Perhaps you were banned because you don’t know the proper use of “who’s” and “whose.”
Best retort I've seen from you, Earl.
Perhaps you were banned because you don’t know the proper use of “who’s” and “whose.”
People always tell me that. They are never able to show how any of my posts are trolling.
As evaluated by YOU?
If people ALWAYS tell you that, perhaps EVERYONE ELSE isn't wrong.
I don't feel like looking back through your post history at the moment, but I don't recall you issuing this challenge to me.
Ah the people fallacy. If 100 special ed students says their teacher is a troll and stupid, it means it's true?
By all means, continue your delusion that you're not the problem.
I rarely threadban people. You're on a very short list, which goes nicely with the bus you rode to school.
I actually did ride the short bus.
BTW, thread bans don't work on me since I just create another thread. It drives posters crazy.
It works as planned. It keeps your trollshit out of my thread when I choose to ban you. You starting another thread is totally irrelevant, to me at least.
Are you familiar with a poster named CharacterAssasin? He was a far bigger shitposting troll than you. He's the only other member that I've consistently banned.
Neither should a debate thread qualify that precludes debate by banning everyone who might not bless your comment.
I remember him.
When I create another thread, I usually make it creative and the posters move there from other thread.
But anyway I find it odd that when I tell the truth or give facts, I get called a troll. Some kind of Dunning-Kruger effect. You exhibit it.
APL thread:
Nice to see a transperson triggering the RWNJs once again
Total posts, 18
Views, 257
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...a-transperson-triggering-the-RWNJs-once-again
Original thread:
Man With Long Hair Crushing Female Competitors at Penn
Total posts, 130
Views, 1237
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...Long-Hair-Crushing-Female-Competitors-at-Penn
I can see your hypocrisy.
There are genuine trolls in your thread and you haven't banned them. Hmm I wonder why?
As I said before, I don't threadban often, and you're on a very short list.
Again, YOUR evaluation of who is and isn't a troll seems to differ from EVERYONE ELSE'S.
You seem to be unaware that some of those posters in your thread are self-described trolls.
But I guess since they're Trumpkins, you give them a pass.
They must have more self awareness (or honesty) than you do.
The moderators make that call, not you, Marty.Neither should a debate thread qualify that precludes debate by banning everyone who might not bless your comment.
Can only be a fearful child's idea. Here is a list of members banned from one of our current threads:
Jarod, evince, moon, domer76, Micawber, guno, reagansghost, Poor Richard Saunders, Cinnabar, gemini104104, Walt, AProudLefty, Dutch Uncle, BartenderElite, Concart, Hawkeye10, martin, Diesel, BidenPresident, Hoosier Daddy, tigerred59 and McRocket
I don't think I exaggerate much when I say that 98% of the responses generated by those people devolve into some version of "orange man bad". After a year of "senile old nazi potato head jackass good" with no evidence to back that up, there's generally nothing to "debate". You want to debate? Try starting a thread about something you think is debate-worthy and only thread ban one person: Donald J. Trump.
So you admit they're trolls and that you're a hypocrite?
No, I'm unaware of who you're talking about. But whoever they are, if they admit to being trolls they have greater self awareness and of honesty than you.