So, on one side I have actual data related to fraudulent votes. I have the AZ Cyber Ninjas audit which found nothing close to what was required to change the result in the state.
I have the results of Georgia's audit which also found nothing close enough fraud to change the results in the state.
I have investigations done into multiple claims of fraud that were found to not be fraud.
I have a movie that claimed thousands of "mules" that couldn't produce one mule.
I have an awareness of the security measures in states' election process. I also have an awareness of what would be required to actually "steal" a national election and how incredibly difficult it would be to do so.
On the other side, there are ~200 pages of people saying they believe they saw something.
So, looking at the evidence for the two possibilities, why would I align my beliefs with the option that has so little support?