White Rage

Like I said - it's an intellectually dishonest argument to try to assert that Hispanics are not a minority in this country, and are treated and viewed the same as whites.

You know that, but you dug in too deep at this point. Continue to argue it, though; it just makes you look like a bigger fool.

Shithead, they may be a minority but they are still white. How many times do I have to tell you this? Therefore it is incorrect to say that Zimmerman is half white.

In the context of this thread, the half white comment was made by an ignorant racist asshole in an unsuccessful attempt to discredit the OP.
 
You calling anyone a "dunce" after this comment is rich, extremely rich indeed:

Come on, at least have enough class to shut the fuck up and go away after this despicable demonstration of intellectual prowess!

Dear whiney vagina man dunce; is this all you have in that pathetic dull life of misery you wallow in?

I point at you and laugh at your stupidity but perhaps I should just pity you for being so incredibly pathetic and dumb.
 
Idiot, the thread is about whites attitudes towards blacks, not simply one very good example of a white rage miscarriage of justice.

Dear shit-for-brains; the thread exclusively uses the Zimmerman case to promote an incredibly false and stupid race hustling premise suggesting that Sanford police coyly “tolerated” the actual killing of an unarmed black child, but yet refuse to “tolerate” any anger expressed for the acquittal of his murderer because they are ... wait for it....WHITE!

Then the dullard premise goes on to stupidly proclaim; "This is the new Jim Crow realized.

I realize you are a retarded dunce who cannot comprehend simple English or basic math so I won't hold my breath thinking that continually pointing out the OBVIUS to idiots like you will make any difference in your pathetic woefully lacking life.
 
Dear shit-for-brains; the thread exclusively uses the Zimmerman case to promote an incredibly false and stupid race hustling premise suggesting that Sanford police coyly “tolerated” the actual killing of an unarmed black child, but yet refuse to “tolerate” any anger expressed for the acquittal of his murderer because they are ... wait for it....WHITE!

Then the dullard premise goes on to stupidly proclaim; "This is the new Jim Crow realized.

I realize you are a retarded dunce who cannot comprehend simple English or basic math so I won't hold my breath thinking that continually pointing out the OBVIUS to idiots like you will make any difference in your pathetic woefully lacking life.

Read the entire linked article moron. That is what the thread is about, the Zim trial is just an example.

You really are too stupid to be yurt.
 
Facts;
1. Travon was shot to death... after beating the shit out of Zimmerman who was doing nothing illegal.
2. Zimmerman shot him... after Martin beat the shit out of him.
3. There is no self defence possible, since Zim got out of his car.... getting out of the car did not give Martin the right to beat the shit out of Zimmerman.
4. The police did not treat the crime scene as a crime scene since they were good old boys...
5. The town of Sanford has a well deserved reputation for racism.

fixed those for you.
 
I have yet to see one iota of proof in counter to the explicit proof I posted. Here read it again (I mean read it) and prove me wrong, cloud sower
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_people

Whats to learn that we didn't already know.....over the centuries, race and racial recognition and definitions have been fluid....in countries all over the world...

Thats it in a nutshell....you prove nothing but the differing worldwide opinions of people about race over the years...
 
Facts;
1. Travon was shot to death.
2. Zimmerman shot him.
3. There is no self defence possible, since Zim got out of his car.
4. The police did not treat the crime scene as a crime scene since they were good old boys.
5. The town of Sanford has a well deserved reputation for racism.

1 and 2 are undeniable.
3-Holey shit....he got out of his car and so could no longer claim he was attacked and had to defend himself.....thats a revelation....
4 and 5- irrelevant opinion.
 
1 and 2 are undeniable.
3-Holey shit....he got out of his car and so could no longer claim he was attacked and had to defend himself.....thats a revelation....
4 and 5- irrelevant opinion.

4. Completely relevant, in fact the exact issue of the OP.

5. Not Opinion. Well known proven fact.

That he got out of his car indicates that
1. He was not in fear of his life.
2. He approached Travon
3. He ignored the will of the police, whom he had twice agreed to meet
4. That he was the aggressor
 
We've suddenly all turned into Corrine Brown? Hispanic people and white people all look the same to her (her own words), therefore it is all White so long as it isn't black? What about Asians are they also white now when it is convenient to the argument? I just want to know what the rules are currently so we can all follow the same thing.

Are Hispanics only White when they defend themselves, or are they white when they're hired for work too? If they are really White how can they possibly have their own Caucus in the Congress wouldn't that be like having a Congressional White Caucus?
 
4. Completely relevant, in fact the exact issue of the OP.

5. Not Opinion. Well known proven fact.

That he got out of his car indicates that
1. He was not in fear of his life.
2. He approached Travon
3. He ignored the will of the police, whom he had twice agreed to meet
4. That he was the aggressor

That list is nonsense.
1. One can not be afraid until they have their head pounding on concrete and then fear for their lives. In fact, I would likely not be afraid much either, until I had my head pounding on the concrete.
2. There is no evidence of that, even from the ear witness Trayvon said something to GZ as he approached GZ.
3. You have no evidence of that either, from the call we hear him stop when he was told they didn't need him to follow him. Here is where all the reasonable doubt comes flowing in...
4. And from all of this we can figure out that your assumption here is only an assumption. While I don't necessarily think it proves GZ innocent, I do believe that there is very strong reasonable doubt here.

There is a reason the jury decided as they did, it was because the evidence doesn't show what you want it to show, not beyond a reasonable doubt.
 
My god Simplefreak, when I saw the same thought train from Granoob I didn't bother trying to correct it. In your case, it can't be let go.

DID YOU READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE?

It isn't about Zimmerman (who is white by the way, as are all hispanics (regardless of what some unelected government flacky wrote on a form one day)

It is about the white cops, the black body, the white town (Sanford) the white jurors, and the wholesale disgusting racism displayed by whites toward blacks nationwide.

I shouldn't have to explain this to you.

You took a cheap shot, too cheap for who you are.

Explanation of Race and Hispanic Origin Categories

Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Internet Release date: September 15, 1999

The race and Hispanic origin categories used by the Census Bureau are mandated
by Office of Management and Budget Directive No. 15, which requires all
federal record keeping and data presentation to use four race categories
(White, Black, American Indian and Alaska Native, Asian and Pacific Islander)
and two ethnicity categories (Hispanic, non-Hispanic). These classifications
are not intended to be scientific in nature, but are designed to promote
consistency in federal record keeping and data presentation.

It is important to recognize that this system treats race and ethnicity as
separate and independent categories. This means that within the federal system
everyone is classified as both a member of one of the four race groups and also
as either Hispanic or non-Hispanic. Consequently, there are a total of 8
race-ethnicity categories, as illustrated by the table below:

…………U.S. Population by Race and Hispanic Origin, July 1, 1997..(in thousands)

………………….White……Black….American Indian……Asian & Pacific
………………...……………………....& Alaska Native……….Islander

non-Hispanic 194,571 …32,324……1,977 ………………9,532

Hispanic………. 26,746….1,649………347………………… 598





As the above table illustrates, the Hispanic population is predominately White.
Because the number of Hispanics in the Black, American Indian & Alaska Native,
and Asian & Pacific Islander categories is relatively small and thus difficult
to estimate accurately at smaller levels of geography, our tables which display
race and Hispanic origin information divide only the White category by
ethnicity. The complete race by Hispanic origin breakdown is available in our
data sets.
 
Last edited:
I post an article and I'm a whore - this is how the right ring mind works.

Do you have a reading comprehension problem; or are you just that incredibly dishonest. He called you a race hustling whore shit-for-brains. It was a pretty accurate description as well.

You post a provocative stupid premise and then whine when you are called on it; I think we need to amend that description to whiney pathetic race hustling whore.

Feel better now?
 
Back
Top