Why does the left consistently protect pedophiles?

[Diogenes]

In July 2023 it was reported that Jimmy Savile's victims turned their anger on Sir Keir Starmer over a leftists' refusal to prosecute the notorious serial pedophile.

In 2009, child rapist, Jimmy Savile was interviewed by police in Surrey and Sussex.

Subsequently, the police referred 4 cases to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPs) with evidence that Savile had raped at least three learning-disabled girls under the age of 16.

The CPS refused to prosecute Savile, and dropped the claim, citing 'insufficient evidence'.

After Savile's death, and despite multiple attempts at high-level cover ups, he abused at least 500 known victims over a four decade period.

The lefty in charge of the CPS at the time - the man that decided that there was 'insufficient evidence' to charge Saville - is now the 'leader' of the UK Labour government Party and the Prime Minister.

'Sir' Keir Starmer.

WHY DO LEFTIES PROTECT PEDOPHILES?

 

[Hawkeye10]

As you look at all the shit that is going on in Britain, for instance jail sentences longer for social media posts the government does not like then for murder, remember that it has long been claimed that what happens there tends to come here in just a few years.

 

[Hawkeye10]

In July 2023 it was reported that Jimmy Savile's victims turned their anger on Sir Keir Starmer over a leftists' refusal to prosecute the notorious serial pedophile.

In 2009, child rapist, Jimmy Savile was interviewed by police in Surrey and Sussex.

Subsequently, the police referred 4 cases to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPs) with evidence that Savile had raped at least three learning-disabled girls under the age of 16.

The CPS refused to prosecute Savile, and dropped the claim, citing 'insufficient evidence'.

After Savile's death, and despite multiple attempts at high-level cover ups, he abused at least 500 known victims over a four decade period.

The lefty in charge of the CPS at the time - the man that decided that there was 'insufficient evidence' to charge Saville - is now the 'leader' of the UK Labour government Party and the Prime Minister.

'Sir' Keir Starmer.

WHY DO LEFTIES PROTECT PEDOPHILES?

The bigger problem is that so-called leaders who land somewhere on the scale of unimpressive to Evil includes just about the entire EU leadership class.

 

[Diogenes]

“The true measure of any society can be found in how it treats its most vulnerable members.”​

 

[Diogenes]

​

 

[Tbird19482]

In July 2023 it was reported that Jimmy Savile's victims turned their anger on Sir Keir Starmer over a leftists' refusal to prosecute the notorious serial pedophile.

In 2009, child rapist, Jimmy Savile was interviewed by police in Surrey and Sussex.

Subsequently, the police referred 4 cases to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPs) with evidence that Savile had raped at least three learning-disabled girls under the age of 16.

The CPS refused to prosecute Savile, and dropped the claim, citing 'insufficient evidence'.

After Savile's death, and despite multiple attempts at high-level cover ups, he abused at least 500 known victims over a four decade period.

The lefty in charge of the CPS at the time - the man that decided that there was 'insufficient evidence' to charge Saville - is now the 'leader' of the UK Labour government Party and the Prime Minister.

'Sir' Keir Starmer.

WHY DO LEFTIES PROTECT PEDOPHILES?

Maybe it is so we have Conservatives and MAGA around to argue with.
Don't want all of them in jail.

 

[Diogenes]

Maybe it is so we have Conservatives and MAGA around to argue with.
Don't want all of them in jail.

What are you suggesting?

 

[Tbird19482]

What are you suggesting?

Read the news, there are a lot of MAGAS in the news for doing things to kids.

 

[Diogenes]

Read the news, there are a lot of MAGAS in the news for doing things to kids.

Are there?

Does the right consistently protect pedophiles politically?

 

[Diogenes]

Maybe it is so we have Conservatives and MAGA around to argue with.
Don't want all of them in jail.

In case you try to plead ignorance later:


12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles about the subject, or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc. or in regard to political public figures. (examples, video of Biden with children in the Senate, Trump images with his daughter in his lap, etc. stuff like that. If the political figure is a member of this board, you cannot bring it here though...) We especially DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another member and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of underage children of any members being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, members being accused of pedophilia, suggesting members may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.

Thread 'Rules of the Board!'

Jul 22, 2006

This site uses user driven content, each user is responsible for the content and opinions in their posts. The owners of the site JPPolitics LLC do not necessarily share the opinions of the author of any post on the forums. This forum was created for Political commentary, News, Education, and entertainment purposes. Please read the rules carefully before posting on the forums.

General Forum Rules
(These rules apply to the entire site)

1. No posting private information without consent. We will delete the posts and you will likely not have access for at least a couple...

• Generic
• Replies: 0
• Forum: Rules

 

[Tbird19482]

In case you try to plead ignorance later:


12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles about the subject, or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc. or in regard to political public figures. (examples, video of Biden with children in the Senate, Trump images with his daughter in his lap, etc. stuff like that. If the political figure is a member of this board, you cannot bring it here though...) We especially DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another member and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of underage children of any members being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, members being accused of pedophilia, suggesting members may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.

Thread 'Rules of the Board!'

Jul 22, 2006

This site uses user driven content, each user is responsible for the content and opinions in their posts. The owners of the site JPPolitics LLC do not necessarily share the opinions of the author of any post on the forums. This forum was created for Political commentary, News, Education, and entertainment purposes. Please read the rules carefully before posting on the forums.

General Forum Rules
(These rules apply to the entire site)

1. No posting private information without consent. We will delete the posts and you will likely not have access for at least a couple...

• Generic
• Replies: 0
• Forum: Rules

it is your thread on pedophiles, and what do pedophiles do, pray on young kids,
Mayby you should report yourself for starting the thread.

 

[Diogenes]

it is your thread on pedophiles, and what do pedophiles do, pray on young kids, Mayby you should report yourself for starting the thread.

You seem to be laboring under a misapprehension.

My thread is regarding news articles about the subject, and a mature discussion involving stats, how it affects people etc. in regard to political public figures.

Watch your step, and tread carefully. If Y O U approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.

 

[Diogenes]

LEFTIST. MUSLIM. ANY QUESTIONS?​

 

[Diogenes]

 

[Diogenes]

 

[Diogenes]

I remember being asked by a detective whether I had “consented” to sexual activity at any point.

I was five years old when my abuse started.

Not a “young woman”.

Not a “child prostitute”.

Not “promiscuous”.

I was a child. So no, I didn’t consent. No child can.

Samantha Smith

https://x.com/SamanthaTaghoy

https://twitter.com/x/status/1875564413761286289

 

[IBDaMann]

Why does the left consistently protect pedophiles?​

Leftists hate human life, especially children. Any children that fall through the cracks and are somehow not aborted, leftists try to get them unalived either in a compulsory defenselessness zone or try to traumatize their lives through pedophiles. Pedophiles wouldn't be so willing to support leftist efforts to have all children sexually assaulted if the pedophiles didn't receive guarantees of protection and immunity.

Of course, children who manage to survive the left's assault through to adulthood, will have to face the left's onslaught of violent criminal attacks without any ability to defend themselves as the 2nd Amendment is quashed more often than a nerd's attempt to fuck the head cheerleader.

 

[Diogenes]

Britain now stands shamed before the world.

The public’s suppressed wrath is bubbling to the surface in petitions, calls for a public inquiry, and demands for accountability.

The scandal is already reshaping British politics.

It’s not just about the heinous nature of the crimes.

It’s that every level of the British system is implicated in the cover-up.

Social workers were intimidated into silence.

Local police ignored, excused, and even abetted pedophile rapists across dozens of cities.

Senior police and Home Office officials deliberately avoided action in the name of maintaining what they called “community relations.”

Local councilors and Members of Parliament rejected pleas for help from the parents of raped children.

Charities, NGOs, and Labour MPs accused those who discussed the scandal of racism and Islamophobia.

The media mostly ignored or downplayed the biggest story of their lifetimes.

Zealous in their incuriosity, much of Britain’s media elite remained barnacled to the bubble of Westminster politics and its self-serving priorities.

They did this to defend a failed model of multiculturalism, and to avoid asking hard questions about failures of immigration policy and assimilation.

They did this because they were afraid of being called racist or Islamophobic.

They did this because Britain’s traditional class snobbery had fused with the new snobbery of political correctness.

All of which is why no one knows precisely how many thousands of young girls were raped in how many towns across Britain since the 1970s.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1876065403874492881

 

[Diogenes]

Leftists hate human life, especially children. Any children that fall through the cracks and are somehow not aborted, leftists try to get them unalived either in a compulsory defenselessness zone or try to traumatize their lives through pedophiles. Pedophiles wouldn't be so willing to support leftist efforts to have all children sexually assaulted if the pedophiles didn't receive guarantees of protection and immunity.

Of course, children who manage to survive the left's assault through to adulthood, will have to face the left's onslaught of violent criminal attacks without any ability to defend themselves as the 2nd Amendment is quashed more often than a nerd's attempt to fuck the head cheerleader.

I suspect that you're correct.

It ain't just the UK, either.

We have all seen what Joe Biden did to little girls IN PUBLIC. IN FRONT OF TV CAMERAS.

The left defends him. Joe knew they would.

 

[Hawkeye10]

Frank Furedi

@Furedibyte

Racial Vengeance Is Given A Free Pass In Grooming Gang Britain, by
@Furedibyte
https://open.substack.com/pub/frankfuredi/p/racial-vengeance-is-given-a-free?r=lrdfg&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true… That the rapist-gangs happen to be mainly Pakistani, and their victims white is not an accident. Why? Because these men are not simply motivated by misogyny nor just sexual domination but also by racial vengeance. Indeed, the most distinct feature of the phenomenon of the grooming gangs is its racial dimension. Anyone who is interested in understanding the socio-cultural dynamic at play should listen to the dehumanised language used by members of these gangs and their friends when they discuss the ‘white sluts’ who they dominate.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1875452884629823593

 

[Hawkeye10]

Dumb does not get much worse than inviting into your country or home large numbers of people who hate you.