Who is Trump Talking About?


Sorry, I warned you. Hate to see anyone go through all that for nothing. Let it be known for anyone reading this that I've made my stance crystal clear in previous comments, and let him know any further attempts for him to get his hate fix from me would be fruitless. I don't know what he's blabbering about now, but I guarantee it's wouldn't do jack to persuade me. I'll copy and paste this message every single time he 'quotes' me on this subject.
 
You're right. I did make mention and I shouldn't have because I can't speak to what specific dead individuals knew or didn't know. Remove Sinwar from my comments. His mention is immaterial.

As was the case in October, you make claims and provide no basis for them. You can start by posting some images of these supposed "Hamas" fighters.
I'm relaying information that has been reported, which is that Hamas and Sinwar were behind the 10/7 attack. Yes, those doing some/most/all of the fighting were al Qassam. al Qassam is reported as the military arm of Hamas.

You said that Hamas, the group widely reported to have been behind the attack, had no idea it was happening.

What is your source for those claims?
 
Dude, sounds like you're on the wrong team, and you won't be the first or the last. What you see as 'Americans are waking up' is eerily similar to what Harris supporters thought was happening across the country. Thankfully, they were way off, and I'm betting you are too. Did you go to college recently? Just curious, because most radical professors do their damnedest to churn out America-haters. That's why I'm asking.
there is a great awakening.

awakening to the lies of big pharma, the lies of deep state, the corruption of our government.

that's not hating America.
 
Sorry, I warned you. Hate to see anyone go through all that for nothing. Let it be known for anyone reading this that I've made my stance crystal clear in previous comments, and let him know any further attempts for him to get his hate fix from me would be fruitless. I don't know what he's blabbering about now, but I guarantee it's wouldn't do jack to persuade me. I'll copy and paste this message every single time he 'quotes' me on this subject.
spamming violation.
 
I'm relaying information that has been reported, which is that Hamas and Sinwar were behind the 10/7 attack. Yes, those doing some/most/all of the fighting were al Qassam. al Qassam is reported as the military arm of Hamas.

You said that Hamas, the group widely reported to have been behind the attack, had no idea it was happening.

What is your source for those claims?
has been reported?

get the link, bitch.
 
there is a great awakening.

awakening to the lies of big pharma, the lies of deep state, the corruption of our government.
That's a true enough statement, I'm with you here.
that's not hating America.
This is where you slip again. If you're referring to what I call hating America. That was a comment that was literally hating on America. As an example, boy do you have some problems that need fixing, frankly, we all do, but that doesn't mean I hate you.
 
I'm relaying information that has been reported,
You are regurgitating disinformation that has been regurgitated,


which is that Hamas and Sinwar were behind the 10/7 attack.
Simple logic also precludes Hamas from having known about the attack until it happened. Iran funds Al Qassam $100 million annually to do the Ayatollah's bidding and no one else's.

In addition to posting images of Hamas fighters (which I notice you have EVADED) please explain why the Ayatollah would divulge details of a secret plan to anyone outside his group of perpetrators.


al Qassam is reported as the military arm of Hamas.
Disinformation for morons. Iran funds Al Qassam $100 million annually to do the Ayatollah's bidding and no one else's.

I'm still waiting for your images of Hamas fighters and your rationale that the Ayatollah would jeopardize his attack by violating OPSEC.
 
You are regurgitating disinformation that has been regurgitated,



Simple logic also precludes Hamas from having known about the attack until it happened. Iran funds Al Qassam $100 million annually to do the Ayatollah's bidding and no one else's.

In addition to posting images of Hamas fighters (which I notice you have EVADED) please explain why the Ayatollah would divulge details of a secret plan to anyone outside his group of perpetrators.



Disinformation for morons. Iran funds Al Qassam $100 million annually to do the Ayatollah's bidding and no one else's.

I'm still waiting for your images of Hamas fighters and your rationale that the Ayatollah would jeopardize his attack by violating OPSEC.

The US funds Ukraine’s war. That does mean the Ukraine military isn’t the Ukraine military, nor does it mean the US has operational control.

I’ve never said al Qassam isn’t who is primarily doing the fighting.

You are using circular logic. My reporting is disinformation because it contradicts what you are claiming, yet you haven’t provided any support for your claims, so there is no reason to believe them.
 
The US funds Ukraine’s war.
The US gives money for others to determine what to do with it, a huge criticism of We the People.

Iran never gives money for any other purpose than the Ayatollah's bidding.

I’ve never said al Qassam isn’t who is primarily doing the fighting.
Your statements about what you "never said" are always summarily discarded.

Iran is responsible for every attack on Israel since 1979 ... save Saddam Hussein's SCUD missile attacks.
 
The US gives money for others to determine what to do with it, a huge criticism of We the People.

Iran never gives money for any other purpose than the Ayatollah's bidding.


Your statements about what you "never said" are always summarily discarded.

Iran is responsible for every attack on Israel since 1979 ... save Saddam Hussein's SCUD missile attacks.
Until you prove otherwise, every single thing you just said is unsupported speculation.
 
Until you show otherwise, you haven't said anything. Flee! Run to the hills.
Again, you are making various claims that don't align with reported information. If you can't support your claims, why should I believe them?

That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
 
Again, you are making various claims that don't align with reported information.
Translation: I am not regurgitating the same regurgitated disinformation being reported.

You have not posted any images of your Hamas fighters, the implication being you fully understand that you are regurgitating the same regurgitated disinformation being reported.

You have not supported your claims that Iran would jeopardize its secret plans by divulging details to the world. If you can't support your claims, why should any rational adult believe them? That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
 
Translation: I am not regurgitating the same regurgitated disinformation being reported.

You have not posted any images of your Hamas fighters, the implication being you fully understand that you are regurgitating the same regurgitated disinformation being reported.

You have not supported your claims that Iran would jeopardize its secret plans by divulging details to the world. If you can't support your claims, why should any rational adult believe them? That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
For the 3rd time, I'm not disputing that al Qassam were the fighters who executed 10/7.

Here's are the claims I'm asking you to provide support for, with something other than "because I said".

Hamas had no idea 10/7 was going to happen until it was happening.

Al Qassam is not affiliated with Hamas, and Hamas was not involved in the attack.

The US gives money for others to determine what to do with it, a huge criticism of We the People.
 
has been reported?

get the link, bitch.
al Qassam is the military arm of Hamas:


Sinwar behind 10/7:




Any more questions, dickwad?

giphy.gif
 
al Qassam is the military arm of Hamas:
Nope. dismissed. Wheres your explanation as to why any rational adult should believe your contention that Iran would somehow fund a martial force to do the bidding of someone other than the Ayatollah?
 
Nope. dismissed. Wheres your explanation as to why any rational adult should believe your contention that Iran would somehow fund a martial force to do the bidding of someone other than the Ayatollah?
Trying again.... Here are the claims you've not supported:

Hamas had no idea 10/7 was going to happen until it was happening.

Al Qassam is not affiliated with Hamas, and Hamas was not involved in the attack.

Sinwar was not the mastermind behind the attack.
 
Nope. dismissed. Wheres your explanation as to why any rational adult should believe your contention that Iran would somehow fund a martial force to do the bidding of someone other than the Ayatollah?
Imagine, bitching about someone else's comment again without an alternative point of view. Even a simpleton knows how to use Google to at least try to come up with something. I'll keep searching. I'm sure I will eventually come across something that appears to have come from your brilliant mind.
 
Translation: I am not regurgitating the same regurgitated disinformation being reported.

You have not posted any images of your Hamas fighters, the implication being you fully understand that you are regurgitating the same regurgitated disinformation being reported.

You have not supported your claims that Iran would jeopardize its secret plans by divulging details to the world. If you can't support your claims, why should any rational adult believe them? That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
Wow, where have I heard something like this before. You're complaining about someone's comment and look there's no alternative information that anyone could call a coherent idea. I noticed that you complain a lot about people just parroting information. I'm not a fan of that either, but let me tell you, I haven't found any evidence that you do anything but repeat yourself over and over and complain about other people's posts. It's very compelling.
 
Back
Top