Why homosexuality should be banned

  • Thread starter Thread starter WinterBorn
  • Start date Start date
We should have a poll. Or you could just admit that you are a flaming homo right now. In fact, with DADT roughly 30 days from expiring, you will soon be in the good graces of the DoD. Ever consider military service, son?
 
WinterBorn said:
And that might be a legitimate reason for excluding them from the church, but not the military. And when you use the word "abomination" you show that you are quoting Leviticus, which is not a book of the bible you want to start following.
Click to expand...

I didn't quote Leviticus, I'm quoting the Word in general and what God says has precedent over anything that man says. The only reason DADT was lifted is because homosexuality, like all kinds of other sinful behavior, has become vogue and accepted by the more liberal people of society, not because its "natural", right, and or proven to be just as "normal" as heterosexuality, so see you get approval for your sexually immoral lifestyle from man, not from God.
 
Charlie Bass said:
I didn't quote Leviticus, I'm quoting the Word in general and what God says has precedent over anything that man says. The only reason DADT was lifted is because homosexuality, like all kinds of other sinful behavior, has become vogue and accepted by the more liberal people of society, not because its "natural", right, and or proven to be just as "normal" as heterosexuality, so see you get approval for your sexually immoral lifestyle from man, not from God.
Click to expand...

Again, it is a legitimate reason to ban homosexuality from the church, but not a legitimate reason for banning homosexuals from military service.
 
Charlie Bass said:
I didn't quote Leviticus, I'm quoting the Word in general and what God says has precedent over anything that man says. The only reason DADT was lifted is because homosexuality, like all kinds of other sinful behavior, has become vogue and accepted by the more liberal people of society, not because its "natural", right, and or proven to be just as "normal" as heterosexuality, so see you get approval for your sexually immoral lifestyle from man, not from God.
Click to expand...

Homophobes are the pussies who use to fear getting beat up in highschool, the ones who didn't get many dates etc. I've never run into a tough guy that was afraid of gay's or even spent much time thinking about them.

Your either a closet homo or your a pussy.
 
Topspin said:
Homophobes are the pussies who use to fear getting beat up in highschool, the ones who didn't get many dates etc. I've never run into a tough guy that was afraid of gay's or even spent much time thinking about them.

Your either a closet homo or your a pussy.
Click to expand...
Can't he be both?
 
Seriously to the non douches (Dixie, asshat, southernGaylord don't answer), we any of the 3 toughest guy's you even knew even the slightest bit concerned with gay's?
 
WinterBorn said:
Again, it is a legitimate reason to ban homosexuality from the church, but not a legitimate reason for banning homosexuals from military service.
Click to expand...

I stated my reasons why they shouldn't be allowed in the military, troops are not going to give effeminate leaders the same respect as one who isn't and at my rank and time in service I'd mostly be in the position of having to defend the leadership of such people. They're using their homosexuality for political gain.
 
Topspin said:
Homophobes are the pussies who use to fear getting beat up in highschool, the ones who didn't get many dates etc. I've never run into a tough guy that was afraid of gay's or even spent much time thinking about them.

Your either a closet homo or your a pussy.
Click to expand...

Nobody is afraid of you gays, I haven't met one "homophobe," you facking gays think too highly of yourselves. I don't care much about gays outside the military, but for those that are in I have no choice, at least for the next 5 years until I retire.
 
Impartial Observer said:
I stated my reasons why they shouldn't be allowed in the military, troops are not going to give effeminate leaders the same respect as one who isn't and at my rank and time in service I'd mostly be in the position of having to defend the leadership of such people. They're using their homosexuality for political gain.
Click to expand...

Effeminate? Are you under the impression that all gay men are effeminate?

Are you also saying that troops do not give female officers the same respect?

These are not reasons for barring gays from the military. The troops will follow orders or face the consequences.
 
WinterBorn said:
Effeminate? Are you under the impression that all gay men are effeminate?

Are you also saying that troops do not give female officers the same respect?

These are not reasons for barring gays from the military. The troops will follow orders or face the consequences.
Click to expand...


I said facking effeminate male soldiers will not get the same respect as non-effeminate male soldiers and effeminate behavior is unprofessional anyways. I don't want to be in the position of having to defend such people that my soldiers are not going to respect.
 
Impartial Observer said:
I said facking effeminate male soldiers will not get the same respect as non-effeminate male soldiers and effeminate behavior is unprofessional anyways. I don't want to be in the position of having to defend such people that my soldiers are not going to respect.
Click to expand...

I doubt the gay military officers who have achieved rank will be swishing around. They will have done the same things to gain rank that other officers have done.

If they have acted in an unprofessional manner they will not have gotten a command.

The soldiers should respect the rank and the uniform, whether they respect the man or not. I had officers I disliked. But they were still in my chain-of-command.


You swore an oath. Serve that oath and don't worry about who sleeps with who.
 
this new asshole needs to be added to the list of homophobe pussies.
That's what happens when you go to long womanless, you start blaming gay's.

Impartial tool. LOFL
 
WinterBorn said:
Effeminate? Are you under the impression that all gay men are effeminate?

Are you also saying that troops do not give female officers the same respect?

These are not reasons for barring gays from the military. The troops will follow orders or face the consequences.
Click to expand...


What do you mean by "face the consequences?" You know nothing about how the military functions, leaders are supposed to get the best out of their troops in order for the military to operate flawlessly, if a leader can't do that he is of no use, so yeah, troops can follow orders but that doesn't mean you're getting best out of them, it could be half-assed performance and effort. The military isn't about "just following orders," without the trust and respect of your subordinates you as a leader will fail.
 
WinterBorn said:
I doubt the gay military officers who have achieved rank will be swishing around. They will have done the same things to gain rank that other officers have done.

If they have acted in an unprofessional manner they will not have gotten a command.

The soldiers should respect the rank and the uniform, whether they respect the man or not. I had officers I disliked. But they were still in my chain-of-command.


You swore an oath. Serve that oath and don't worry about who sleeps with who.
Click to expand...

Respecting rank is as simple as saying Yes sir/ma'am, no sir/ma'am, yes sergeant/no sergeant, its as simple as that. If you as an officer cannot motivate your troops to excel for what ever reason you have failed as a leader.

Officers and NCOs who previously didn't act effeminate might start acting effeminate and it doesn't matter so much about what the rules say its about what you as a leader can accomplish and whether you can et best out of your troops, that part cannot be forced on troops and if these troops are not going to work as hard with a lot of dedication because they have a openly gay commander or NCO and or just feel morally it isn't right the military will not be as efficient.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top