Why homosexuality should be banned

  • Thread starter Thread starter WinterBorn
  • Start date Start date
PostmodernProphet said:
I see no reason to keep bringing religion into it....I simply choose to say a pound equals 17 ounces....the government is not treating me fairly, since whenever I buy a pound of hamburger I am getting less than I bargain for and everyone else is getting what they bargain for....in truth, if the government uses my standard the rest of society will benefit, since they will all be getting MORE than they bargained for....I have been shown no logical reason why a pound should not equal 17 ounces and I have shown a logical reason why it should.....

what more should be necessary, unless you are a 16 ounce bigot!.......
Click to expand...

Then convince enough people to see it your way and get it changed.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
But it is going to change and you'll have to accept the fact.
Click to expand...

pmp is wrong....the US constitution has not defined marriage, they tried to CHANGE the constitution to define marriage (FMA) and it failed....it is actually pmp that wishes to change the definition of marriage, not the other way around....for example, in cali, they had to CHANGE the constitution to define marriage as between a man and woman....

pmp just doesn't have a clue in this discussion
 
PostmodernProphet said:
leaningright spelled it out a couple pages ago.....raising a whole new generation thinking that gay marriage is normal......just like we've done since '72 when we began raising kids to think it's normal to kill your children.....
Click to expand...

Or like what happened, when we raised a whole new generation thinking that it's OK to marry outside of their own race. :good4u:
 
Yurt said:
pmp is wrong....the US constitution has not defined marriage, they tried to CHANGE the constitution to define marriage (FMA) and it failed....it is actually pmp that wishes to change the definition of marriage, not the other way around....for example, in cali, they had to CHANGE the constitution to define marriage as between a man and woman....

pmp just doesn't have a clue in this discussion
Click to expand...

He's just scared that two married guys might move next to him and he won't be able to stop peeking over the fence, during the night.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
permitting women to vote was a positive change, permitting blacks to vote was a positive change.....killing unborn children was a negative change.....gay marriage is a negative change......why do you promote negative change?......simply because it's change?.......
Click to expand...
Why is gay marriage a negative change?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
what's wrong with it is forcing government involvement to bring it about.....liberal manipulation of society.....promoting the liberal agenda through mind control.....if you want to surrender to an abnormal lifestyle so be it....don't drag the rest of society down with you......
Click to expand...

I am not surrendering to anything. My lifestyle will not change in the least. And neither will yours, unless you decide to "bat for the other team".
 
Yurt said:
you want to permit britney type marriages, marriage by elvis, 50% divorce rate....but oh no, watch out because the homos are going to ruin our marriages....lol
Click to expand...

can you explain to me why you have concluded I want society's marriages to be Brittany Spears type marriages?.....or did you just decide to make that up so you had something to argue about......

I'm sorry you have completely missed the point I have been trying to raise.....somehow it seems you think this is about damage to "marriage".....you've missed the part it being damage to the whole of society.....

do you think children should be raised thinking either Brittany marriages or gay marriages are good things?....that killing your children before they are born if you don't want them are good things?.....
 
DonQuixote said:
yes, we believe in equal rights under the law

also, my adoptive father molested my brother an me and it took years to get over it

what put the finishing touch on it was when i worked in sf for and with homosexuals and discovered that they were not really different as a group - just decent people trying to get on with their lives

ps, there is not enough love in the world as you demonstrate
Click to expand...

That bears repeating. Although I hate to hear about the molestation. Glad that you seem to have come to terms with it.
 
Yurt said:
pmp is wrong....the US constitution has not defined marriage, they tried to CHANGE the constitution to define marriage (FMA) and it failed....it is actually pmp that wishes to change the definition of marriage, not the other way around....for example, in cali, they had to CHANGE the constitution to define marriage as between a man and woman....

pmp just doesn't have a clue in this discussion
Click to expand...

come on Yurt.....it's obviously you that hasn't a clue.....the Constitution isn't the only place where things are defined.....everyone knows the basic issue is that marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman and gays want to change that to mean a relationship between people of the same sex.....

to try to pretend that isn't the issue is merely a deflection and you know it....if you can't win an argument on its merits don't pretend you can win it with semantics.....
 
Southern Man said:
The marriages that you described, like queer marriage, degrade traditional marriage and are far from normal.
Click to expand...

You have said this before, but you have never actually explained how gay marriages degrade traditional marriages.

Your marriage is between you and your wife. The only people who can degrade your marriage are you or your wife.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top