Why do libs obsess over "assault rifles" when handgun deaths are so much more common?

Nordberg said:
Proving what? That semi automatic rifles and not used? You are quibbling. Address the point. These ARs should not be in the hands of civilians. They are anti personnel weapons designed for war. They are designed to spray bullets. That is not exactly what people need to defend their homes. Killers are using them to do wht they are supposed to. Kill a lot of people in a short time. We are all less safe with their proliferation.
Click to expand...

According to JD that fucktard, CFM is missing what I'm saying anyway. No mass shootings were done with just a basic hand gun, or two, alone. There is always mass ammunition, body armor, or another thing we are discussing outside of basic hand guns. A simple thing occurs that CFM doesn't get. What is being called basic hand guns being used, isn't basic at all, when you add all the extras.
 
Nordberg said:
Proving what? That semi automatic rifles and not used? You are quibbling. Address the point. These ARs should not be in the hands of civilians. They are anti personnel weapons designed for war. They are designed to spray bullets. That is not exactly what people need to defend their homes. Killers are using them to do wht they are supposed to. Kill a lot of people in a short time. We are all less safe with their proliferation.
Click to expand...

If we are less safe why is our murder rate decreasing?
 
Jade Dragon said:
According to JD that fucktard, CFM is missing what I'm saying anyway. No mass shootings were done with just a basic hand gun, or two, alone. There is always mass ammunition, body armor, or another thing we are discussing outside of basic hand guns. A simple thing occurs that CFM doesn't get. What is being called basic hand guns being used, isn't basic at all, when you add all the extras.
Click to expand...

Why the childish name calling? are you OK? Should we take your guns away because of your immaturity and anger issues? I think so. Of course yopu gun molesters must know the Supreme Court allowed a 4th district court of appeals ruling stand that permitted Maryland to prohibit assault weapons and large capacity magazines. I am suer you know that. You are such an immature gun lover, that you must have done SOOOMMME homework.,
 
Nordberg said:
Proving what? That semi automatic rifles and not used? You are quibbling. Address the point. These ARs should not be in the hands of civilians. They are anti personnel weapons designed for war. They are designed to spray bullets. That is not exactly what people need to defend their homes. Killers are using them to do wht they are supposed to. Kill a lot of people in a short time. We are all less safe with their proliferation.
Click to expand...

Proving his statement was 100% false. I address his false statement and all you want to do is pucker up to his asshole defending a liar.

I have FOUR AR-15 rifles. Care to try and take just one of them? If, as you claim, they make things less safe, shouldn't you man up and try to personally get as many gone as you possible can?
 
Jade Dragon said:
According to JD that fucktard, CFM is missing what I'm saying anyway. No mass shootings were done with just a basic hand gun, or two, alone. There is always mass ammunition, body armor, or another thing we are discussing outside of basic hand guns. A simple thing occurs that CFM doesn't get. What is being called basic hand guns being used, isn't basic at all, when you add all the extras.
Click to expand...

That nonsense if called trying to cover for your dumbass and incorrect claim about handguns and mass shooting.

Are you actually claiming that is someone uses the ammo designed for that gun it's no longer a basic handgun? If you are, you're yet another leftwing retard.

However, as soon as you're man enough to try and take from me the ones I own, step up. You can bring Nordberg with you. He say I shouldn't own any. Good luck. He's a pussy just like you.
 
Boris The Animal said:
Wonder if Nordberg the Communist knows history. Knows that the Nazis and Soviets disarmed their citizenry and look what happened.
Click to expand...

Oppressive governments (even in feudal times) have been keeping the populace disarmed as far back as when "arms" were knives, swords and spears. And in modern times, step one to disarming the populace has been universal registration. (England and Australia come to mind) Background checks are fine. Registration is cause for concern. Once someone proves that they are not a threat, that should be the end of government involvement.
 
CFM said:
Proving his statement was 100% false. I address his false statement and all you want to do is pucker up to his asshole defending a liar.

I have FOUR AR-15 rifles. Care to try and take just one of them? If, as you claim, they make things less safe, shouldn't you man up and try to personally get as many gone as you possible can?
Click to expand...

You should not have any weapons. If you feel unsafe and think .wrongly, that a gun will make you safer, you don't need to talk about it. But you talk about your arsenal regularly. They define who you are and it is ugly. You are defiant and dare anyone to take them away. Do you have problems with people trying to take your guns away/?if so, that is quite unusual. But you are your guns and that is sad.
 
Last edited:
Sirthinksalot said:
A) It is significantly more likely to happen with a disarmed populace.

B) Did the German people expect to be taken over by Hitler?
Click to expand...


Do the people have a right to bear shoulder-launched antiaircraft missiles? Because they're going to need them when the dictator makes his move!

As for Germany, the people elected Hitler, albeit with a minority vote.
 
Nordberg said:
You should not have any weapons. If you feel unsafe and think .wrongly, that a gun will make you safer, you don't need to talk about it. But you talk about your arsenal regularly. They define who you are and it is ugly. You are defiant and dare anyone to take them away. Do you have problems with people trying to take your guns away/?if so, that is quite unusual. But you rer your guns and that is sad.
Click to expand...

Now, who the flying fuck are you to dictate what we can and cannot have? You prove once again that the Left is totalitarian by nature!!!
 
Tranquillus in Exile said:
Do the people have a right to bear shoulder-launched antiaircraft missiles? Because they're going to need them when the dictator makes his move!

As for Germany, the people elected Hitler, albeit with a minority vote.
Click to expand...

Yes, we do indeed have such a right. As I likely told you before, read up on the Constitution a bit.
 
Boris The Animal said:
Now, who the flying fuck are you to dictate what we can and cannot have? You prove once again that the Left is totalitarian by nature!!!
Click to expand...

Another aggressive gun idiot who cannot follow a discussion. Yeah, you would love to shoot me for thinking guns appeal; to the lowest common denominator. But, how quickly you posters prove me right. But you can sleep well. There is nobody taklng your guns away. Although it is obvious that someone should.
 
Sirthinksalot said:
It is well established that so called assault rifles are used in far fewer murders than hand guns. Why the obsession with "assault rifles"? Is it because they look scary? Or because mass shootings generate headlines and captivate public interest? Or most sadly, because you think a bunch of dead children is most useful to score cheap political points?



https://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/09/...pon-myth.html?referer=https://www.google.com/
Click to expand...

So exactly how many school kids ( and people in general) have to get killed by these things before NRA flunkies realize that the almighty dollar just isn't worth it?
 
Nordberg said:
Total bullshit. And we have no mass shooters using them.
Click to expand...

You don't think I could? How do you know that? Have you ever seen me shoot my black powder handguns?
You know nothing of firearms to make a uninformed statement, much less on my skills with a black powder handgun.
They use sporting rifles because you liberals keep them in the spotlight.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top