Yes, but so far you have failed.
White Rage
- Thread starter Cancel 2016.11
- Start date
Yes, but so far you have failed.
Hispanics are brown when liberals use them to claim they are discriminated against by white republicans.
The op is built around a logical fallacy. The police have a responsibility to protect people and property. Given the unrest surrounding the Zimmerman trial, being proactive was not Jim Crowe.
Prove it. No one else could.
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
Zimmy said so....that's good enough for them.
Right, the proof is on your side... prove GZ attacked, apparently well paid prosecutors who are infinitely more qualified than you couldn't.
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
Agreed but the reverse is also true to any objective minded observer. No one knows, for a fact, who initiated the physical confrontation.
Admit then that was was no proof one way or the other.
What you seem to forget is that proof is not required, only reasonable doubt, yet all of you act as if the verdict is proof! It is not.
Exactly.
BINGO! The title would have been more accurate if Snarla had typed Liberal White Rage.
LMAO; six women would disagree with the reverse claim that Zimmerman jumped Trayvon. They found him not guilty.
But I'm certain that no matter how many times this fact is typed, leftist dunces stuck on permanent stupid will continue their race hustling stupidity.
Wrong again you incredibly dense moron; we're saying the trial is over and a jury of six women found Zimmerman not guilty. Morons like you want to keep trying him. But then, Liberals never did have much use for the Constitution, truth, reality or the facts.
Liberals are much better at constructing strawmen claims and fabricating their own version of reality so that they can continue to wallow in blissful ignorance.
By the way, where did you come up with the stupid claim this was a "white" neighborhood? Proof that you leftist dunces don't have a clue and are too lazy to verify anything that hasn't been spoon fed to you like gullible twits.
LMAO; yeah dunce, there was no proof that Zimmerman was telling the truth. That is why a jury of six women including one black, acquitted him. Because there was NO proof.
You're really too stupid to take serious. It's just fun sticking a finger in your eye when you erupt with such stupidity.
maineman
Banned
As a liberal, my own personal opinion is that GZ got away with murder... but that happens sometimes in our criminal justice system....just like folks get sent away sometimes for crimes they didn't commit. Shit happens. I am a firm believer in karma and I have no doubt that GZ will "pay" for his treatment of Trayvon at some point in his life.... and I also know that other folks, like Michael Dunn, will "pay" a little bit on behalf of GZ, so it all works out in the end.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
If only he hadn't attacked a man who was walking in his own neighborhood.
Also... Sanford FL is 30% black, 20% Hispanic... so pretending it was a white neighborhood is ridiculous.
Your post should have started thus; "as a brain dead Liberal, I'm stupid enough to believe that Zimmerman got away with murder even after all the evidence to the contrary and a jury of six women acquitted him. "
In addition, you could add that you're so incredibly stupid that you are wiling to engage in race hustling and continue to try the case infinitum.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
No one knows as a fact, true. But we can see the evidence. Defensive wounds on Zimmerman, none on Martin. But you pretend not to notice that little fact. The gun shot trajectory indicates Martin was on top. But you pretend not to notice that. The girlfriend of Martin said she heard Martin ask the first question, so we have a good indication that he indeed started the verbal confrontation. But you pretend to not notice that. All evidence points in one direction, but you want to pretend that it is a toss up.
I don't think Liberals pretend; they really are that lazy and that stupid.
maineman
Banned
juries of peers have convicted innocent folks many times.... just like juries have acquitted guilty ones... it happens in a criminal justice system that relies on the input of fallible peers. No big deal. GZ is forever innocent of the murder of Trayvon. There is no sense in retrying that case at all. Like I said, I believe that he'll get his comeuppance at some point in his life, and in the meantime, guys like Dunn will be collecting a little extra 'cum-up-pants' on GZ's behalf so it's all good.
Fascinating; yet in post #113 you stated he got away with murder. Is he guilty or innocent?
Yet that is exactly what liberals have been, and are doing on this thread and many other threads throughout the Internet. Persecuting and prosecuting Zimmerman thus denying him any peace and his Constitutional rights. Proof that Liberals like using the Constitution as their personal asswhipe.
maineman
Banned
stupid question.... he will always be innocent in the eyes of the law....and those eyes are all that really count, until he meets his maker, or until he meets a group of folks in a dark alley.... then the eyes of the law will be unable to see much.
I, for one, am all for letting nature take its course and letting karma play its part - whatever that might be.