Who is Denying the Stealing of the 2020 Election

Would you prefer a federal takeover of the election process?
I would prefer a federally mandated biometric blockchain.

States have a right to be non-democratic for state politics, but the federal elections have suffrage mandated by amendment. The only detriment would be if the federal election requirements were less secure or accessible which biometric blockchains are not.
 
So, on one side I have actual data related to fraudulent votes. I have the AZ Cyber Ninjas audit which found nothing close to what was required to change the result in the state.
and what is the detection rate for fraud in that audit?

Let me be clear:
Of the number of fraudulent ballots identified, how many ballots were in actual fact fraudulent?
 
I would prefer a federally mandated biometric blockchain.

States have a right to be non-democratic for state politics, but the federal elections have suffrage mandated by amendment. The only detriment would be if the federal election requirements were less secure or accessible which biometric blockchains are not.
fuck biometric Blockchains forever.

biometric blockchains are the mark of Satan.
 
I see you can't tell us when that happened
I see you are fixated on bogus position assignments to distract away from the fact that counting "votes" (fraudulent ballots) for WEEKS upon WEEKS is NOT normal.
so once again we are left with IBDaMann's requirement that your argument be summarily dismissed.
Yes, I've summarily dismissed your bogus position assignment... ergo, the eyeroll.
 
I see you are fixated on bogus position assignments to distract away from the fact that counting "votes" (fraudulent ballots) for WEEKS upon WEEKS is NOT normal.

Yes, I've summarily dismissed your bogus position assignment... ergo, the eyeroll.
I see you are going to continue to tell this lie that you can't provide any supporting evidence for.

Provide your evidence of fraudulent ballots being counted. Failure to provide such evidence will be an admission on your part that you are lying about fraudulent ballots.
 
I see you are fixated on bogus position assignments to distract away from the fact that counting "votes" (fraudulent ballots) for WEEKS upon WEEKS is NOT normal.
Certification has never occurred until weeks after the election. It is very normal for the ballot counting to take more than a week. I am still waiting for you to tell us which election the counting was finished on election day.
I tell you what, I will give you even more of a benefit of the doubt. Tell us which Presidential election since WW2 you think the ballots were all counted within a week. Then we can find out when those elections were certified and see if you are correct.
 
Certification has never occurred until weeks after the election.
This discussion isn't about certification.
It is very normal for the ballot counting to take more than a week.
No, it isn't.
I am still waiting for you to tell us which election the counting was finished on election day.
Most states finish the vast majority of their counting on election day itself. THAT is the norm.

Of course there's little odds and ends left over that do naturally take longer to receive and count (overseas, etc), but those votes typically aren't enough to make a difference, which is why most election results can be called on election night.

What is NOT normal is for states (e.g. California, Arizona, Pennsylvania, etc) to take WEEKS to count their ballots, and to keep "finding" more and more ballots to count during that time, and for those states to regularly have "nailbiter" races that DAMN NEAR ALWAYS go to the Demonkkkrat candidate whenever it is "too close to call" on election night.

Then there's states like Wisconsin in which every other county can get essentially all of their ballots counted on election day EXCEPT for Milwaukee County, which ALWAYS comes up with some lame excuse that "sets them back a handful of hours", which allows them to manufacture fraudulent ballots for their patented "3am ballot dump" that steals close races from Republicans in Wisconsin. It's funny how Milwaukee keeps GAINING in "votes" each cycle even though they keep LOSING population each cycle.
 
This discussion isn't about certification.

No, it isn't.

Most states finish the vast majority of their counting on election day itself. THAT is the norm.

Of course there's little odds and ends left over that do naturally take longer to receive and count (overseas, etc), but those votes typically aren't enough to make a difference, which is why most election results can be called on election night.

What is NOT normal is for states (e.g. California, Arizona, Pennsylvania, etc) to take WEEKS to count their ballots, and to keep "finding" more and more ballots to count during that time, and for those states to regularly have "nailbiter" races that DAMN NEAR ALWAYS go to the Demonkkkrat candidate whenever it is "too close to call" on election night.

Then there's states like Wisconsin in which every other county can get essentially all of their ballots counted on election day EXCEPT for Milwaukee County, which ALWAYS comes up with some lame excuse that "sets them back a handful of hours", which allows them to manufacture fraudulent ballots for their patented "3am ballot dump" that steals close races from Republicans in Wisconsin. It's funny how Milwaukee keeps GAINING in "votes" each cycle even though they keep LOSING population each cycle.
Name the state that finishes counting on election day. I will prove you a liar.
By the way no county in Wisconsin finishes counting ballots on election day.
 
Name the state that finishes counting on election day. I will prove you a liar.
By the way no county in Wisconsin finishes counting ballots on election day.
🦜 "it doesn't happen, it doesn't happen, it doesn't happen 🦜

:seenoevil: :hearnoevil:

^^^
That's you.

I've already told you what happens in Wisconsin. I watch it for myself each and every (s)election cycle. I'm not going to deny what I see and hear with my own eyes and ears. I'm not a dishonest partisan hack like you are.
 
Name the state that finishes counting on election day. I will prove you a liar.

🦜 "it doesn't happen, it doesn't happen, it doesn't happen 🦜

:seenoevil: :hearnoevil:

^^^
That's you.

I've already told you what happens in Wisconsin. I watch it for myself each and every (s)election cycle. I'm not going to deny what I see and hear with my own eyes and ears. I'm not a dishonest partisan hack like you are.
Do you know what the deadline is for provisional ballots in Wisconsin?
Can a provisional ballot be counted on election day? If a ballot is counted after election day does that mean not all ballots were counted on election day?

A provisional ballot will not be counted unless the voter provides the required information to the poll workers by 8:00 p.m. on Election Day or the municipal clerk by 4:00 p.m. of the Friday following the election.

It looks like you don't know the first thing about what happens in Wisconsin when it comes to ballot counting. The counties count the election day ballots that are not provisional but they don't count all the ballots.
 
Do you know what the deadline is for provisional ballots in Wisconsin?
Can a provisional ballot be counted on election day? If a ballot is counted after election day does that mean not all ballots were counted on election day?

A provisional ballot will not be counted unless the voter provides the required information to the poll workers by 8:00 p.m. on Election Day or the municipal clerk by 4:00 p.m. of the Friday following the election.

It looks like you don't know the first thing about what happens in Wisconsin when it comes to ballot counting. The counties count the election day ballots that are not provisional but they don't count all the ballots.
This discussion isn't about provisional ballots (which are typically inconsequential in number). Stop purposely focusing on the mote instead of focusing on the beam. Stop being a moron.
 
Back
Top