Publius
Well-known member
People with more money give more than people with less, or no, money ... and that's for everything, not just political contributions.
Some other words for you: "Diplomacy" and "Politics."
Yep.
Of course it is. They purchased product is the company. Did you miss that part.
Undefined buzzword. Dismissed.
Everything you mentioned is illegal. Money is not to blame for crime. Criminals are to blame for the crimes they commit. Leave it to a Marxist to excuse criminals and blame inanimate objects.
You are clearly one of those who thinks that your posture in a debate is somehow elevated by regurgitating the stupid things your slave-masters have instructed you to believe.
You haven't responded intelligently to any of my points. I'm going to just continue breathing as opposed to holding my breath.
Nope.
Nope.
Nope. Hint: Labor is just a commodity like any other. Money has nothing to do with that.
Money has everything to do with it.
You see, you didn't grasp my point, labor is the ULTIMATE source of the value of money. You're just looking way past it, on the surface, where in modernity that fact got buried.
Money is power. You can buy people with it to do your bidding. Trump does it, lots of rich people do it.Money doesn't wield anything. Your thought-masters' comments are stupid.
Fuck you. If you can't accept my statement at face value, that makes you a smug prick fuckwit.I am under the correct notion that you are completely opposed to free markets, and that you would do whatever you could to "fix" the non-problems that you listed above, and a whole lot more.
Nope. I simply profiled you to be the Marxist that you are. I haven't seen enough from you to know whether you are a communist or a socialist. Would you care to divulge?
So, you're a communist? Would you prefer "Marxist Anarchist"?
I don't answer loaded questions.So I'll ask ... what is so bad about making America great again?
You're deluded.You haven't convinced me. I'm presuming that you are a Marxist, and now I'm presuming that you are gun-shy about admitting such.
... not if you refer to them as "rigged markets." You give yourself away when you write "—it’s a rigged system where a handful of powerful corporations and wealthy individuals pull the strings." That's your standard incoherent Marxist raving right there. Save it for your prayers to Karl.
Full stop. You're a Marxist. You're not going to convince me that you are somehow not a Marxist by using Marxist phraseology like the purity of capitalism. Like any Marxist, you don't even know what capitalism is beyond the generic slur it is intended to be.
"Capitalism" doesn't have a "purity".
I figured out the problem. You need to be engaged in a discussion with Blackwater Lunchbreak. I'm really not the right guy. You and he will hit it off big time.
They are absolutely necessary for a free society, which is not a priority in your agenda.
Fortunately, economics works the same for everyone just as it does for those at the top.
Oh, the smugness of certainty—nothing says 'I'm terrified of being wrong' quite like pretending there's no other side to the story. It's almost adorable, really, how you think shutting down debate makes you look strong when all it does is highlight your fear of actual discourse. Keep clinging to that one-track mind; it’s the surest way to prove you’ve got nothing else to offer.
See, you don't really debate. A serious debater will consider another's argument, what you do is cram your viewpoint down other's throats, as if you are God and you are right no matter what.
There's a simple term for people like you, the term is 'fuckwit'.
Now fuck off. I'll find someone who is serious, if not, I won't bother.