Why current conservatism is NOT good for you.

try to have a point.

Are these enough? lol

Lsudn65.jpg
 
No doubt. It'll be on the same day that your eyes and mind open up and you start voting for candidates that really work for the people -- the Dems. :laugh:

"The people" is codeword for that they're commies. You know, like "The Peoples' Republic" of China; Which is NOT a republic by any classic

definition. They are the first and foremost commies in the world today, even.

"The people", "Workers" - Karl Marx

Karl Marx never did a day of honest work in his life, that POS.
 
"The people" is codeword for that they're commies. You know, like "The Peoples' Republic" of China; Which is NOT a republic by any classic

definition. They are the first and foremost commies in the world today, even.

"The people", "Workers" - Karl Marx

Karl Marx never did a day of honest work in his life, that POS.

Yes, I'm sure it's "code." :rolleyes:
 
Not a proof. Try again.

It is better than anything you have failed to present. You have no evidence to the contrary. See the reports from the individual police agencies if you are actually interested in facts.

Injuring police officers, some of whom still have not returned to work, doesn't fit your delusion that it was not a violent riot.
 
No im not, globalist word mangler, who can't take the heat for his stupid internationalist fascist beliefs.

libertarians are cowardly corporate pole smokers.
Discard of logic. Insult fallacies. Redefinition fallacies (globalist<->language, fascist<->corporation, fascism<->international trade, libertarian<->corporation).

You obviously are not paying attention. I am not libertarian. Inversion fallacy. Word games.
 
Discard of logic. Insult fallacies. Redefinition fallacies (globalist<->language, fascist<->corporation, fascism<->international trade, libertarian<->corporation).

You obviously are not paying attention. I am not libertarian. Inversion fallacy. Word games.

made up fallacies. no argument presented.
 
It is better than anything you have failed to present.
I am not trying to make your argument, dumbass.
You have no evidence to the contrary.
Attempted force of negative proof fallacy.
See the reports from the individual police agencies if you are actually interested in facts.
Learn what 'fact' means. It does NOT mean 'proof' or 'Universal Truth'.
Injuring police officers, some of whom still have not returned to work, doesn't fit your delusion that it was not a violent riot.
I never said it wasn't a violent riot.
 
I never said it wasn't a violent riot.

Good to hear. Some of your fellow JPP MAGA posters think it was a "peaceful protest" or regular tourist day.

In a violent riot with Trump supporters attacking police, it is obvious some of those officers were injured. Quibbling over the exact number is just diversion from reality.
 
Good to hear. Some of your fellow JPP MAGA posters think it was a "peaceful protest" or regular tourist day.
You are hallucinating.
In a violent riot with Trump supporters attacking police,
Trump supporters weren't attacking police. They were helping to defend the police.
it is obvious some of those officers were injured.
Not seriously.
Quibbling over the exact number is just diversion from reality.
I am not quibbling over the number of police attacked or injured.
 
Back
Top