Why does the left consistently protect pedophiles?

[Diogenes]

In July 2023 it was reported that Jimmy Savile's victims turned their anger on Sir Keir Starmer over a leftists' refusal to prosecute the notorious serial pedophile.

In 2009, child rapist, Jimmy Savile was interviewed by police in Surrey and Sussex.

Subsequently, the police referred 4 cases to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPs) with evidence that Savile had raped at least three learning-disabled girls under the age of 16.

The CPS refused to prosecute Savile, and dropped the claim, citing 'insufficient evidence'.

After Savile's death, and despite multiple attempts at high-level cover ups, he abused at least 500 known victims over a four decade period.

The lefty in charge of the CPS at the time - the man that decided that there was 'insufficient evidence' to charge Saville - is now the 'leader' of the UK Labour government Party and the Prime Minister.

'Sir' Keir Starmer.

WHY DO LEFTIES PROTECT PEDOPHILES?

 

[christiefan915]

In July 2023 it was reported that Jimmy Savile's victims turned their anger on Sir Keir Starmer over a leftists' refusal to prosecute the notorious serial pedophile.

In 2009, child rapist, Jimmy Savile was interviewed by police in Surrey and Sussex.

Subsequently, the police referred 4 cases to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPs) with evidence that Savile had raped at least three learning-disabled girls under the age of 16.

The CPS refused to prosecute Savile, and dropped the claim, citing 'insufficient evidence'.

After Savile's death, and despite multiple attempts at high-level cover ups, he abused at least 500 known victims over a four decade period.

The lefty in charge of the CPS at the time - the man that decided that there was 'insufficient evidence' to charge Saville - is now the 'leader' of the UK Labour government Party and the Prime Minister.

'Sir' Keir Starmer.


WHY DO LEFTIES PROTECT PEDOPHILES?

You're just lying, dummy.

Post in thread 'The media wants Biden out so that.....'

Jul 12, 2024

Sorry that's just a whitewash, Emily Thornberry said as much and she was Labour Attorney General.

Keir Starmer-led CPS let down Jimmy Savile's victims, said Emily Thornberry

Shadow attorney general allies insist she was not personally criticising Labour leader as comments she made at time resurface

www.telegraph.co.uk

Leaving Starmer out of it, do you agree that Savile got away with his crimes for decades because of law enforcement failures?

• christiefan915

C

Thread 'Why so many sexual harassment cases in US, not UK?'

Nov 30, 2017

There are huge differences between UK and US media law - does this explain why more Americans are being accused of sexual harassment? On 5 October, Harvey Weinstein was accused of sexual abuse and the dam broke. Since then, dozens of well-known Americans have been accused of sexual misconduct of some kind. This isn't drip-drip. It's a flood. The list includes film stars such as Kevin Spacey, politicians such as Roy Moore, and journalists such as Mark Halperin.

The deluge of allegations swelled this week, engulfing big media names. While people in other countries have also been...

• cancel2 2022
• Replies: 16
• Forum: Current Events Forum

C

Thread 'Give suspects in rape cases anonymity to prevent the innocent becoming 'stigmatised','

Feb 19, 2013

The identities of men accused of rape and other sex crimes should be kept secret unless they are found guilty in court, a leading lawyer said yesterday.
Maura McGowan, a deputy High Court judge and chief of the professional body for barristers, said the law should protect the identity of those charged with sex offences because the crimes ‘carry such a stigma’.

‘Until they have been proven to have done something as awful as this – I think there is a strong argument in cases of this sort, because they carry such stigma with them, to maintain the defendant’s anonymity, until he is...

• cancel2 2022
• Replies: 53
• Forum: Current Events Forum

 

[Hawkeye10]

Another thing too.....as this decision was made to destroy the American culture and to rebrand Marxism in the West the Soviets were highly involved.

 

[Diogenes]

You're just lying, dummy.

Am I?

 

[Diogenes]

During the period when the grooming gang scandals in the UK came to public attention, particularly around the early 2010s, the head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) was Keir Starmer. He served as the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) from 2008 to 2013.


@Grok

 

[Diogenes]

Keir Starmer was the head of the CPS from 2008 to 2013. During this time, the CPS decided not to prosecute Jimmy Savile in 2009 over allegations of sexual assault on the grounds of insufficient evidence.


@Grok

 

[Diogenes]

Civil servants blocked compensation plans for grooming gang victims.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1876026447028187324

 

[christiefan915]

Am I?

Yes. You claimed that "lefties" protected pedos and ignored that righties do the same. How liberal do you think the Catholic church is anyway?

 

[Diogenes]

You claimed that "lefties" protected pedos and ignored that righties do the same.

Did I?

 

[christiefan915]

Did I?

Already forget your marquee?

 

[christiefan915]

I see moon as being part of it. You know, goat fucker, and worse if you get my drift...

Looking for a vacation?

 

[Diogenes]

Already forget your marquee?

Have I?

 

[christiefan915]

Have I?

FCOL turn off Grok already.

 

[Diogenes]

FCOL turn off Grok already.

Asking "Why does the left consistently protect pedophiles?" does not inherently mean that you excuse the right.

In conclusion, questioning why one side might "protect" pedophiles could be seen as an attempt to highlight perceived hypocrisy or to engage in political debate, but it does not inherently excuse similar or different behaviors on the right. Instead, it should prompt a nuanced discussion about how both political sides handle allegations of abuse, how they legislate on child protection, and the ethical lines they draw in public discourse.

For further reading or context, consider looking into discussions on political rhetoric around child protection, particularly how terms like "grooming" have been politicized in recent years.


@Grok

 

[christiefan915]

Asking "Why does the left consistently protect pedophiles?" does not inherently mean that you excuse the right.

In conclusion, questioning why one side might "protect" pedophiles could be seen as an attempt to highlight perceived hypocrisy or to engage in political debate, but it does not inherently excuse similar or different behaviors on the right. Instead, it should prompt a nuanced discussion about how both political sides handle allegations of abuse, how they legislate on child protection, and the ethical lines they draw in public discourse.

For further reading or context, consider looking into discussions on political rhetoric around child protection, particularly how terms like "grooming" have been politicized in recent years.


@Grok

 

[Diogenes]

View attachment 39505

 

[christiefan915]

What is this up arrow-down arrow business on the posts?

 

[Diogenes]

What is this up arrow-down arrow business on the posts?

It's how I downvote your posts, dear.

 

[Hawkeye10]

The problem with class based marxism in America is that it turns out that people in the lower classes tend to want to move up, they dont want to destroy the upper classes.....this is especially true when the class divides are based upon merit.

Race on the other hand cant be changed.

 

[Diogenes]

 

[Hawkeye10]

What is this up arrow-down arrow business on the posts?

One might expect to be able to go to announcements to find out........but no.