Why did no Republican candidates attack trump for talking about his genital size?

Because this thread has a topic, and your trying to ask questions about other topics is not the topic for this thread. Go make your own thread, but you're dodging the topic.

we've got a perfectly good thread right here that no one is using.......why start another?......your topic has been dead meat since August, 2016.......
 
A lot of Republican candidates for president were on stage when trump brought up the size of his genitals, saying he had no problem about that.

Why didn't one of the other candidates attack him immediately for violating the dignity of the office and the debate? Instead they all did not, and he 'won' the point.

About the best thing I can say for this OP is that you didn't put it in 'Current Events'.
 
A lot of Republican candidates for president were on stage when trump brought up the size of his genitals, saying he had no problem about that.

Why didn't one of the other candidates attack him immediately for violating the dignity of the office and the debate? Instead they all did not, and he 'won' the point.

Trump was followed by many because he threw all the rules out the window. So Trump using unpresidential and immature language follows perfectly. His tweeting like a teenager is fine.His pissing off our allies is OK. Trump was childish in the debates and his fans were happy. Trump does not respect the office. I guess his voters do not either. Must be some kind of anarchist bent driving them.
 
Wrong. Republicans not holding him accountable for it helped him.

Who was going to hold him accountable? People already losing to him? Do you have any names? What exactly would this person say that would make people supporting Trump switch over to them?
 
Who was going to hold him accountable? People already losing to him? Do you have any names? What exactly would this person say that would make people supporting Trump switch over to them?

You know the names of the top candidates, and I already posted what they should have said in the OP. They could say things like 'can you imagine Ronald Reagan discussing the size of his genitals in a presidential debate? He respected the dignity of the office.'
 
You know the names of the top candidates, and I already posted what they should have said in the OP. They could say things like 'can you imagine Ronald Reagan discussing the size of his genitals in a presidential debate? He respected the dignity of the office.'
And you think that would have turned off all the Trump supporting voters?

If so I don't think you followed the primary very closely
 
And you think that would have turned off all the Trump supporting voters?

If so I don't think you followed the primary very closely

Yes, I think it would have changed every trump voter's vote. That's what I said. Why do I bother responding to you? You seem like a good troll who might not even realize you are one.

It would have done what I said.
 
You know the names of the top candidates, and I already posted what they should have said in the OP. They could say things like 'can you imagine Ronald Reagan discussing the size of his genitals in a presidential debate? He respected the dignity of the office.'

did you complain when Hilliary talked about the size of HER testicles?......
 
A lot of Republican candidates for president were on stage when trump brought up the size of his genitals, saying he had no problem about that.

Why didn't one of the other candidates attack him immediately for violating the dignity of the office and the debate? Instead they all did not, and he 'won' the point.

Because they have the same size, some even less.
 
Yes, I think it would have changed every trump voter's vote. That's what I said. Why do I bother responding to you? You seem like a good troll who might not even realize you are one.

It would have done what I said.

LOL, Craig you're full of shit. Republican candidates all along said he wasn't fit for office and it didn't matter. You clearly don't understand the mood of the electorate at the time and what propelled Trump.

Look at all he's said and done today and he still has his base of support. The comment you are focusing on is far down the list of bad things he's said.

So either you are trolling or don't understand politics all that well
 
LOL, Craig you're full of shit. Republican candidates all along said he wasn't fit for office and it didn't matter. You clearly don't understand the mood of the electorate at the time and what propelled Trump.

Look at all he's said and done today and he still has his base of support. The comment you are focusing on is far down the list of bad things he's said.

So either you are trolling or don't understand politics all that well

You're clueless. And a trump enabler. Some candidates calling him unfit later isn't nearly as effective as calling him on the behavior then. They just let him get away with it. And they lost.
 
You're clueless. And a trump enabler. Some candidates calling him unfit later isn't nearly as effective as calling him on the behavior then. They just let him get away with it. And they lost.

El Oh F'ing El. I did not vote for Trump. I wanted him to lose. I watched the primaries and how often they called Trump out. I understand as a socialist free market Republicans are anathema to you but it's on you if you choose not to understand why voters picked Trump and refuse to understand it. Why not ask those on this board who voted for Trump if it would have changed their minds instead of just assuming so.
 
El Oh F'ing El. I did not vote for Trump. I wanted him to lose. I watched the primaries and how often they called Trump out. I understand as a socialist free market Republicans are anathema to you but it's on you if you choose not to understand why voters picked Trump and refuse to understand it. Why not ask those on this board who voted for Trump if it would have changed their minds instead of just assuming so.

You're just showing my point that you are clueless.

I didn't say you voted for trump or wanted him to win. I said you are clueless and a trump enabler. You then don't understand the different impact it would have then rather than now that trump has been president for a year. He was far more vulnerable then.

Regardless of the issue of how people voted, I also said it would have defended the dignity of the office and the debates.

They didn't do it. And they paid the price. And you are defending their not doing it. Making you a trump enabler.
 
You're just showing my point that you are clueless.

I didn't say you voted for trump or wanted him to win. I said you are clueless and a trump enabler. You then don't understand the different impact it would have then rather than now that trump has been president for a year. He was far more vulnerable then.

Regardless of the issue of how people voted, I also said it would have defended the dignity of the office and the debates.

They didn't do it. And they paid the price. And you are defending their not doing it. Making you a trump enabler.

OMG. Dude, Rubio, Bush, Kasich all said he was unfit for office.

And you're contradicting yourself by claiming he wouldn't be President to regardless of how they voted. (Not to mention Rubio apologized for his comments in the debate).

You have a board full of Trump voters. Ask them, instead of assuming, if they would have changed their votes.
 
Of course. Not just a pun, but we all know what a person being a dick is, and Trump exemplifies it. He yells ,swears at and berates his staff. His maturity level explains his tweeting. Still the worlds oldest teenager. Name calling and low grade insults are so dicky. He has brought the office down to a level never reached before. We have had bad presidents before, but they did not harm the office like Daffy Donald has. The dignity will be difficult to get back. Maybe President Warren can elevate it again. An intelligent well spoken person who speaks in facts will be a welcome change.
 
Back
Top