Why don't america haters (liberals) ever blame iran for "Escalating?"

Doesn't matter what you want, this is how it is. If it's not us, it'll be china, or any powerful country. It's been this way since the dawn of time. If you have the power, you don't have to listen to people that don't, and the times you do, you only will do so as long as it benefits you in other ways.
Indeed.

There will always be wars and rumors of wars.
 
And you are EASILY the best moderator on this site. Your posts show you have intellect and logic, something that is SEVERELY lacking in the posts of the other mods on here.

i literally do nothing different than any other mod. we are all very congruent. in fact, many think we are the same person
 
But we can be a powerful country and still be on good terms with other countries. Isn't that more beneficial to us? Look at how North Korea and Russia have isolated themselves. It has only made their countries even worse.

well now that we are putting on our serious hats, I would say it depends. I don't mind working with other nations so long as they know it's really just for show, and that ultimately we are the baddest mofos around.

like the united nations.. that's literally just role playing a bunch of dumbshit no one cares about. We dont need the u.n.s permission for anything.
 
wow the high honor of being chief dumbass over all you stupid motherfuckers. I am so honored.

Do you guys have such little life you think being a mod of a political forum with like 40 active members as some pinacle of human achievement? I'm a glorified janitor that tells boomers not to talk about molesting children. That's pretty much all I do here. I do maybe 5 mod actions a week at most.

One of the funniest things I have read on here in a while
 
Grind is wrong. The Iran nuclear agreement kept Iran quiet and they were not building nukes. Trump rashly and stupidly withdrew. The treaty was so respected all the other signees that is stood for more than a year. So trump sanctioned the shit out of them. The ME was far better off with it. Trump.like Bush said. is the chaos president. He makes a mess wherever he goes. This whole conflict falls on Trump's shoulders.
Now the idiot wants NATO to help make a new treaty. Who does he think did it last time?. You can be sure Trump would include Russia this time.
Who would agree to a treaty with Trump? Who could trust him to not just walk away again? The real problem is , has Trump destroyed the entire concept of international pacts and treaties? What do they mean if you could just walk away if you felt like it ?
I will respect a treaty until I shoot a bad score at Mira Lago and then I may be pissed and change my mind.
 
You didn't blame iran for escalating when they attacked our oil tankers, or shot down our drones, or attacked our embassy. You werne't clutching your pearls then.

Why is it you are always siding against america?

That's an easy one; because they are dumber than a box of rocks and think that Trump is a greater threat than terrorist, despots and dictators. Yes, they really are THAT fucking dumb.

Trump declares that he likes air and that air is good!
Leftist response:

tenor.gif
 
well now that we are putting on our serious hats, I would say it depends. I don't mind working with other nations so long as they know it's really just for show, and that ultimately we are the baddest mofos around.

like the united nations.. that's literally just role playing a bunch of dumbshit no one cares about. We dont need the u.n.s permission for anything.

Sure, but we don't really gain anything from having the rest of the world hating us. And if the Overton Window shifts in a way that we're all ok with our president committing foreign war crimes, it won't take long for the government to start committing domestic war crimes.
 
Grind is wrong. The Iran nuclear agreement kept Iran quiet and they were not building nukes. Trump rashly and stupidly withdrew. The treaty was so respected all the other signees that is stood for more than a year. So trump sanctioned the shit out of them. The ME was far better off with it. Trump.like Bush said. is the chaos president. He makes a mess wherever he goes. This whole conflict falls on Trump's shoulders.
Now the idiot wants NATO to help make a new treaty. Who does he think did it last time?. You can be sure Trump would include Russia this time.
Who would agree to a treaty with Trump? Who could trust him to not just walk away again? The real problem is , has Trump destroyed the entire concept of international pacts and treaties? What do they mean if you could just walk away if you felt like it ?
I will respect a treaty until I shoot a bad score at Mira Lago and then I may be pissed and change my mind.

Grind is never wrong.
 
Line dancer wrote: "well now that we are putting on our serious hats, I would say it depends. I don't mind working with other nations so long as they know it's really just for show, and that ultimately we are the baddest mofos around.

like the united nations.. that's literally just role playing a bunch of dumbshit no one cares about. We dont need the u.n.s permission for anything
."

If the UN is not needed and not useful, why do we stay in it? Why have a show? How can you be a hyper nationalist and not support a rules based order
of global reach? If you believe in sovereign nation states, that sovereignty, it follows, must be based upon equality, unless you believe in a global law of the jungle
with rules based upon whatever gorilla happens to be the alpha silverback at any given time.

What hiding under your "thinking cap" restrains the top dog from atrocity, global exploitation, genocide, whatever... if not the combined efforts of the other legally equal
sovereigns.

I think you believe it is a convenient time to be an anarchist, and if China were militarily preeminent you would support a strong UN. Is might making right the extent of your reasoning?
If so I dispute that a serious hat fits your pointy head.
 
Sure, but we don't really gain anything from having the rest of the world hating us. And if the Overton Window shifts in a way that we're all ok with our president committing foreign war crimes, it won't take long for the government to start committing domestic war crimes.

He also apparently doesn't recognize that Russia has 1600 operational strategic nuclear weapons... We do not have the largest standing army by a long shot and … and....

Is there really a "baddest mofo" when everyone in the saloon is packing browning 9 millimeters?
 
He also apparently doesn't recognize that Russia has 1600 operational strategic nuclear weapons... We do not have the largest standing army by a long shot and … and....

Is there really a "baddest mofo" when everyone in the saloon is packing browning 9 millimeters?

It's the age-old case of the insecure guy with the small penis having the biggest gun.
 
He also apparently doesn't recognize that Russia has 1600 operational strategic nuclear weapons... We do not have the largest standing army by a long shot and … and....

Is there really a "baddest mofo" when everyone in the saloon is packing browning 9 millimeters?

Yes, there is a "baddest mofo when everyone in the saloon is packing browning 9 millimeters." It's the one who is fastest on the trigger.
 
The Earl of Havana is in fact a typing-shit-machine created by Hitler and currently used by the Russians to write abuse at anyone who can think. It was invented early in the War, so it is about 80 years old.

So, you are a Nazi, America hating pende*o.
 
Back
Top