Why do the racist MI protesters need to be armed?

So you admit Lincoln wanted war. And thats right as he required revenue and raw materials.
The south didnt want war.
The north didnt want war.
The north didnt care about slavery.
The north didnt care about the south going their own way.
Lincoln wanted blood and wouldnt stop till he got it.

Who fired the first shot?At Ft Sumter?
 
It guess it is just your hate, then. Judgmental, intolerant, self-righteous. Because you don't agree with their views or (legal) actions does not make you better or smarter than them.

Another absurd suggestion on your part. Am I smarter than idiots parading around with guns, Confederate and Don’t Tread On Me flags on their beat up pickups, in close proximity to each other at a supposedly anti-lockdown rally? Unmasked? You bet your sweet ass I am!
 
Another absurd suggestion on your part. Am I smarter than idiots parading around with guns, Confederate and Don’t Tread On Me flags on their beat up pickups, in close proximity to each other? Unmasked? You bet your sweet ass I am!

Lets run a poll on that, dickhead. I doubt you'd get many votes that you are...
 
The states that left,left because they feared irrationally that Lincoln would end slavery.
No slavery no Civil War

Yeah....just document your ad hominem opinionated truth. Just like all leftists you have the power to know what people thought....(thought police)…..even 150 years removed.

The point? When a leftist cannot actually present evidence that can be objectively reproduced and documented...…..THEY MAKE SHIT UP, as exampled.

Just enlighten us...how do you know what people thought 150 years ago void of those thoughts being historically recorded such as the evidence that I presented that demonstrated that slavery existed legally...even in the north 4 years after the civil war began. Maryland "must not" have had those FEARS you propagandized about...no? Nor did the Western part of Va. (now called WV)….

I luv winding a left winger up with facts and watch as they come spinning out of the corner with ad hominem BULLSHIT. Popcorn?(:


That must be why Margots (supposed) diary was never found...…...She forgot to document her thoughts and just pretended to one up her sister Anne....(are all jews jealous of others and seek accolade even if they have to make shit up?):bigthink:
 
Yeah....just document your ad hominem opinionated truth. Just like all leftists you have the power to know what people thought....(thought police)…..even 150 years removed.

The point? When a leftist cannot actually present evidence that can be objectively reproduced and documented...…..THEY MAKE SHIT UP, as exampled.

Just enlighten us...how do you know what people thought 150 years ago void of those thoughts being historically recorded such as the evidence that I presented that demonstrated that slavery existed legally...even in the north 4 years after the civil war began. Maryland "must not" have had those FEARS you propagandized about...no? Nor did the Western part of Va. (now called WV)….

I luv winding a left winger up with facts and watch as they come spinning out of the corner with ad hominem BULLSHIT. Popcorn?(:


That must be why Margots (supposed) diary was never found...…...She forgot to document her thoughts and just pretended to one up her sister Anne....(are all jews jealous of others and seek accolade even if they have to make shit up?):bigthink:

Ever read a fucking history book moron.
Or all your education from Fox News!
 
That seems very unlikely, especially since after the war was over, the Union did exactly what the South accused them of doing. Even today, we don't really have states' rights as much as we used to.

The Union should have hanged each and every Confederate of treason,starting with RE Lee!
Resettled the South with Northern Farmers and freed slaves.
 
States Rights the bull shit excuse to keep a third of the Souths citizens in forced slavery

Like I mentioned earlier, slavery was already on its way out during the time due to industrialization, as well as being hugely unpopular since the start.
The Union could have bought the slaves, set them free, and that would have been the end of it.
 
Like I mentioned earlier, slavery was already on its way out during the time due to industrialization, as well as being hugely unpopular since the start.
The Union could have bought the slaves, set them free, and that would have been the end of it.

That's a bull shit assumption!
Slaves weren't going anywhere for decades at best!
 
Back
Top