how is reposting my earlier explanation running away?
lol.
What earlier explanation?
I asked Damo to test a theory, btw. You both suffer from the same affliction.
because of his strong ties to the oil industry, which you keep ignoring.
![]()
wrong again onceler. you've made the same statement in other threads. you constantly bring up bush's oil ties and how i supposedly ignore that...as a REASON bush should get more blame than obama.
why can't you just be honest onceler? it is an anonymous board, why be ashamed of your posts?
Do you have articles where the mainstream media "blamed" Bush, or is it just speculation? No doubt, there was much more of the latter with Bush, because of his strong ties to the oil industry, which you keep ignoring. And the fact that his admin doled out huge subsidies to oil, and that the oil industry saw record profits coincidentally under his admin, etc.
If you do have articles that specifically BLAME Bush, I'd be very surprised if they didn't also cite causality for that.
But, keep whining away, Yirked. And hey - why didn't Bush get "Chicago-style politics," but Obama does? Huh? Huh?
wow...someone is pissy for getting called out for bush blame....perhaps you are sensitive because everyone knows you have BDS?
onceler....if that was the ONLY post you ever made about bush's oil ties, you would have a point. the truth is, you have harped on bush's oil ties repeatedly. in dozens of posts.
seriously....what is your problem?
I think how you read my posts IS important. You clearly misread the one above, though you won't admit it.
What makes you think you read the other ones correctly? You didn't. I didn't blame Bush for high oil prices. I have always talked in terms of why there is more speculation that he does. You don't get that, and I think that's important to point out. Because it can get quite tiring.