brain will cross over. The racists bigots and birthers will stay true to the bloviated racketeer.

Sure, but there are plenty of Centrists who didn't vote in the last election. These people could vote for Bernie, but if he keeps up the commie crap, he's going to scare them off. They won't vote for Trump, but they won't vote for Bernie either. And with the electoral college, Bernie can't just get more votes to win, he needs to do great.
 
Well, museums are important because they provide historical context for what's being exhibited there.

That context is absent when outside that environment.

By ripping a flag out of the museum context and declaring it means something new, you are erasing history.

strained and idiotic.
 
Sure, but there are plenty of Centrists who didn't vote in the last election. These people could vote for Bernie, but if he keeps up the commie crap, he's going to scare them off. They won't vote for Trump, but they won't vote for Bernie either. And with the electoral college, Bernie can't just get more votes to win, he needs to do great.

What commie crap? It's the propaganda machine bringing this nonsense up. There's a monstrosity squatting in The White House who sucks up to murderous dictators on a daily basis and that is all that needs to be driven home.

It's also important to remember that the eventual Democratic nominee does not need any Trump voters to win. Indeed, Trump got a smaller fraction of the vote than Mitt Romney did in 2012 — Hillary Clinton just lost a ton of support from Obama voters in critical regions who either voted for third-party candidates or didn't vote at all in 2016. Just repeating Obama's 2012 performance would surely do the trick — indeed, even performing just slightly better than Clinton in the three key swing states of Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania (in none of which did Trump get a majority) would do it.

https://theweek.com/articles/858705/bernie-sanders-beat-trump
 
Last edited:
What commie crap? It's the propaganda machine bringing this nonsense up. There's a monstrosity squatting in The White House who sucks up to murderous dictators on a daily basis and that is all that needs to be driven home.

No, the black boy left in 2017.
 
ROFL..fucking IDIOT!
Inter-generational poverty is poverty "passed down" generation to generation
"upward Mobility"mean the ability of individuals to better themselves and move up in class -
within the same generational time frame

fucking IDIOT! Baltimore is an incorporated entity.
Suburban -or Baltimore County spending is NOT taken in as a factor for per capita spending
on education in Baltimore.
Do some fucking research before spreading your screed!

Baltimore schools across the board are all failing. Me thinks it's "inter-generational poverty"
the same reason poor black men deal dope to support their family. and that is not slamming blacks
it's a statement of how many families get money ( selling to suburban white customers)

:rofl2::rofl2::rofl2:

STFU you stupid racist mufucka.....


You know shit about Blacks and how they get their money

THIS IS WHAT YOU SUPPORT WHEN YOU VOTE REPUBLICAN, CONSERVATIVE, MODERATE, BLUEDOG, INDEPENDENT........
 
“Baltimore city schools are not third in the nation they’re not even third in the state in total funding that they receive,” Baltimore City Delegate Stephanie Smith said. “We’re talking about the state contribution. The other localities in this state also contribute and they contribute at a much higher rate because they’re high wealth counties.”
https://foxbaltimore.com/news/city-...er-baltimore-schools-are-among-highest-funded

You are such a lying sophist.
WTF? I never said they were over-funded. I did say the funding does NOT equate to good results.
Baltimore schools are some of the worst in the nation, and that is independent of funding.
The state throws massive amounts of spending, and for little to no results.
Liberals are so fucking stoopid all they think of is "spend more money" but funding CLEARLY is not the issue for abject failures
According to the most recent census data, the district ranks 3rd in the country among the 100 largest districts in America, spending $16,184 per-pupil.

13 Baltimore City High Schools, zero students proficient in math
https://foxbaltimore.com/news/proje...high-schools-zero-students-proficient-in-math
 
Le sigh...

If poverty is generational, then that means what for economic mobility?
you idiot. the topic was "economic mobility".
Look at the Baltimore schools. they are resistant to putting out good students. It's not because of lack of funding. It's the failure to lead by politicians ( Like dead Elijah Cummings), and generational poverty

Baltimore is a Democratic city -the answer is always "spend more money" from dems
but that's not whats happening for the reason in systematic breakdown
 
WTF? I never said they were over-funded. I did say the funding does NOT equate to good results.

You don't know that because you're not looking at them on a school-by-school basis, you're simply lumping them all together into a per capita amount and then applying that oversimplification to your argument.

In other words, you are exercising sophistry.


Baltimore schools are some of the worst in the nation, and that is independent of funding.

Yet, schools in other major cities are fine.


The state throws massive amounts of spending, and for little to no results.

As the quote said, state funding is just one part of the equation...counties themselves contribute funding to the schools in addition to the funding they get from the state. I mean, it's literally in the quote.


Liberals are so fucking stoopid all they think of is "spend more money" but funding CLEARLY is not the issue for abject failures

But we know that comparatively, the frame of reference you are using to judge the failure of Baltimore schools is within the context of Maryland schools in general, and we know that Maryland schools get local funding in addition to the state funding they get from Annapolis.

So as usual, you exercise sophistry to paper over the massive factual deficits that exist in your argument.
 
you idiot. the topic was "economic mobility".

And you just argued that poverty is generational...which means that there is no economic mobility if your poverty is determined by the circumstances of your birth.

YOU FUCKING CLOWN.
 
Look at the Baltimore schools. they are resistant to putting out good students. It's not because of lack of funding. It's the failure to lead by politicians ( Like dead Elijah Cummings), and generational poverty

What a fucking idiot.

So you spend all your time arguing that generational poverty isn't the same thing as economic mobility, before going on to argue that generational poverty is why those people don't experience economic mobility.

You are really, really stupid, and really, really bad at this.
 
A Sanders supporter shot at and severely wounded a Republican Congressmen.

giphy.gif
[/IMG]
 
Back
Top