It seems you think all Republicans should be punished for the election fraud of some Republicans. Is that really your stance?
Who is Denying the Stealing of the 2020 Election
- Thread starter IBDaMann
- Start date
Avoiding providing even one affidavit? Your argument is summarily dismissed since you can't support it.
When did I claim there were no affidavits? I have said the courts dismissed the affidavits for not having evidence of any wrong doing.
You on the other hand have said that there were thousands showing of affidavits proving fraud. I am still waiting for you to even present us with even one affidavit that proves fraud.
I think we can summarily dismiss your argument at this point since you have provided no support for it.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
All Republicans who commit election fraud should answer for it.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Already provided. Are you avoiding all affidavits? Wow.
Great. Your knee-jerk denial is noted for the record. Enjoy.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
You assert that the only affidavits that exist are the ones I post that you will review, and you won't look at any, ergo, you imply that none exist. You won't even look at the ones that are posted here on JPP and were discussed. You are actively avoiding them because you don't want to face the reality that Donald Trump won all three times he ran. You have too much emotional equity invested in your TDS-driven fantasy.
LOL. Did the monsters under your bed tell this?
The average number of registered voters in a PA precinct is about 1,000.
In Philadelphia there were about 740,000 votes in 2024 in 1703 precincts. Are you able to do the math?
Care to tell us where any NGO got caught farming thousands of ballots in a precinct that doesn't have even 1500 eligible voters? At this point Matt, you are revealing you are a gullible idiot that will believe things that are impossible in reality.
Last edited:
So Trump cheated? That is your argument when it comes to Democrats.
No. You have provide zero affidavits. Claiming you provided something when you clearly haven't only shows how disingenuous you are.
Your claim is summarily dismissed using your standard.
Your failure to provide any evidence of ever providing any affidavits is noted for the record.
Your argument that thousands of affidavits exist is summarily dismissed. for failing to provide evidence.
Your argument that you already provided affidavits is summarily dismissed for failure to provide evidence.
I see you have decided to also lie about the position I have taken on affidavits.
I have never said that no affidavits exist. I have said that thousands do not exist. You have refused to provide any evidence of those thousand of affidavits.
Since you have provided no evidence of the thousands of affidavits, I asked for evidence of even one affidavit that proves fraud as you claimed the affidavits do. You have not provided one affidavit that proves election fraud.
I have posted about 7 affidavits that exist that were presented to courts in PA and found by the courts to not contain any evidence of election fraud. Your claim that I won't look at any affidavits is a lie. You are the one avoiding discussing actual affidavits since you can't present a single affidavit for perusal to see if it contains actual evidence of election fraud.
Your argument that thousands of affidavits exist is summarily dismissed for failing to provide evidence.
Your argument that you already provided affidavits is summarily dismissed for failure to provide evidence.
SlaveForChrist
Verified User
Sorry, shit-for-brains, but it was, in fact, a complete sentence - one that directly and completely answered the question posed in the thread title. Apparently that upsets cumdumpsters like yourself
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Sorry, pummeled colon, but no, it was not a complete sentence. You obviously failed the English comprehension portion of the SAT.
You wrote "Anyone with a functioning brain" which has a subject but has no predicate. It does not express a complete thought.
Go back to school.
Into the Night
Verified User
DON'T TRY TO BLAME DEMOCRAT ELECTION FRAUD ON REPUBLICANS!
Into the Night
Verified User
Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Into the Night
Verified User
Courts don't dismiss affidavits, moron.
There are.
RQAA
Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Into the Night
Verified User
He is not specifying a standard. You simply refuse to look for any affidavits.
Into the Night
Verified User
Special pleading fallacy. Election fraud by Democrats occurred in every State and in the SOTNY and SDTC.
Into the Night
Verified User
No, it wasn't a complete sentence. Go learn English.
ZenMode
Well-known member
Soooooo.......
11 pages into your thread (and probably hundreds of total pages, spanning multiple threads) and all you have provided as support for your claim of a stolen election is a) the fact that more people voted in the last election and b) stories from people who think they saw something.