White Rage

maineman said:
stupid question.... he will always be innocent in the eyes of the law....and those eyes are all that really count, until he meets his maker, or until he meets a group of folks in a dark alley.... then the eyes of the law will be unable to see much.


I, for one, am all for letting nature take its course and letting karma play its part - whatever that might be.
Click to expand...

So asking you to clarify your contorted versions here is stupid? First you say he is guilty of murder then you say he is innocent; how is it stupid to ask for clarification when your responses jump all over the place?

As to your statement that he meets a group of folks in a dark alley; what does that mean? That you're okay with vigilante justice? Who would those folks be; a group of young blacks, or an angry crowd of white race hustling Liberals?

You end with claiming you're letting Karma play it's part; what part would that be?
 
Truth Detector said:
So asking you to clarify your contorted versions here is stupid? First you say he is guilty of murder then you say he is innocent; how is it stupid to ask for clarification when your responses jump all over the place?
Click to expand...
Maybe you didn't know this, but I actually was not on the jury.... so I really don't get a say in whether GZ is officially guilty or innocent in the eyes of the law. I AM, however, entitled to my personal opinion. My personal opinion is that GZ got away with murder... my personal opinion is that OJ got away with murder too, but my personal opinion matters only to me.

As to your statement that he meets a group of folks in a dark alley; what does that mean? That you're okay with vigilante justice? Who would those folks be; a group of young blacks, or an angry crowd of white race hustling Liberals?

You end with claiming you're letting Karma play it's part; what part would that be?
Click to expand...

it means I am OK with karma playing its part... and who I am to decide what that part ought to be? Karma doesn't need or want my input.
 
maineman said:
Maybe you didn't know this, but I actually was not on the jury.... so I really don't get a say in whether GZ is officially guilty or innocent in the eyes of the law. I AM, however, entitled to my personal opinion. My personal opinion is that GZ got away with murder... my personal opinion is that OJ got away with murder too, but my personal opinion matters only to me.

it means I am OK with karma playing its part... and who I am to decide what that part ought to be? Karma doesn't need or want my input.
Click to expand...

LMAO.
 
Laughing! Came here this morning to find someone's finger got stuck on the groan button.

Guess he couldn't handle the compliment I gave him, bawahahahaha.

OMG, she is being nice, WTF do I do? I know groan all her posts! Okay, I am in my comfort zone once, again. Phew! Glad we avoided that crisis.
 
Superfreak said:
No one knows as a fact, true. But we can see the evidence. Defensive wounds on Zimmerman, none on Martin. But you pretend not to notice that little fact. The gun shot trajectory indicates Martin was on top. But you pretend not to notice that. The girlfriend of Martin said she heard Martin ask the first question, so we have a good indication that he indeed started the verbal confrontation. But you pretend to not notice that. All evidence points in one direction, but you want to pretend that it is a toss up.
Click to expand...

You pretend he had to kill the kid. He brought a gun to a fist fight.
 
Superfreak said:
If only he hadn't attacked a man who was walking in his own neighborhood.

Also... Sanford FL is 30% black, 20% Hispanic... so pretending it was a white neighborhood is ridiculous.
Click to expand...

Again, there is zero proof. All that was required for a not guilty finding was reasonable doubt.
I know you know what this means, but I am going to explain it for the incredibly moronic Truth Detector and also for Damo who is exhibiting signs of selective memory.

If there was even a possibility that the defendant did not commit the crime, then "reasonable doubt" exists, and the jury (or Judge) cannot convict.

Thus, a not guilty finding is proof of; ......wait for it......absolutely nothing.

So, Simple minded freak, stop doing yourself the injustice of proclaiming an unknown as if it were a fact. Indeed, there is simply no way to know, especially since the good ol boys didn't bother to collect evidence at the scene. Dead black child, white guy with gun, case closed.

You are way to smart to refuse to think about this and keep repeating not guilty, not guilty ad-infinitum. Think, then post.
 
Truth Detector said:
Wrong again you incredibly dense moron; we're saying the trial is over and a jury of six women found Zimmerman not guilty. Morons like you want to keep trying him. But then, Liberals never did have much use for the Constitution, truth, reality or the facts.

Liberals are much better at constructing strawmen claims and fabricating their own version of reality so that they can continue to wallow in blissful ignorance.

By the way, where did you come up with the stupid claim this was a "white" neighborhood? Proof that you leftist dunces don't have a clue and are too lazy to verify anything that hasn't been spoon fed to you like gullible twits.
Click to expand...

Simpleton; show where I said it was a white neighbohood. Or shut your pus oozing sore, since I never said that.
 
Superfreak said:
No one knows as a fact, true. But we can see the evidence. Defensive wounds on Zimmerman, none on Martin. But you pretend not to notice that little fact. The gun shot trajectory indicates Martin was on top. But you pretend not to notice that. The girlfriend of Martin said she heard Martin ask the first question, so we have a good indication that he indeed started the verbal confrontation. But you pretend to not notice that. All evidence points in one direction, but you want to pretend that it is a toss up.
Click to expand...

I'm curious about the so-called defensive wounds. GZ had a bloody nose and cuts on the back of his head, how are those "defensive"?

By one example "Defensive wounds are often found on the hands and forearms, where the victim has raised them to protect the head and face or to fend off an assault, but may also be present on the feet and legs where a victim attempts defense while lying down and kicking out at the assailant."

GZ's wounds can also be consistent with him slipping on wet grass and falling onto the sidewalk.
 
Superfreak said:
If only he hadn't attacked a man who was walking in his own neighborhood.

Also... Sanford FL is 30% black, 20% Hispanic... so pretending it was a white neighborhood is ridiculous.
Click to expand...

Dipshit, if it is 30% black then it is 70% white excluding Asians. WTF Simplefreak.

I am going to have to stop defending your intelligence pretty soon.
 
Rune said:
Simpleton; show where I said it was a white neighbohood. Or shut your pus oozing sore, since I never said that.
Click to expand...

My bad; that was MOTT who made that moronic claim. It's hard separating the race hustling dunces on the forum; after a while, you're dimwitted talking points all start looking alike.

;)
 
christiefan915 said:
I'm curious about the so-called defensive wounds. GZ had a bloody nose and cuts on the back of his head, how are those "defensive"?
Click to expand...

LMAO; you really are THAT stupid. Gee I don't know race hustling dunce; maybe because he was on the ground in a "defensive" mode being pummulled MMA style.

Would it make you feel better if they were called offensive wounds brought about by a young black thug wanting to teach the cracker a lesson while he tried to beat him senseless?
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Agreed but the reverse is also true to any objective minded observer. No one knows, for a fact, who initiated the physical confrontation.
Click to expand...

Absolutely. As I said, I don't know if GZ was attacked, but I do know there wasn't enough evidence to convict him. We can't just convict because he has a white sounding name. I also know the accused doesn't have to prove anything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top