More Co2 produces more food....which is a HUUUUGE problem for the human extinction movement.
I did not read further.
Why Are Trump Supporters Anti-Science.
- Thread starter Highlight
- Start date
I did not read further.
Sure does. It’s just that you can’t grow anything in a drought or when seawater is encroaching on your cropland.
But, I guess one can rowboat to the nearest supermarket in Florida for all that extra food.
The predictions of sea rise have been wrong for my entire lifetime.
They are going to be right now?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Great non sequiturs. Of course it's great when you can grow everything in great weather and when sea water remains in the ocean, which it always does.
But I guess one can spread peanut butter on a television and watch it dry for all that extra time to kill.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
The ocean level has not risen discernibly since 1890. No rational adult has any reason to believe that the ocean is somehow rising. Irrational adults, however, can obviously believe anything they are ordered to believe.
Most of these moronic fucks we live with cant even imagine the land sinking.....and even those who might are generally too lazy to investigate.
DARK AGES SUCK!
There are areas in Iraq where crops used to be grown that are now invaded by seawater. Consequently, they either starve or move en masse to the cities. We’ve seen mass migration to the US from South America due to drought. It’s an international security issue as well as a human suffering issue.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Sure, much of Earth's coastline is sinking. Everybody is familiar with Venice, Italy, but Pavlopetri is a great example of where Venice is heading.
But I'm talking about the ocean itself. It's not rising to any extent that humans can discern.
The UK's Royal Navy engineers began constructing airstrips on Gan island (an atoll) in August 1941 for the Fleet Air Arm. This is how it appeared at the end of WWII as RAF Gan (highest point of elevation: 6 ft. above sea level)
Today, it is called Gan Airport and this is how it looks, still at six feet above sea level., just as it was when construction began in 1941.
Why let the truth get in the way of a profitable con?Sure, much of Earth's coastline is sinking. Everybody is familiar with Venice, Italy, but Pavlopetri is a great example of where Venice is heading.
But I'm talking about the ocean itself. It's not rising to any extent that humans can discern.
The UK's Royal Navy engineers began constructing airstrips on Gan island (an atoll) in August 1941 for the Fleet Air Arm. This is how it appeared at the end of WWII as RAF Gan (highest point of elevation: 6 ft. above sea level)
Today, it is called Gan Airport and this is how it looks, still at six feet above sea level., just as it was when construction began in 1941.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
thanks, China-virus.
Camus
https://x.com/newstart_2024
@newstart_2024
True science thrives on verification, not just consensus. But a major loophole is undermining trusteer reviewers often never see the raw data.This is especially true for vaccine studies. We’re told to “trust the science,” but the critical data needed to verify that science is locked away.Take the Danish study on vaccine safety. Its conclusions are touted, but its de-identified data is hidden. Independent experts can’t check the work.Even worse? The CDC’s premier database, the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), was moved to a private group to shield it from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.Now, access is controlled. Studies must pass a CDC "clearing process," creating obvious selection bias. Only "policy-friendly" results get published.This isn't science. It's gatekeeping.You can't reproduce results.You can't challenge conclusions.You can only trust.Demanding data isn't denialism. It's the foundation of scientific integrity.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
No, you don't or you wouldn't have opened earlier with the bullshit on nuclear power you did.
I know lots about solar power, far more than you do. Shifting power around, particularly over hundreds of miles, is not simple. It can't be done at the snap of the fingers. As Germany has proven, a "smart grid" doesn't work and is unaffordable.
I've worked distribution systems, you never have, or you wouldn't be saying the utterly stupid stuff you are saying.
You need a stable grid with base loading power that is on continuously, not intermittently or subject to vagaries in the weather. Solar cannot do that.
Solar everywhere it has been heavily installed, has driven the cost of electricity up dramatically. Typically, people in places where it is heavily used see their electric bills triple or quadruple. That's a fact and it is easily provable.
In Germany, critical services and industries that rely on 100% reliable power have gone to installing UPS and diesel generators on their sites to prevent the frequent 'hiccups' solar and wind cause in line voltage. They can't afford to have their power interrupted even for as little as a second or two.
Renewable energy ‘puts Germany at risk of major blackout’
The Berliner Zeitung newspaper reported that the high uptake of solar energy in Germany had increased the chances of an overload and an electricity blackout like the one that hit Spain and Portugal in…brusselssignal.eu
Germany’s green energy dream turns into a NIGHTMARE: economic collapse, environmental failures and geopolitical tensions
Germany’s over reliance on intermittent renewable energy sources like wind and solar has led to an energy crisis, exacerbated by the phenomenon of Dunkelflaute (periods of no wind or sunlight). Electricity prices in Germany are the highest in Europe, reaching €900/MWh during crises, compared to...www.newstarget.com
German spot prices are affected by the higher wind and solar supplies
The German spot price of electricity for Thursday dropped as the wind and solar power supply in Germany is expected to increase,…www.worldenergynews.com
Simpletons, like you, just listen to the envirotards and other Leftists who blithely stammer on about solar and wind when they don't have a fucking clue about how large power distribution systems work. Solar is a disastrous, costly, fail.
Only an idiot wouldn't think that solar energy isn't the way to go. In case you missed it, this picture of the U.S. shows the total area of the U.S. it would take to power the U.S day and night.
Enelgreenpower
enelgreenpower.com › renewable energies › solar energy
Benefits of solar energy | Enel Green Power
National Grid
nationalgrid.com › stories › energy-explained › how-does-solar-power-work
How does solar power work? | National Grid
As if I have the time to waste on an asswipe like you. In post #80 you said a lot of shit. Bring up the one point you think you were the most right about. When I crush it, let that stand as an example of the worth of anything else you had to say.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
At what capacity factor is that done at?Only an idiot wouldn't think that solar energy isn't the way to go. In case you missed it, this picture of the U.S. shows the total area of the U.S. it would take to power the U.S day and night.
View attachment 62109
Enelgreenpower
enelgreenpower.com › renewable energies › solar energy
Benefits of solar energy | Enel Green Power
National Grid
nationalgrid.com › stories › energy-explained › how-does-solar-power-work
How does solar power work? | National Grid
"Capacity factor?" Whatever amount of energy the U.S. uses each year, what I showed would at least match it. That includes coal, oil and nuclear energy. And whatever energy isn't used could be stored by many different means. And what else could you do with all that green energy? How about for areas that need it, convert salt water into fresh water.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
FTFY. Yeah, I know. I do it all the time. Your religion is stupid and particularly easy to debunk.
Nope. I'm happy leaving your religion debunked for the scam that it is. Enjoy!
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Capacity factor. It is used in determining the average time online a plant operates. Nuclear plants run typically about 97 to 98% capacity factors. Most conventional plants like coal, gas turbine, etc., have capacity factors between 80 and 90%. Solar typically runs around 25% capacity factor.
Even the most basic source could have left you better informed.
Capacity factor - Wikipedia
You showed me a hyper-theoretical that bears no semblance to reality.
Converting salt water to fresh isn't a case of just boiling it. Normally, a saltwater to freshwater plant goes through a number of steps. First, you filter out all the sediments and other solids in the water. This typically uses a combination of settling tanks and sand / DE filtration. After that, you have to send the water through an RO system to remove the dissolved solids that filtration can't remove. The process isn't nearly as energy intensive as it is complex and requiring massive filtration systems.
Your continued flippant and vague answers to how things works shows you have no idea how any of this stuff works in any sort of detail.
That capacity factor is why you need, roughly, 5 KW of installed solar capacity to get 1 KWD (kilowatt day) of power, along with 3+ KWH of installed battery capacity. The combination drives the cost of a solar plant to astronomical levels that cannot be afforded.
serendipity
Verified User
That's Dumber 69 always been the same, he's a fucking numbskull. Used to engage the cunt but found out that he's just an ignorant twat and truly a complete waste of time.